After watching last nights game Denver was by far the right choice and I'm certain anyone who took Denver last night would take that same game 10 out of 10 times. I thought Oak would come out with some fire and take opportunities they normally wouldn't considering their current situation. I was wrong and they looked like the same garbage team we have seen all year. Broncos should have put up a lot more points than they did and I think the Raiders were fortunate to keep this one as close as they did. I don't see how anyone can argue with trends, especially after watching the game, and still wanting Oak same game same spread. Glad I stayed away...butt screwed myself anyway by making a small play on the over. Ohh well
After watching last nights game Denver was by far the right choice and I'm certain anyone who took Denver last night would take that same game 10 out of 10 times. I thought Oak would come out with some fire and take opportunities they normally wouldn't considering their current situation. I was wrong and they looked like the same garbage team we have seen all year. Broncos should have put up a lot more points than they did and I think the Raiders were fortunate to keep this one as close as they did. I don't see how anyone can argue with trends, especially after watching the game, and still wanting Oak same game same spread. Glad I stayed away...butt screwed myself anyway by making a small play on the over. Ohh well
Pretty stupid thread.....
Denver had 6 scoring drives, Oakland had 2....
Denver also turned it over on the 25 yd line....
Denver kicked 3 fgs from inside the 20
This game was 2 plays away from being a 24+ game......
Provide whatever stats you want, they dont apply to this game....
Pretty stupid thread.....
Denver had 6 scoring drives, Oakland had 2....
Denver also turned it over on the 25 yd line....
Denver kicked 3 fgs from inside the 20
This game was 2 plays away from being a 24+ game......
Provide whatever stats you want, they dont apply to this game....
I thought we covered this last thursday on the ATL NLO game.... In BOTH games the unpopular favs won. People used whatever trend numbers they wanted to make thair cases..... THEY BOTH LOST.... The losers even after game is over and they lost their wagers claim: I WAS ON THE RIGHT SIDE....
CMON MAN
I thought we covered this last thursday on the ATL NLO game.... In BOTH games the unpopular favs won. People used whatever trend numbers they wanted to make thair cases..... THEY BOTH LOST.... The losers even after game is over and they lost their wagers claim: I WAS ON THE RIGHT SIDE....
CMON MAN
This happens EVERY WEEK with Oakland
They lead the league in flags
They are one of the worst turnover teams in the league
That is nothing new to this team....
But, the Broncos with 4 fg inside the 20 and an int on 1st down from the 25 That does not happen often with team....
What Oakland did last night is normal, Denver left atleast 14 points off the board they usually get on a conistant basis
Pretty sure Oakland has like the 30th ranked redzone d....and they held Denver to 1-6 TDS inside the 20
Im going out on a limb and saying that wouldnt happen again
This happens EVERY WEEK with Oakland
They lead the league in flags
They are one of the worst turnover teams in the league
That is nothing new to this team....
But, the Broncos with 4 fg inside the 20 and an int on 1st down from the 25 That does not happen often with team....
What Oakland did last night is normal, Denver left atleast 14 points off the board they usually get on a conistant basis
Pretty sure Oakland has like the 30th ranked redzone d....and they held Denver to 1-6 TDS inside the 20
Im going out on a limb and saying that wouldnt happen again
Well said
Well said
Um thats called defense and a bad oakland offense that some of us knew of before the game. Wow and this guy topshow agrees with you and is bashing others who have sense. Only on covers....
Um thats called defense and a bad oakland offense that some of us knew of before the game. Wow and this guy topshow agrees with you and is bashing others who have sense. Only on covers....
Tragic watching those field goals last night when u have a play on the over. This is a stupid thread. Unless something major was to happen to this Denver team, this end result will remain the same. More times than not, Denver would end the game with more points than they did last night.
Oak + McFadds Denver (-) McGahee and still same result
Tragic watching those field goals last night when u have a play on the over. This is a stupid thread. Unless something major was to happen to this Denver team, this end result will remain the same. More times than not, Denver would end the game with more points than they did last night.
Oak + McFadds Denver (-) McGahee and still same result
Palmer actually had a higher QB Passer rating than Manning, 101 - 98.
And QB Passer rating has the highest correlation to winning the game then any stat, about 80%.
Palmer also passed for a higher ave per play then Manning, by about 1 yd per pass att. About 75% correlation to winning the game, I'm very surprised Raiders could not cover a big number when out-playing Broncos in these areas.
Palmer actually had a higher QB Passer rating than Manning, 101 - 98.
And QB Passer rating has the highest correlation to winning the game then any stat, about 80%.
Palmer also passed for a higher ave per play then Manning, by about 1 yd per pass att. About 75% correlation to winning the game, I'm very surprised Raiders could not cover a big number when out-playing Broncos in these areas.
Ticket #: | 65721379 |
Accepted: | 12/04/12 6:33 PM (EST) |
Risk: | $350.00 |
Win: | $7,350.00 |
Outcome: | Win |
Header: | Minnesota (7-8) @ Philadelphia (10-7) |
Sport: | NBA |
Scheduled : | 12/04/12 7:05 PM (EST) |
Outcome: | Win |
Final Score: | Minnesota Timberwolves 105-88 over Philadelphia 76ers |
Header: | Indiana (8-9) @ Chicago (8-7) (WGN) |
Sport: | NBA |
Scheduled : | 12/04/12 8:05 PM (EST) |
Outcome: | Win |
Final Score: | Indiana Pacers 80-76 over Chicago Bulls |
Header: | Oklahoma (6-1) @ Arkansas (3-3) (ESPN2) |
Sport: | NCAA Basketball |
Scheduled : | 12/04/12 7:00 PM (EST) |
Outcome: | Win |
Final Score: | .Arkansas 81-78 over .Oklahoma U |
Header: | George Washington (4-3) @ Bradley (5-2) |
Sport: | NCAA Basketball |
Scheduled : | 12/04/12 8:00 PM (EST) |
Outcome: | Win |
Final Score: | .Bradley 72-68 over .George Washington |
Header: | Samford (2-7) @ Kentucky (4-3) |
Sport: | NCAA Basketball |
Scheduled : | 12/04/12 7:05 PM (EST) |
Outcome: | Win |
Final Score: | .Kentucky 88-56 over .Samford |
Ticket #: | 65721379 |
Accepted: | 12/04/12 6:33 PM (EST) |
Risk: | $350.00 |
Win: | $7,350.00 |
Outcome: | Win |
Header: | Minnesota (7-8) @ Philadelphia (10-7) |
Sport: | NBA |
Scheduled : | 12/04/12 7:05 PM (EST) |
Outcome: | Win |
Final Score: | Minnesota Timberwolves 105-88 over Philadelphia 76ers |
Header: | Indiana (8-9) @ Chicago (8-7) (WGN) |
Sport: | NBA |
Scheduled : | 12/04/12 8:05 PM (EST) |
Outcome: | Win |
Final Score: | Indiana Pacers 80-76 over Chicago Bulls |
Header: | Oklahoma (6-1) @ Arkansas (3-3) (ESPN2) |
Sport: | NCAA Basketball |
Scheduled : | 12/04/12 7:00 PM (EST) |
Outcome: | Win |
Final Score: | .Arkansas 81-78 over .Oklahoma U |
Header: | George Washington (4-3) @ Bradley (5-2) |
Sport: | NCAA Basketball |
Scheduled : | 12/04/12 8:00 PM (EST) |
Outcome: | Win |
Final Score: | .Bradley 72-68 over .George Washington |
Header: | Samford (2-7) @ Kentucky (4-3) |
Sport: | NCAA Basketball |
Scheduled : | 12/04/12 7:05 PM (EST) |
Outcome: | Win |
Final Score: | .Kentucky 88-56 over .Samford |
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.