Were you watching the game?? If they leave LeBron wide open like that again, of course he's going to make all of his shots. This was no accident that they decided not to defend LeBron at all tonight. They purposely gave him wide open looks, how in the heck did you not see this?
Were you watching the game?? If they leave LeBron wide open like that again, of course he's going to make all of his shots. This was no accident that they decided not to defend LeBron at all tonight. They purposely gave him wide open looks, how in the heck did you not see this?
Were you watching the game?? If they leave LeBron wide open like that again, of course he's going to make all of his shots. This was no accident that they decided not to defend LeBron at all tonight. They purposely gave him wide open looks, how in the heck did you not see this?
Were you watching the game?? If they leave LeBron wide open like that again, of course he's going to make all of his shots. This was no accident that they decided not to defend LeBron at all tonight. They purposely gave him wide open looks, how in the heck did you not see this?
I hate to always sound right here....but damn you guys are blind! They were not leaving James wide open like that all series, and it definitely wasn't their "plan" for the reasons you mentioned.
it's all part of the script man. Just look at the game again last night. Yes the difference is subtle so you have to open your eyes. But you should see it. They had a man on James, but instead of putting a hand in his face like they SHOULD have, they simply let him jump up and take the shot uncontested.
There was zero reason to not defend the shot unless the warriors were trying to give LeBron a big game...which they WERE. Go look at the difference in defense between game 5 and the other games.
Lebron absolutely will make almost all of his shots if you leave him wide open. Lebron is a good shooter when uncontested. But when defended he is terrible. SO to make him look good again last night they obviously told the warriors not to defend. But they certainly were trying to ACT as if they were but they did a horrible job. They'd jump a little bit too late after LeBron already got his wide open look
So just watch closely and you wouldn't be arguing with me about this
I hate to always sound right here....but damn you guys are blind! They were not leaving James wide open like that all series, and it definitely wasn't their "plan" for the reasons you mentioned.
it's all part of the script man. Just look at the game again last night. Yes the difference is subtle so you have to open your eyes. But you should see it. They had a man on James, but instead of putting a hand in his face like they SHOULD have, they simply let him jump up and take the shot uncontested.
There was zero reason to not defend the shot unless the warriors were trying to give LeBron a big game...which they WERE. Go look at the difference in defense between game 5 and the other games.
Lebron absolutely will make almost all of his shots if you leave him wide open. Lebron is a good shooter when uncontested. But when defended he is terrible. SO to make him look good again last night they obviously told the warriors not to defend. But they certainly were trying to ACT as if they were but they did a horrible job. They'd jump a little bit too late after LeBron already got his wide open look
So just watch closely and you wouldn't be arguing with me about this
Just debunked this. Lebron only misses his shots when he is defended. Last night's game was rigged for Lebron to have a monster game, so GS only "Acted" as if they were playing defense, but made it obvious they were not. Go back and watch. Then watch the other games Notice how GS is allowing Lebron to shoot before the put the hand up in his face? No way you can be that blind, go back and look and compare. You'll see.
Just debunked this. Lebron only misses his shots when he is defended. Last night's game was rigged for Lebron to have a monster game, so GS only "Acted" as if they were playing defense, but made it obvious they were not. Go back and watch. Then watch the other games Notice how GS is allowing Lebron to shoot before the put the hand up in his face? No way you can be that blind, go back and look and compare. You'll see.
How come you like GS to close it out on the road bro?
Does it have to do with the green situation? Because all the greens in the world aren't going to help GS on the road in game 6.
How come you like GS to close it out on the road bro?
Does it have to do with the green situation? Because all the greens in the world aren't going to help GS on the road in game 6.
Just debunked this. Lebron only misses his shots when he is defended. Last night's game was rigged for Lebron to have a monster game, so GS only "Acted" as if they were playing defense, but made it obvious they were not. Go back and watch. Then watch the other games Notice how GS is allowing Lebron to shoot before the put the hand up in his face? No way you can be that blind, go back and look and compare. You'll see.
Just debunked this. Lebron only misses his shots when he is defended. Last night's game was rigged for Lebron to have a monster game, so GS only "Acted" as if they were playing defense, but made it obvious they were not. Go back and watch. Then watch the other games Notice how GS is allowing Lebron to shoot before the put the hand up in his face? No way you can be that blind, go back and look and compare. You'll see.
I'm not saying he is a good shooter. I am saying he is a decent shooter and when left wide open, he can and WILL put up 50 every single game. Last night wasn't a fluke, GS allowed him to shoot because of the script. If you want to be blind to this, well that's your choice. But I offered for you to go back and watch the tapes for proof.
I'm not saying he is a good shooter. I am saying he is a decent shooter and when left wide open, he can and WILL put up 50 every single game. Last night wasn't a fluke, GS allowed him to shoot because of the script. If you want to be blind to this, well that's your choice. But I offered for you to go back and watch the tapes for proof.
Yeah and the script was to take out Green just as I said before he even got suspended. NBA is so predictable
Next it will be curry, if not then Bogut and whoever else will be enough for cavs. Whatever they have to do to ensure a cavs win in this series, I think they will do it
Yeah and the script was to take out Green just as I said before he even got suspended. NBA is so predictable
Next it will be curry, if not then Bogut and whoever else will be enough for cavs. Whatever they have to do to ensure a cavs win in this series, I think they will do it
I'm not saying he is a good shooter. I am saying he is a decent shooter and when left wide open, he can and WILL put up 50 every single game. Last night wasn't a fluke, GS allowed him to shoot because of the script. If you want to be blind to this, well that's your choice. But I offered for you to go back and watch the tapes for proof.
I'm not saying he is a good shooter. I am saying he is a decent shooter and when left wide open, he can and WILL put up 50 every single game. Last night wasn't a fluke, GS allowed him to shoot because of the script. If you want to be blind to this, well that's your choice. But I offered for you to go back and watch the tapes for proof.
I'm a fan of profits as well...but that's why you should always have a reason for your play...
Are you blindly betting this? Or do you just not want to state your reasons publicly?
If you're blindly betting be careful....GS is in a bad spot here. I know they are the far better team, but just because Green is back does not mean GS is winning game 6.
GS had green game 3 and they lost by 30 in the same building. Must win for the cavs, no way I am backing out of my bet just because someone online tells me that Cavs will lose.
The only way I'd back out of my bet is if I saw some good reasoning as to why cavs should lose the game. All I see is good reasons for GS to lose. I see no good reason for cavs to lose, and usuaully when I see no good reason for a team to lose I am right, and that team ends up winning
I'm a fan of profits as well...but that's why you should always have a reason for your play...
Are you blindly betting this? Or do you just not want to state your reasons publicly?
If you're blindly betting be careful....GS is in a bad spot here. I know they are the far better team, but just because Green is back does not mean GS is winning game 6.
GS had green game 3 and they lost by 30 in the same building. Must win for the cavs, no way I am backing out of my bet just because someone online tells me that Cavs will lose.
The only way I'd back out of my bet is if I saw some good reasoning as to why cavs should lose the game. All I see is good reasons for GS to lose. I see no good reason for cavs to lose, and usuaully when I see no good reason for a team to lose I am right, and that team ends up winning
Why would they even ACT as if they were trying to defend then, if they were not planning on it? Can you not see how fake this sport is?
Why would they even ACT as if they were trying to defend then, if they were not planning on it? Can you not see how fake this sport is?
I'm a fan of profits as well...but that's why you should always have a reason for your play...
Are you blindly betting this? Or do you just not want to state your reasons publicly?
If you're blindly betting be careful....GS is in a bad spot here. I know they are the far better team, but just because Green is back does not mean GS is winning game 6.
GS had green game 3 and they lost by 30 in the same building. Must win for the cavs, no way I am backing out of my bet just because someone online tells me that Cavs will lose.
The only way I'd back out of my bet is if I saw some good reasoning as to why cavs should lose the game. All I see is good reasons for GS to lose. I see no good reason for cavs to lose, and usuaully when I see no good reason for a team to lose I am right, and that team ends up winning
I'm a fan of profits as well...but that's why you should always have a reason for your play...
Are you blindly betting this? Or do you just not want to state your reasons publicly?
If you're blindly betting be careful....GS is in a bad spot here. I know they are the far better team, but just because Green is back does not mean GS is winning game 6.
GS had green game 3 and they lost by 30 in the same building. Must win for the cavs, no way I am backing out of my bet just because someone online tells me that Cavs will lose.
The only way I'd back out of my bet is if I saw some good reasoning as to why cavs should lose the game. All I see is good reasons for GS to lose. I see no good reason for cavs to lose, and usuaully when I see no good reason for a team to lose I am right, and that team ends up winning
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.