LOL without a doubt one of the most articulate posters on covers, Scal, Whether you win or lose these write ups you are one of my favorite Characters, The only thing that would make me laugh harder is if you came in here and said, You posted that play on purpose to get back at the white man.
LOL without a doubt one of the most articulate posters on covers, Scal, Whether you win or lose these write ups you are one of my favorite Characters, The only thing that would make me laugh harder is if you came in here and said, You posted that play on purpose to get back at the white man.
I haven't posted a thread with a pick in the CFB forum in my entire life and since when is waiting till next week's games 'chasing'??
Yes you do. 1/2 your bankroll on Portland 1st game of the year, then after that lost you chased with the other half on Portland's next game. Then you wrote up how desperate the Knicks were for a win and they lost, so you chased the Knicks again the next game because then they really, super needed a win.
So next week you will chase this Rutgers loss by taking them again, this time against USF. You'll have a write up saying you're taking them because of "research" but the only research you'll do is on reasons to justify chasing Rutgers.
I haven't posted a thread with a pick in the CFB forum in my entire life and since when is waiting till next week's games 'chasing'??
Yes you do. 1/2 your bankroll on Portland 1st game of the year, then after that lost you chased with the other half on Portland's next game. Then you wrote up how desperate the Knicks were for a win and they lost, so you chased the Knicks again the next game because then they really, super needed a win.
So next week you will chase this Rutgers loss by taking them again, this time against USF. You'll have a write up saying you're taking them because of "research" but the only research you'll do is on reasons to justify chasing Rutgers.
I've had enough talking shitt to you. You made a bet and lost. Whatever. Moving on to the next. Only real beef I have with you is your thread titles enticing people to come in. Then you make a big write-up to entice people to tail you. It's your thread so you can do whatever you want. You can make whatever write-up you please, but telling people to tail you tomorrow for the Dolphins to make up the money you lost whoever tailed you today is just not the right way to go about it. Good luck with the Dolphins. I hate the Jets, so hope you actually win that bet, but it won't be easy in NY tomorrow with that putrid O-Line going up against Jets great D-Line.
I've had enough talking shitt to you. You made a bet and lost. Whatever. Moving on to the next. Only real beef I have with you is your thread titles enticing people to come in. Then you make a big write-up to entice people to tail you. It's your thread so you can do whatever you want. You can make whatever write-up you please, but telling people to tail you tomorrow for the Dolphins to make up the money you lost whoever tailed you today is just not the right way to go about it. Good luck with the Dolphins. I hate the Jets, so hope you actually win that bet, but it won't be easy in NY tomorrow with that putrid O-Line going up against Jets great D-Line.
Yes you do. 1/2 your bankroll on Portland 1st game of the year, then after that lost you chased with the other half on Portland's next game. Then you wrote up how desperate the Knicks were for a win and they lost, so you chased the Knicks again the next game because then they really, super needed a win.
So next week you will chase this Rutgers loss by taking them again, this time against USF. You'll have a write up saying you're taking them because of "research" but the only research you'll do is on reasons to justify chasing Rutgers.
So when the Blazer ML hits, it's a chase. But if it loses you'd say 'another losing post!!' You win both ways! Yeah sure.
The Blazer ML hit and paid 1.65 to 1 so anyone who tailed me on both plays won all their money back and 65% minus juice on the last bet
But it's a chase right? It wasn't researched. I didn't write that Brian Shaw plays a half court game, the opposite of Karl and it would take time to adjust. I didn't say despite the suns loss, the blazers had a ton of talent (the 2nd best in the west right now) at their disposal that would come out.
Nah, it was just a simple chase. Lol!
You're certifiably nuts or stupid. Take your pick.
Yes you do. 1/2 your bankroll on Portland 1st game of the year, then after that lost you chased with the other half on Portland's next game. Then you wrote up how desperate the Knicks were for a win and they lost, so you chased the Knicks again the next game because then they really, super needed a win.
So next week you will chase this Rutgers loss by taking them again, this time against USF. You'll have a write up saying you're taking them because of "research" but the only research you'll do is on reasons to justify chasing Rutgers.
So when the Blazer ML hits, it's a chase. But if it loses you'd say 'another losing post!!' You win both ways! Yeah sure.
The Blazer ML hit and paid 1.65 to 1 so anyone who tailed me on both plays won all their money back and 65% minus juice on the last bet
But it's a chase right? It wasn't researched. I didn't write that Brian Shaw plays a half court game, the opposite of Karl and it would take time to adjust. I didn't say despite the suns loss, the blazers had a ton of talent (the 2nd best in the west right now) at their disposal that would come out.
Nah, it was just a simple chase. Lol!
You're certifiably nuts or stupid. Take your pick.
LOL without a doubt one of the most articulate posters on covers, Scal, Whether you win or lose these write ups you are one of my favorite Characters, The only thing that would make me laugh harder is if you came in here and said, You posted that play on purpose to get back at the white man.
Thanks man.
And don't think similar things haven't been said already!!
LOL without a doubt one of the most articulate posters on covers, Scal, Whether you win or lose these write ups you are one of my favorite Characters, The only thing that would make me laugh harder is if you came in here and said, You posted that play on purpose to get back at the white man.
Thanks man.
And don't think similar things haven't been said already!!
I've had enough talking shitt to you. You made a bet and lost. Whatever. Moving on to the next. Only real beef I have with you is your thread titles enticing people to come in. Then you make a big write-up to entice people to tail you. It's your thread so you can do whatever you want. You can make whatever write-up you please, but telling people to tail you tomorrow for the Dolphins to make up the money you lost whoever tailed you today is just not the right way to go about it. Good luck with the Dolphins. I hate the Jets, so hope you actually win that bet, but it won't be easy in NY tomorrow with that putrid O-Line going up against Jets great D-Line.
I am not a CFB expert. I know Rutgers and they bottomed out here. I unfortunately was the one who followed them into the abyss.
But when it comes to the Jets, I know my team.
And that is why I posted. You want to make money? Tail.
This thread was a payback of sorts that didn't pay anything back.
The Jets post is the main course. This was the breadstick that fell in the floor.
But when dinner is served, everyone can partake in the meal I serve tomorrow.
We won't be having Dolphin, I can promise you that.
I've had enough talking shitt to you. You made a bet and lost. Whatever. Moving on to the next. Only real beef I have with you is your thread titles enticing people to come in. Then you make a big write-up to entice people to tail you. It's your thread so you can do whatever you want. You can make whatever write-up you please, but telling people to tail you tomorrow for the Dolphins to make up the money you lost whoever tailed you today is just not the right way to go about it. Good luck with the Dolphins. I hate the Jets, so hope you actually win that bet, but it won't be easy in NY tomorrow with that putrid O-Line going up against Jets great D-Line.
I am not a CFB expert. I know Rutgers and they bottomed out here. I unfortunately was the one who followed them into the abyss.
But when it comes to the Jets, I know my team.
And that is why I posted. You want to make money? Tail.
This thread was a payback of sorts that didn't pay anything back.
The Jets post is the main course. This was the breadstick that fell in the floor.
But when dinner is served, everyone can partake in the meal I serve tomorrow.
We won't be having Dolphin, I can promise you that.
So when the Blazer ML hits, it's a chase. But if it loses you'd say 'another losing post!!' You win both ways! Yeah sure.
The Blazer ML hit and paid 1.65 to 1 so anyone who tailed me on both plays won all their money back and 65% minus juice on the last bet
But it's a chase right? It wasn't researched. I didn't write that Brian Shaw plays a half court game, the opposite of Karl and it would take time to adjust. I didn't say despite the suns loss, the blazers had a ton of talent (the 2nd best in the west right now) at their disposal that would come out.
Nah, it was just a simple chase. Lol!
You're certifiably nuts or stupid. Take your pick.
That's the definition of a chase! If the 1st one loses, bet more on the second. But since you bet half your bankroll on the 1st, the only way you could chase the losses and turn a profit was by taking the money line, so that's what you did.
And then you did it again with the Knicks... And next week you'll do it with Rutgers.
So when the Blazer ML hits, it's a chase. But if it loses you'd say 'another losing post!!' You win both ways! Yeah sure.
The Blazer ML hit and paid 1.65 to 1 so anyone who tailed me on both plays won all their money back and 65% minus juice on the last bet
But it's a chase right? It wasn't researched. I didn't write that Brian Shaw plays a half court game, the opposite of Karl and it would take time to adjust. I didn't say despite the suns loss, the blazers had a ton of talent (the 2nd best in the west right now) at their disposal that would come out.
Nah, it was just a simple chase. Lol!
You're certifiably nuts or stupid. Take your pick.
That's the definition of a chase! If the 1st one loses, bet more on the second. But since you bet half your bankroll on the 1st, the only way you could chase the losses and turn a profit was by taking the money line, so that's what you did.
And then you did it again with the Knicks... And next week you'll do it with Rutgers.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.