Week 2: Pitt -3 +100 vs Chi +3 -125 final score:17-14 chi
Week 4: Dallas -3 +100 vs Den +3 -125 final score 17-10 den
Week 6: Baltimore +2.5 vs Minnesota -2.5 final score 33-31 Min
Week 8: New York Giants -1 vs Phi +1 final score 40-17 Phi
Week 9: Baltimore -3 +100 vs Cin +3 -125 final score 17-7 cin
Week 10: Atlanta -1 vs Carolina +1 final score 28-19 Car
" Dallas -3 +100 vs Gb +3 -120 final score17-7 Gb
I know theres that other guy on here that does his but he does it for totals aswell, and there is no such thing as a trap line for totals. In my book a trap line is where a favourite with 65% or more action is either laying less than a field goal or is laying 3 with no juice.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
For 2009, how trap lines have fared ats
Week 2: Pitt -3 +100 vs Chi +3 -125 final score:17-14 chi
Week 4: Dallas -3 +100 vs Den +3 -125 final score 17-10 den
Week 6: Baltimore +2.5 vs Minnesota -2.5 final score 33-31 Min
Week 8: New York Giants -1 vs Phi +1 final score 40-17 Phi
Week 9: Baltimore -3 +100 vs Cin +3 -125 final score 17-7 cin
Week 10: Atlanta -1 vs Carolina +1 final score 28-19 Car
" Dallas -3 +100 vs Gb +3 -120 final score17-7 Gb
I know theres that other guy on here that does his but he does it for totals aswell, and there is no such thing as a trap line for totals. In my book a trap line is where a favourite with 65% or more action is either laying less than a field goal or is laying 3 with no juice.
While this is true you are leaving out the numerous occasions the so called trap covered. I don't believe in trap games but I know a lot of people do. The most recent one I can remember is when everyone was taking Denver on MNF because Pitt was a trap.
0
While this is true you are leaving out the numerous occasions the so called trap covered. I don't believe in trap games but I know a lot of people do. The most recent one I can remember is when everyone was taking Denver on MNF because Pitt was a trap.
While this is true you are leaving out the numerous occasions the so called trap covered. I don't believe in trap games but I know a lot of people do. The most recent one I can remember is when everyone was taking Denver on MNF because Pitt was a trap.
Pickinvet is a smart man.
0
Quote Originally Posted by pickinvet:
While this is true you are leaving out the numerous occasions the so called trap covered. I don't believe in trap games but I know a lot of people do. The most recent one I can remember is when everyone was taking Denver on MNF because Pitt was a trap.
I basically see the ones that covered and the ones that don't being unrelated to the so called trap lines. I lose some bets sometimes but never think that it was a trap or that its fixed etc... I think that if one believes in all that too much then it would be silly for that person to wan't to make wagers on this game at all.
Good luck to you, I know we are on different sides on this one but I really feel if Ravens win it won't be because a trap etc... thats all
0
I basically see the ones that covered and the ones that don't being unrelated to the so called trap lines. I lose some bets sometimes but never think that it was a trap or that its fixed etc... I think that if one believes in all that too much then it would be silly for that person to wan't to make wagers on this game at all.
Good luck to you, I know we are on different sides on this one but I really feel if Ravens win it won't be because a trap etc... thats all
how do you define "trap" line? Each week I can pick out at least 1 game where the line does not make sense but I wouldn't considered those as trap game.
0
how do you define "trap" line? Each week I can pick out at least 1 game where the line does not make sense but I wouldn't considered those as trap game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.