Heres how trap lines have done this year ats

For 2009, how trap lines have fared ats

Week 2: Pitt -3 +100 vs Chi +3 -125 final score:17-14 chi

Week 4: Dallas -3 +100 vs Den +3 -125 final score 17-10 den

Week 6: Baltimore +2.5 vs Minnesota -2.5 final score 33-31 Min

Week 8: New York Giants -1 vs Phi +1 final score 40-17 Phi

Week 9: Baltimore -3 +100 vs Cin +3 -125 final score 17-7 cin

Week 10: Atlanta -1 vs Carolina +1 final score 28-19 Car

     "        Dallas -3 +100 vs Gb +3 -120 final score17-7 Gb

I know theres that other guy on here that does his but he does it for totals aswell, and there is no such thing as a trap line for totals. In my book a trap line is where a favourite with 65% or more action is either laying less than a field goal or is laying 3 with no juice.

While this is true you are leaving out the numerous occasions the so called trap covered.  I don't believe in trap games but I know a lot of people do. The most recent one I can remember is when everyone was taking Denver on MNF because Pitt was a trap.

Pickinvet is a smart man.

I basically see the ones that covered and the ones that don't being unrelated to the so called trap lines.  I lose some bets sometimes but never think that it was a trap or that its fixed etc... I think that if one believes in all that too much then it would be silly for that person to wan't to make wagers on this game at all. 

Good luck to you, I know we are on different sides on this one but I really feel if Ravens win it won't be because a trap etc... thats all

how do you define "trap" line?  Each week I can pick out at least 1 game where the line does not make sense but I wouldn't considered those as trap game.