Our new forums will be launched soon. Check it out for yourself.

AHL says officials erred in allowing fluke goal

Forum: NHL Betting
Author: [NHL Betting] Topic: AHL says officials erred in allowing fluke goal
Skubishack PM Skubishack
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14624
Participation Meter
Posted: 6/10/2012 1:40:05 PM

AHL: Goal shouldn't have counted


From ESPN -

TORONTO -- The American Hockey League said its officials made a mistake in allowing a fluke overtime goal to stand in Game 3 of the Calder Cup final.

The goal gave the Norfolk Admirals a 1-0 win Wednesday night and a 3-0 series lead over the Toronto Marlies.

The Admirals got the win after defenseman Mike Kostka's dump-in hit a stanchion deep in the Marlies zone and bounced into an open net.

Toronto goalie Ben Scrivens was behind the goal to play the incoming puck, but could only watch as the puck took a wild bounce.

The officials didn't notice Norfolk had at least one player offside when the puck was shot in. According to AHL rules, the goal should have been disallowed.

AHL president Dave Andrews says in a statement that despite the error, the result will stand.

Norfolk can clinch the Calder Cup by winning Game 4 on Saturday.

"We have spoken with Toronto Marlies management and confirmed that a rules interpretation error by the on-ice officials occurred on the Norfolk Admirals' overtime goal during Game 3 of the Calder Cup finals," Andrews said.

He went on to explain that a correct application of the AHL rulebook would have negated the goal.

"As AHL bylaws do not allow for any change to the final result of a game based on an incorrect rule interpretation, the result of the game stands," he said.


There was one simular in this seasons NHL playoffs... A goal scored but was immediately called OFFSIDES after the puck was fired into an empty net from the neutral zone. I guess since it's Minor Leage Hockey that you get even worse refs.

Shame for the Marlies since the record book will always say they were swept. Had that goal been disallowed the Marlies would have been down 1-2 in the series and might have been able to tie the series in game 4... There is a big difference between going out onto the ice knowing you can tie a series... vs going onto the ice knowing you are down 0-3 in a series. I mean game 3 was scoreless into OT so that could have been the straw that broke the Marlies will.

Forum: NHL Betting
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.
Desktop View: Switch to Mobile View