Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Haws +3 even though dwight howard is questionable?
|
BookieKiller01 | 1391 |
|
|
replied to
ARMY VS. NAVY: Oh look, the books gave us one more game to cap. Ok, we'll burn them on this one too!
in College Football
for those that haven't bet, should we take army live -3.5 now with navy coming back???
|
scalabrine | 175 |
|
|
replied to
ARMY VS. NAVY: Oh look, the books gave us one more game to cap. Ok, we'll burn them on this one too!
in College Football
it's back to +5.5 -110.....is that a good thing??
|
scalabrine | 175 |
|
|
replied to
PENN STATE vs. WISCONSIN @ Lucas Oil Stadium: Momentum - The most powerful force in sports today
in College Football
betting is hilarious. every time you bet more than u normally do, you lose...i would miss his st johns bet and then try to make it up on this and lose lmao
|
scalabrine | 260 |
|
|
welcome back hoss
|
Hoss311 | 87 |
|
|
this game looks like a blowout on paper..i wonder why the line is so low
|
FunkFreaker | 56 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Yessss88: Thank you for your late post i dont get why u always say late post? He posted over an hour before the game
|
boybawang | 3 |
|
|
2-1 again. If we're at least positive most days, we're in for a good season
|
Bingogo | 13 |
|
|
You're doing spreads now? Before you just picked the team and not the spread number
|
Bingogo | 13 |
|
|
Welcome back Bingogo, there are us who remember you! Excited
|
Bingogo | 13 |
|
|
where do u see spread bets?
|
YuBuuBuu | 12 |
|
|
Sorry straight wagers, ur the one who hosted the thread right?
|
AussieDownUnder | 20 |
|
|
you've been on fire aussie, nice hit on celtics!
Is there going to be that thread u had last season where all the best cappers posted their picks and records where kept? It was awesome. You're doing amazing alone though
|
AussieDownUnder | 20 |
|
|
dude where do u see lakers 7.5? Its -4.5 everywhere
|
jhh123 | 36 |
|
|
You got anything tonight hoss?
|
Hoss311 | 87 |
|
|
Hey Spark i sent you a PM my man!
|
SPark1 | 106 |
|
|
So is the theory, if it drops points then go under and if it goes up then pick over? Or are they not correlated?
|
SPark1 | 220 |
|
|
I meant to say staying way under***
|
SPark1 | 220 |
|
|
Hey spark, so today the warriors total dropped from like 230 to 229 a couple minutes before tipoff... is that a recipe to pick under? Right now it seems like its staying way over with gs scoring 15pts 1st q...we'll see what happens.
But so did your theory apply to this or am i wrong?
|
SPark1 | 220 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SPark1: What movement in that game? Anyways in Thunder dubs the line dropped 4 points to 222. Now at 222.5. So what I'm saying is if the line goes back up closer to the 226 mark then drops slightly right before the game, then take the under. The play is under imo, but wait and see. It's last game so lots of time to see the line move if it will And so what happens if it stays around 222-223? What do we do? For the pacers game u were saying that if it goes from-2 to -3 then pacers is a good bet. I was wondering why
|
SPark1 | 220 |
|