Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
I got on the Pacers +210. Got the price I wanted all day.
|
chicubs09 | 7 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by RavensOsNHoes:
Now that everyone is on the Pacers OKC will completely steamroll. Watch. Going extra large on OKC
Except that it's a gross exaggeration to say that everyone is on the Pacers when that is not the case. |
ActionMagnet | 6 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by chicubs09:
@MrBator
Are you on the Pacers? I feel Okc could win straight up and pacers still cover ats.
I'm on the Pacers +4.5 -110 and +200 in the 1st half and +6.5 -110 for the game. I intend to get on the moneyline later. |
chicubs09 | 7 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by CCYCO:
@Thatguy1 Gotta love these internet keyboard tough guys that have no idea what they are talking about or what I bet and win. Go kick rocks loser. I will be at the pay window. I bet more than $10 and I make more than you in a day than you do all year. I also have the Pacers +5000 future at the beginning of the year and doubled down before the playoffs started. And I won way more than $10 on Tuesday betting the Pacers ML and game 1 on the Pacers ML. Go upstairs in your mom’s basement and tell her to make you some more pizza pockets. I could buy your mom’s house with what I’ve won on the Pacers you smuck. Tell your mom to keep the porch light on for me
Oh, I didn't reaiize you guys know each other. |
badlands | 16 |
|
![]() |
A win tonight would be their tenth this postseason as an underdog, tying the NBA record. |
chicubs09 | 7 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by peter0105:
Hi Mr. Bator. From the things you've pointed out, would you consider taking Pacers first half or Pacers full game?
The longer the game goes, the more time the Thunder must keep it together mentally, and that's been an issue for them in the playoffs, so I'd prefer the Pacers for the full game.
|
magicmike45 | 11 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by mikesomoney:
taking my winnings from MMA and 401K series bet and once again betting thunder series for free easy money -300. I’ll be super loaded after this
If I had money on the Thunder to win this series, I'd be trembling after observing the certainty and arrogance of this OP. How can he still not be concerned after witnessing two huge failures by his team in the first three games?
What's it gonna take for him to realize that the Thunder team we've seen in these playoffs is not the asskicking machine we watched for 82 regular season games?
|
mikesomoney | 40 |
|
![]() |
Something hasn't been right with this Thunder team in these playoffs. Yes, they've recorded eight blowouts at home, but in their other eleven games? 0-11 ATS!
|
magicmike45 | 11 |
|
![]() |
The Pacers were 29-11 at home in the regular season and have gone 7-2 at home in the playoffs. |
magicmike45 | 11 |
|
![]() |
A 36-13 home team getting 6 points. That sounds even better than a 35-13 home team getting 5.5 points. |
magicmike45 | 11 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Ggcjay929:
@MrBator The stats about home team covering in the pacers game are irrelevant IMO as the Thunder are a whole different animal compared to who the Pacers played -Bucks, Cavs, Knicks.
That's true. The Thunder are 0-8 ATS on the road while the Bucks, Cavs, and Knicks each managed to cover the spread in at least one of their road games. |
Ggcjay929 | 21 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by StraightWagers:
what's also interesting is in the Pacer/Knick series the home team led at half in all 6 games...now in this 3 games series the home team has led at half in every game, that's a 9-0 run for home team up at half in Pacers games, crazy
It's actually eleven games in a row if you go back to Games 4 and 5 against Cleveland. The Pacers led 80-39 at home in Game 4 and the Cavs led 56-52 at home in Game 5. |
Ggcjay929 | 21 |
|
![]() |
The Thunder are a perfect 5-0 SU & ATS in the 1st halves following a loss in these playoffs but I believe that tomorrow they will drop to 5-1.
They won those 1st halves by impressive scores of 87-56, 42-36, 60-46, 65-57, and 59-41, but on Friday night I would not bank on this to happen again. I think the second youngest team to ever reach The Finals is already a beaten team. |
Ggcjay929 | 21 |
|
![]() |
Zach Agnos’ ERA in his last 6 appearances is 21.20.
Is that bad? |
Limitlessxp | 7 |
|
![]() |
Just missed nailing the final score. The defense of Karl-Anthony Towns allowed a couple too many layups and alley oop dunks.
Still a great call on the Pacers and their team total! |
jdukes0004 | 22 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by MDizzle23:
Pacers is the play, just want a safer version Knicks is definitely not the play
And that’s when we knew the Knicks were the play. |
MDizzle23 | 10 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Knicks -4. I can’t see NY Losing Every Home Game to the Pacers -Pride /Fans
in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
You might be giving the knicks too much credit. Knicks have left the building and are looking forward to summer vacation, especially knowing they would have zero chance against OKC, so might as well end it now.
They’re not quitters. They’re not the T-Wolves nor are they the Smeltics. |
RayRayK | 16 |
|
![]() |
He wasn’t a fraud at home until tonight. His home ERA was 1.46, so I bet on his team +1.5 -138. So I think that explains his troubles this evening. |
Winningbettor | 5 |
|
![]() |
This was a sensational play, DvsRob. The Mets were in an awful flat spot in their schedule today and their bats were DEAD this afternoon. And the White Sox bats can be counted on to do little no matter the situation. |
DvsRob | 5 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by papamo:
When Dame Charles Barkley announced at halftime that this game was over, that was the kiss of death for Pacer backers.
He did that?
|
smellybunty | 17 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.