If the result of entering a thread is to make petty combative jabs or off topic nonsense then please just avoid the member threads entirely because it is obvious what several in this thread are doing and this is not the location for messages in that fashion, there are plenty of threads in the box where some of you are sharing your true colors and I would ask that you keep it there and stop provoking other members.
#4....#5
@Rush51
So I'm curious why jurisdictions would continuously cycle individuals through the system. I'm sure some of it is the writing of laws (vastly different by venue and political make up). I'm sure some of it is interpretation of the law (also vastly different). I'm sure infrastructure plays a part also.
But the one thing I can't get away is the idea that there is so much to be gained in distribution of tax money on the front end of the system (lawyers, judges, support staff) than the back end (prisons). Haven't dug into the nuts and bolts of it, but there usually is a reason different than the reason given.
I also ponder why you rarely see 10-35× repeat DUI offenders.
Don't let the book set the number
0
If the result of entering a thread is to make petty combative jabs or off topic nonsense then please just avoid the member threads entirely because it is obvious what several in this thread are doing and this is not the location for messages in that fashion, there are plenty of threads in the box where some of you are sharing your true colors and I would ask that you keep it there and stop provoking other members.
#4....#5
@Rush51
So I'm curious why jurisdictions would continuously cycle individuals through the system. I'm sure some of it is the writing of laws (vastly different by venue and political make up). I'm sure some of it is interpretation of the law (also vastly different). I'm sure infrastructure plays a part also.
But the one thing I can't get away is the idea that there is so much to be gained in distribution of tax money on the front end of the system (lawyers, judges, support staff) than the back end (prisons). Haven't dug into the nuts and bolts of it, but there usually is a reason different than the reason given.
I also ponder why you rarely see 10-35× repeat DUI offenders.
It has everything to do with " the enforcement " of laws already on the books, and not " interpretation." The progressive Dems just choose to ignore laws ( witness our southern border as another prime example of this behavior by Dems).
As I stated earlier, the reason why progressive Mayors, Judges, DAs , etc. in our cities go lenient on crime is because they feel society is to blame for the crimes committed by these perps....there is no accountability by the perps, and therefore the repercussions are a slap on the hand. What a bunch of idiots our dear Dem leaders are; this only encourages the activity by the perps to continue.
2
@unplucked_gem
It has everything to do with " the enforcement " of laws already on the books, and not " interpretation." The progressive Dems just choose to ignore laws ( witness our southern border as another prime example of this behavior by Dems).
As I stated earlier, the reason why progressive Mayors, Judges, DAs , etc. in our cities go lenient on crime is because they feel society is to blame for the crimes committed by these perps....there is no accountability by the perps, and therefore the repercussions are a slap on the hand. What a bunch of idiots our dear Dem leaders are; this only encourages the activity by the perps to continue.
Crime is nonpartisan. Multiple factors influence crime rates. For examples, economic hardship, demographics and others. Democratic and republican mayors have little influence on police department budgets or sizes. Neither political party has done a better job at reducing crime. But overall, US crime rates have fallen during last 3 decades.
0
Crime is nonpartisan. Multiple factors influence crime rates. For examples, economic hardship, demographics and others. Democratic and republican mayors have little influence on police department budgets or sizes. Neither political party has done a better job at reducing crime. But overall, US crime rates have fallen during last 3 decades.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.