Nice response. I see you're on your F game as usual
======================
Here dum-dum, since you can't think logically, let me help you.
1. CD claims that there are no jobs because of population growth and they "go overseas"
2. I respond by pointing out that jobs go overseas because of taxes & regulation and Steve Jobs told Obama this
3. CD responds that Steve Jobs is a scumbag and talks about dumping chemicals in the river
4. I point out software companies don't dump chemicals in the river (you jump in like a poo flinging monkey and decide to beclown self) and add that just because you're for less regulation doesn't mean you're for dumping chemicals in rivers
5. You can't grasp this because _____?
Nice response. I see you're on your F game as usual
======================
Here dum-dum, since you can't think logically, let me help you.
1. CD claims that there are no jobs because of population growth and they "go overseas"
2. I respond by pointing out that jobs go overseas because of taxes & regulation and Steve Jobs told Obama this
3. CD responds that Steve Jobs is a scumbag and talks about dumping chemicals in the river
4. I point out software companies don't dump chemicals in the river (you jump in like a poo flinging monkey and decide to beclown self) and add that just because you're for less regulation doesn't mean you're for dumping chemicals in rivers
5. You can't grasp this because _____?
5. You can't grasp this because _____?
5. You can't grasp this because _____?
Regulations are never strong enough or timely enough.
==================================
So is the answer to just have 1 billion regulations?
Or just have every company owned by the government?
Regulations are never strong enough or timely enough.
==================================
So is the answer to just have 1 billion regulations?
Or just have every company owned by the government?
Regulations are never strong enough or timely enough.
==================================
So is the answer to just have 1 billion regulations?
Or just have every company owned by the government?
Regulations are never strong enough or timely enough.
==================================
So is the answer to just have 1 billion regulations?
Or just have every company owned by the government?
Can you refute the underlying concept?
==========
Um yeah, because "the private sector controls government." is a false statement.
Can you refute the underlying concept?
==========
Um yeah, because "the private sector controls government." is a false statement.
Apple pays 7.65% of sales to income tax as of 2011
==========================
Which income tax, federal, state, local, all 3?
Their cost of sales is more like 60%, so which has more of an effect a 7.65% income tax rate or a 60% cost of sales?
=========================
Um, and what are regulatory compliance costs and why aren't they in your equation?
Apple pays 7.65% of sales to income tax as of 2011
==========================
Which income tax, federal, state, local, all 3?
Their cost of sales is more like 60%, so which has more of an effect a 7.65% income tax rate or a 60% cost of sales?
=========================
Um, and what are regulatory compliance costs and why aren't they in your equation?
Regulations are never going to be strong enough
===================
Which would be an argument for no regulations.
I mean, if seat belts were not going to work, would you put them in cars?
Regulations are never going to be strong enough
===================
Which would be an argument for no regulations.
I mean, if seat belts were not going to work, would you put them in cars?
Regulations are never going to be strong enough
===================
Which would be an argument for no regulations.
I mean, if seat belts were not going to work, would you put them in cars?
Regulations are never going to be strong enough
===================
Which would be an argument for no regulations.
I mean, if seat belts were not going to work, would you put them in cars?
Apple pays 7.65% of sales to income tax as of 2011
==========================
Which income tax, federal, state, local, all 3?
Their cost of sales is more like 60%, so which has more of an effect a 7.65% income tax rate or a 60% cost of sales?
=========================
Um, and what are regulatory compliance costs and why aren't they in your equation?
Apple pays 7.65% of sales to income tax as of 2011
==========================
Which income tax, federal, state, local, all 3?
Their cost of sales is more like 60%, so which has more of an effect a 7.65% income tax rate or a 60% cost of sales?
=========================
Um, and what are regulatory compliance costs and why aren't they in your equation?
Apple pays 7.65% of sales to income tax as of 2011.
===============================
Er, the link you provided brough up a blank page. But anyway, here are the figures:
Income before tax: $34,205,000
Income tax expense: $8,283,000
Oh, and according to this article Apple paid a 31 percent corporate tax between 2008 & 2010.
Looks like you got caught in a little lie there, buddy.
Apple pays 7.65% of sales to income tax as of 2011.
===============================
Er, the link you provided brough up a blank page. But anyway, here are the figures:
Income before tax: $34,205,000
Income tax expense: $8,283,000
Oh, and according to this article Apple paid a 31 percent corporate tax between 2008 & 2010.
Looks like you got caught in a little lie there, buddy.
Apple pays 7.65% of sales to income tax as of 2011.
===============================
Er, the link you provided brough up a blank page. But anyway, here are the figures:
Income before tax: $34,205,000
Income tax expense: $8,283,000
Oh, and according to this article Apple paid a 31 percent corporate tax between 2008 & 2010.
Looks like you got caught in a little lie there, buddy.
Apple pays 7.65% of sales to income tax as of 2011.
===============================
Er, the link you provided brough up a blank page. But anyway, here are the figures:
Income before tax: $34,205,000
Income tax expense: $8,283,000
Oh, and according to this article Apple paid a 31 percent corporate tax between 2008 & 2010.
Looks like you got caught in a little lie there, buddy.
so which has more of an effect a 7.65% income tax rate
Except they don't have a 7.65% income tax rate.
At all.
You are making stuff up.
so which has more of an effect a 7.65% income tax rate
Except they don't have a 7.65% income tax rate.
At all.
You are making stuff up.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.