You are such a simple asswipe. I said denial of equal social rights---to a whole group of people. The only thing Bill was denying Hillary -- other than the truth of the affair -- was nooky. By the way Hinkle was cheating on his wife, too. God, you are such a dope. Try thinking first next time....as if that's possible for you.
Namecalling takes balls. Its only a matter of seconds before WSC warns you about that. Oh, nevermind wrong party affiliation.. Carry on.
Back on topic...if this dude is gay he may be confused as to which party he should belong to...cause we don't put up with that and we will make sure he doesnt get re-elected.
You are such a simple asswipe. I said denial of equal social rights---to a whole group of people. The only thing Bill was denying Hillary -- other than the truth of the affair -- was nooky. By the way Hinkle was cheating on his wife, too. God, you are such a dope. Try thinking first next time....as if that's possible for you.
Namecalling takes balls. Its only a matter of seconds before WSC warns you about that. Oh, nevermind wrong party affiliation.. Carry on.
Back on topic...if this dude is gay he may be confused as to which party he should belong to...cause we don't put up with that and we will make sure he doesnt get re-elected.
Namecalling takes balls. Its only a matter of seconds before WSC warns you about that. Oh, nevermind wrong party affiliation.. Carry on.
Back on topic...if this dude is gay he may be confused as to which party he should belong to...cause we don't put up with that and we will make sure he doesnt get re-elected.
Namecalling takes balls. Its only a matter of seconds before WSC warns you about that. Oh, nevermind wrong party affiliation.. Carry on.
Back on topic...if this dude is gay he may be confused as to which party he should belong to...cause we don't put up with that and we will make sure he doesnt get re-elected.
The only agenda I have is to see you call it both ways.
Esplanade used a general term 'libstains are halarious' while uber was more direct 'You are such a simple asswipe'
I know you have warne 14 for alot less than that.
I'd guess you've warned esp before..probably more than once.
When I come accross somthing like what Uber said I instantly think to myself that someone will get warned by you. I only actually see the warning when it's someone you don't agree with.
You didn't warn cd when he went on that profane namecalling spree....but you will warn 14 just for having condescending tone.
What else could my diablolical agenda be?
If a person starts somthing the other person has free reighn?
The only agenda I have is to see you call it both ways.
Esplanade used a general term 'libstains are halarious' while uber was more direct 'You are such a simple asswipe'
I know you have warne 14 for alot less than that.
I'd guess you've warned esp before..probably more than once.
When I come accross somthing like what Uber said I instantly think to myself that someone will get warned by you. I only actually see the warning when it's someone you don't agree with.
You didn't warn cd when he went on that profane namecalling spree....but you will warn 14 just for having condescending tone.
What else could my diablolical agenda be?
If a person starts somthing the other person has free reighn?
WSC.
Seems to me in this case ESP said in essence "liberals are hilarious" while Uber said in essence "you are a 1 ply piece of toilet paper" and then called him a dope.
thus my evaluation of the events is that Uber took things a couple of steps further than ESP in this case.
the fact that he used the work 'libstain' is of no relavence to me because those guys use the word 'teabaggers' all of the time which bothers me not.
Fact is...when I first (and second) read ESPs post I didn't think that was cause for a warning but when I read Uber's 'asswhipe' an alarm went off in my head. (just like when cd went on his profanity laced, unwarned rant)
Let me ask you this...Aside from an instance or two or three, Do you feel like you call it fairly both ways?
If I could honestly recall you warning one of those guys who you disagree with then I would never have said anything in the first place.
The first time I raised an eyebrow is when cd went on his famous profanity rant and he never got the warning he should have. Maybe thats why some people that agree with you think they can go unchecked.
Honestly, I'm not trying to cause problems, rather just trying to guilt you into checking both sides because you seem to think that the responder has free reighn to say what he wants if someone takes a small jab at him.
WSC.
Seems to me in this case ESP said in essence "liberals are hilarious" while Uber said in essence "you are a 1 ply piece of toilet paper" and then called him a dope.
thus my evaluation of the events is that Uber took things a couple of steps further than ESP in this case.
the fact that he used the work 'libstain' is of no relavence to me because those guys use the word 'teabaggers' all of the time which bothers me not.
Fact is...when I first (and second) read ESPs post I didn't think that was cause for a warning but when I read Uber's 'asswhipe' an alarm went off in my head. (just like when cd went on his profanity laced, unwarned rant)
Let me ask you this...Aside from an instance or two or three, Do you feel like you call it fairly both ways?
If I could honestly recall you warning one of those guys who you disagree with then I would never have said anything in the first place.
The first time I raised an eyebrow is when cd went on his famous profanity rant and he never got the warning he should have. Maybe thats why some people that agree with you think they can go unchecked.
Honestly, I'm not trying to cause problems, rather just trying to guilt you into checking both sides because you seem to think that the responder has free reighn to say what he wants if someone takes a small jab at him.
If I could honestly recall you warning one of those guys who you disagree with then I would never have said anything in the first place.
You know what I meant to say.
If I could honestly recall you warning one of those guys who you disagree with then I would never have said anything in the first place.
You know what I meant to say.
WSC.
Seems to me in this case ESP said in essence "liberals are hilarious" while Uber said in essence "you are a 1 ply piece of toilet paper" and then called him a dope.
thus my evaluation of the events is that Uber took things a couple of steps further than ESP in this case.
the fact that he used the work 'libstain' is of no relavence to me because those guys use the word 'teabaggers' all of the time which bothers me not.
Fact is...when I first (and second) read ESPs post I didn't think that was cause for a warning but when I read Uber's 'asswhipe' an alarm went off in my head. (just like when cd went on his profanity laced, unwarned rant)
Let me ask you this...Aside from an instance or two or three, Do you feel like you call it fairly both ways?
If I could honestly recall you warning one of those guys who you disagree with then I would never have said anything in the first place.
The first time I raised an eyebrow is when cd went on his famous profanity rant and he never got the warning he should have. Maybe thats why some people that agree with you think they can go unchecked.
Honestly, I'm not trying to cause problems, rather just trying to guilt you into checking both sides because you seem to think that the responder has free reighn to say what he wants if someone takes a small jab at him.
WSC.
Seems to me in this case ESP said in essence "liberals are hilarious" while Uber said in essence "you are a 1 ply piece of toilet paper" and then called him a dope.
thus my evaluation of the events is that Uber took things a couple of steps further than ESP in this case.
the fact that he used the work 'libstain' is of no relavence to me because those guys use the word 'teabaggers' all of the time which bothers me not.
Fact is...when I first (and second) read ESPs post I didn't think that was cause for a warning but when I read Uber's 'asswhipe' an alarm went off in my head. (just like when cd went on his profanity laced, unwarned rant)
Let me ask you this...Aside from an instance or two or three, Do you feel like you call it fairly both ways?
If I could honestly recall you warning one of those guys who you disagree with then I would never have said anything in the first place.
The first time I raised an eyebrow is when cd went on his famous profanity rant and he never got the warning he should have. Maybe thats why some people that agree with you think they can go unchecked.
Honestly, I'm not trying to cause problems, rather just trying to guilt you into checking both sides because you seem to think that the responder has free reighn to say what he wants if someone takes a small jab at him.
I'll take tiresome over childish ANY DAY.
Take notes that all the push back is from the same group that mostly agrees with WSC and therefore has free reighn to say whatever you want with impunity.
Go back and look at 14 getting a warning for merely calling someone a liar. Then look at cd's profanity laced tirade that got no attention at all.
Then #36 watch stiln become quite the hypicrit AGAIN. Like he's never whined before....tsk tsk
I'll take tiresome over childish ANY DAY.
Take notes that all the push back is from the same group that mostly agrees with WSC and therefore has free reighn to say whatever you want with impunity.
Go back and look at 14 getting a warning for merely calling someone a liar. Then look at cd's profanity laced tirade that got no attention at all.
Then #36 watch stiln become quite the hypicrit AGAIN. Like he's never whined before....tsk tsk
I'll take tiresome over childish ANY DAY.
Take notes that all the push back is from the same group that mostly agrees with WSC and therefore has free reighn to say whatever you want with impunity.
Go back and look at 14 getting a warning for merely calling someone a liar. Then look at cd's profanity laced tirade that got no attention at all.
Then #36 watch stiln become quite the hypicrit AGAIN. Like he's never whined before....tsk tsk
I'll take tiresome over childish ANY DAY.
Take notes that all the push back is from the same group that mostly agrees with WSC and therefore has free reighn to say whatever you want with impunity.
Go back and look at 14 getting a warning for merely calling someone a liar. Then look at cd's profanity laced tirade that got no attention at all.
Then #36 watch stiln become quite the hypicrit AGAIN. Like he's never whined before....tsk tsk
dl36 and stiln...I'm going to make a new rule.
If you squat to take a piss over 98% of the time (even when you're not taking a dump) you're not allowed to respond to my posts.
dl36 and stiln...I'm going to make a new rule.
If you squat to take a piss over 98% of the time (even when you're not taking a dump) you're not allowed to respond to my posts.
Dl36,
I'll tell you what "Covers knows"..........
Covers knows you are acting like a Cowardly Lion feeling brave ...bashing me unprovoked ,because you think I'm safely away in the PBox...
..that's what Covers knows .. and if they didn't know it before they know it now .............
If anyone should be in the PBox for making repeated ..antagonizing and instigating post it should be You ...............
Dl36,
I'll tell you what "Covers knows"..........
Covers knows you are acting like a Cowardly Lion feeling brave ...bashing me unprovoked ,because you think I'm safely away in the PBox...
..that's what Covers knows .. and if they didn't know it before they know it now .............
If anyone should be in the PBox for making repeated ..antagonizing and instigating post it should be You ...............
[Quote: Originally Posted by dl36]
But please continue your wannabe moderator duties... dont you have a thread that doesnt follow your rhetoric to call "unpolitical"?
[Quote]
Haven't really been paying attention dl36...I've been busy handicapping the NFL Pre-Season ..while I have been on administrative leave...
..as displayed by the 5 big RED stars in my upper right hand corner ..But thank you for asking ...
[Quote: Originally Posted by dl36]
But please continue your wannabe moderator duties... dont you have a thread that doesnt follow your rhetoric to call "unpolitical"?
[Quote]
Haven't really been paying attention dl36...I've been busy handicapping the NFL Pre-Season ..while I have been on administrative leave...
..as displayed by the 5 big RED stars in my upper right hand corner ..But thank you for asking ...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.