Osgood hasn't had to handle a superstar sniper yet in the playoffs
So NASH, GETZLAF and KANE are no good then.
Nash was invisible. Kane was scared to get hit and could only score when wide open. Getzlaf had 4 goals.
In the regular season these guys were snipers. In the playoffs - they were not. The closest guys being called snipers that Osgood saw were Sharp and Perry.... I know what you're saying here. I just hope you get what I'm trying to say...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pucksrus:
Osgood hasn't had to handle a superstar sniper yet in the playoffs
So NASH, GETZLAF and KANE are no good then.
Nash was invisible. Kane was scared to get hit and could only score when wide open. Getzlaf had 4 goals.
In the regular season these guys were snipers. In the playoffs - they were not. The closest guys being called snipers that Osgood saw were Sharp and Perry.... I know what you're saying here. I just hope you get what I'm trying to say...
Nash was invisible. Kane was scared to get hit and could only score when wide open. Getzlaf had 4 goals.
In the regular season these guys were snipers. In the playoffs - they were not. The closest guys being called snipers that Osgood saw were Sharp and Perry.... I know what you're saying here. I just hope you get what I'm trying to say...
Yes I do.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Berty:
Nash was invisible. Kane was scared to get hit and could only score when wide open. Getzlaf had 4 goals.
In the regular season these guys were snipers. In the playoffs - they were not. The closest guys being called snipers that Osgood saw were Sharp and Perry.... I know what you're saying here. I just hope you get what I'm trying to say...
Lidstrom, Kronwall, Stuart, erricsoon, Rafalski, and co will the crap out of the Cindy& Geno. They haven't faced a discipline D like this in the their run to the finals.
Be over in 5. Too talented and loaded with depth. The Pens D won't be able to handle them. Hossa's gonna run wild!!!
We want the cup we want the cup!
0
Lidstrom, Kronwall, Stuart, erricsoon, Rafalski, and co will the crap out of the Cindy& Geno. They haven't faced a discipline D like this in the their run to the finals.
Be over in 5. Too talented and loaded with depth. The Pens D won't be able to handle them. Hossa's gonna run wild!!!
No doubt Osgood benefits from Wings D but the guy is very steady and never out of position. His current goal-tending style fits his team perfectly, they don't often ask him to make the spectacular save, just be steady and in pos. I can remember only 1 soft goal he's given up so far and that's the tie-ing goal yesterday.
No question Fleury has made the more spectacular saves in play-off but goaltending is combo of D and and goaltender himself so how can anyone possibly criticize Osgood's #'s and performance in play-off, esp when he's already won last yr. If Lids/Dats play all games in Final, hard to not favor Wings.
0
No doubt Osgood benefits from Wings D but the guy is very steady and never out of position. His current goal-tending style fits his team perfectly, they don't often ask him to make the spectacular save, just be steady and in pos. I can remember only 1 soft goal he's given up so far and that's the tie-ing goal yesterday.
No question Fleury has made the more spectacular saves in play-off but goaltending is combo of D and and goaltender himself so how can anyone possibly criticize Osgood's #'s and performance in play-off, esp when he's already won last yr. If Lids/Dats play all games in Final, hard to not favor Wings.
Carolina did the Penguins no favors by playing subpar hockey in the Conf Finals. The Wings took on a much tougher opponent and they may be banged up as a result. But this is hockey and you can play with the pain but when the passing lanes aren't there like they have been the last 4 games the road gets rough. How many of the Penguins goals were off stupid turnovers. The Wings just don't play that way. Wings in 6 or 7
0
Carolina did the Penguins no favors by playing subpar hockey in the Conf Finals. The Wings took on a much tougher opponent and they may be banged up as a result. But this is hockey and you can play with the pain but when the passing lanes aren't there like they have been the last 4 games the road gets rough. How many of the Penguins goals were off stupid turnovers. The Wings just don't play that way. Wings in 6 or 7
He's just gonna spew the same shit he's been say sayings, Wings are old, Ozzie is the weak link blah blah blah....he's an Avs fan. The guy has a hate on for the champ.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Johnnypicks:
Looking forard to hearing from RWSuck
He's just gonna spew the same shit he's been say sayings, Wings are old, Ozzie is the weak link blah blah blah....he's an Avs fan. The guy has a hate on for the champ.
I'm a Penguins fan and that's about the way I see it, BUT I would say a few more than JUST two players for my Pens recently with the play of Fleury (BUT he's either VERY good or VERY bad and needs better rebound control), Gonchar, Guerin, Staal (as a D forward) and Fedotenko.
all things being equal, the RW's have the greater depth. you had to be impressed that they could lose two of their top players the last two games of the Bhawks series and STILL win.
I think one thing that might help the Penguins is that really shitty B2B to start the finals. they MAY, if they get lucky, get a split in Detroit which could extend the series to 6 or 7. if NOT it's probably RW's in 5 because they will get at least one win in the numbers 3 and 4 games in Pittsburgh.
in any case, it's more likely going to be an RW's repeat.
0
pittsburgh is 2 players...red wings are 4 lines.
I'm a Penguins fan and that's about the way I see it, BUT I would say a few more than JUST two players for my Pens recently with the play of Fleury (BUT he's either VERY good or VERY bad and needs better rebound control), Gonchar, Guerin, Staal (as a D forward) and Fedotenko.
all things being equal, the RW's have the greater depth. you had to be impressed that they could lose two of their top players the last two games of the Bhawks series and STILL win.
I think one thing that might help the Penguins is that really shitty B2B to start the finals. they MAY, if they get lucky, get a split in Detroit which could extend the series to 6 or 7. if NOT it's probably RW's in 5 because they will get at least one win in the numbers 3 and 4 games in Pittsburgh.
in any case, it's more likely going to be an RW's repeat.
Rink, while not always on the scoresheet, you do not think that Staal, Kennedy, Talbot, Cooke, Feds, Kunitz, Guerin, and even recently Satan and Adams have been positive contributors in teh last month? While they lack consistent scoring contribution, I think their overall play has been positive. Some of the scoring success that Sid/Geno have had is due to their good support play IMO.
I think you can say the Wings have better scoring depth, but I do not think this is anywhere near two players vs four lines.
0
Rink, while not always on the scoresheet, you do not think that Staal, Kennedy, Talbot, Cooke, Feds, Kunitz, Guerin, and even recently Satan and Adams have been positive contributors in teh last month? While they lack consistent scoring contribution, I think their overall play has been positive. Some of the scoring success that Sid/Geno have had is due to their good support play IMO.
I think you can say the Wings have better scoring depth, but I do not think this is anywhere near two players vs four lines.
Rink, while not always on the scoresheet, you do not think that Staal, Kennedy, Talbot, Cooke, Feds, Kunitz, Guerin, and even recently Satan and Adams have been positive contributors in teh last month? While they lack consistent scoring contribution, I think their overall play has been positive. Some of the scoring success that Sid/Geno have had is due to their good support play IMO.
I think you can say the Wings have better scoring depth, but I do not think this is anywhere near two players vs four lines.
B/C Sid and Malkin are running away with the race, people think that they only have 2 players contributing. Open up playoff scoring from NHL.com in 2 windows and compare Pittsburgh and Detroit head to head in scoring. Pitts actually has okay secondary scoring! Kunitz, Guerin, Fedotenko... it's not that lop-sided. The +/- on the other hand.... hoo boy. Pitts better stay outta the box....
0
Quote Originally Posted by JTFinn:
Rink, while not always on the scoresheet, you do not think that Staal, Kennedy, Talbot, Cooke, Feds, Kunitz, Guerin, and even recently Satan and Adams have been positive contributors in teh last month? While they lack consistent scoring contribution, I think their overall play has been positive. Some of the scoring success that Sid/Geno have had is due to their good support play IMO.
I think you can say the Wings have better scoring depth, but I do not think this is anywhere near two players vs four lines.
B/C Sid and Malkin are running away with the race, people think that they only have 2 players contributing. Open up playoff scoring from NHL.com in 2 windows and compare Pittsburgh and Detroit head to head in scoring. Pitts actually has okay secondary scoring! Kunitz, Guerin, Fedotenko... it's not that lop-sided. The +/- on the other hand.... hoo boy. Pitts better stay outta the box....
Osgood has been the better of the two goaltenders so far this playoffs. He was huge in the 2nd period against the Hawks last night. Guess what folks, the Hawks are a more talented team then the Pens - not saying their better, but more talented.
Lidstrom will be ready to go in game 1 and that is HUGE. Ericsson and Datsyuk will be soon to follow, game-time decisions in game 1.
Whats interesting for me is to see how Pittsburgh's D will match up against the Wings forwards and depth. Detroit might be banged up which will be a factor, but they are playoff ready. Pittsburgh has had any easy ride so far.
They lucked out not getting Boston in two straight series, by the time Carolina got to them they didn't have anything left. Washington is a joke, no defense what so ever. The only person scoring on that team was Ovechkin. Semin was asleep, Backstrom was ok.
Let's see what the Pens got against the Wings top 4 D. Fluery will have to steal a game or two for them to win this series which if he plays well, he's capable of.
Wings in 7.
0
Osgood has been the better of the two goaltenders so far this playoffs. He was huge in the 2nd period against the Hawks last night. Guess what folks, the Hawks are a more talented team then the Pens - not saying their better, but more talented.
Lidstrom will be ready to go in game 1 and that is HUGE. Ericsson and Datsyuk will be soon to follow, game-time decisions in game 1.
Whats interesting for me is to see how Pittsburgh's D will match up against the Wings forwards and depth. Detroit might be banged up which will be a factor, but they are playoff ready. Pittsburgh has had any easy ride so far.
They lucked out not getting Boston in two straight series, by the time Carolina got to them they didn't have anything left. Washington is a joke, no defense what so ever. The only person scoring on that team was Ovechkin. Semin was asleep, Backstrom was ok.
Let's see what the Pens got against the Wings top 4 D. Fluery will have to steal a game or two for them to win this series which if he plays well, he's capable of.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.