Rams-10 x4..... I just can't see Carolina staying with the Rams today, Stafford would have to do the three turnover thing again and I think he's well aware to take care of that ball today... I also think the rain hurts Carolina because they just .... Suck on offense....31-17
This will be just the 4th time since division realignment in 2002 where that team who lost recently is a favorite of over a TD (-7.5) or more:
2015-16 Broncos: Won (-7.5), 23-16 vs. Steelers 2009-10 Colts: Won (-8.5), 30-17 vs. Jets 2004-05 Colts: Won (-11), 49-24 vs. Broncos
QBs making their first playoff start vs QBs who have playoff experience are 20-39-1 ATS (34%) and 20-40 SU since 2002. When those less experienced QBs play at home, which all three are this week, they are 12-21 SU and ATS.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Rams-10 x4..... I just can't see Carolina staying with the Rams today, Stafford would have to do the three turnover thing again and I think he's well aware to take care of that ball today... I also think the rain hurts Carolina because they just .... Suck on offense....31-17
This will be just the 4th time since division realignment in 2002 where that team who lost recently is a favorite of over a TD (-7.5) or more:
2015-16 Broncos: Won (-7.5), 23-16 vs. Steelers 2009-10 Colts: Won (-8.5), 30-17 vs. Jets 2004-05 Colts: Won (-11), 49-24 vs. Broncos
QBs making their first playoff start vs QBs who have playoff experience are 20-39-1 ATS (34%) and 20-40 SU since 2002. When those less experienced QBs play at home, which all three are this week, they are 12-21 SU and ATS.
Rams-10 x4..... I just can't see Carolina staying with the Rams today, Stafford would have to do the three turnover thing again and I think he's well aware to take care of that ball today... I also think the rain hurts Carolina because they just .... Suck on offense....31-17 This will be just the 4th time since division realignment in 2002 where that team who lost recently is a favorite of over a TD (-7.5) or more: 2015-16 Broncos: Won (-7.5), 23-16 vs. Steelers2009-10 Colts: Won (-8.5), 30-17 vs. Jets2004-05 Colts: Won (-11), 49-24 vs. Broncos QBs making their first playoff start vs QBs who have playoff experience are 20-39-1 ATS (34%) and 20-40 SU since 2002. When those less experienced QBs play at home, which all three are this week, they are 12-21 SU and ATS.
Broncos won the SB '15
Colts lost the SB '09
0
Quote Originally Posted by JUSTWINBABY61:
Rams-10 x4..... I just can't see Carolina staying with the Rams today, Stafford would have to do the three turnover thing again and I think he's well aware to take care of that ball today... I also think the rain hurts Carolina because they just .... Suck on offense....31-17 This will be just the 4th time since division realignment in 2002 where that team who lost recently is a favorite of over a TD (-7.5) or more: 2015-16 Broncos: Won (-7.5), 23-16 vs. Steelers2009-10 Colts: Won (-8.5), 30-17 vs. Jets2004-05 Colts: Won (-11), 49-24 vs. Broncos QBs making their first playoff start vs QBs who have playoff experience are 20-39-1 ATS (34%) and 20-40 SU since 2002. When those less experienced QBs play at home, which all three are this week, they are 12-21 SU and ATS.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.