Havent seen "Sharp action" (worst name on covers) or sciegel around for about a month....they only troll waiting for the bad days....I hope they rot in hell
On to this week....
NE -6.5 ....I like Detroit, and have bet them almost every week....but, they have not seen a qb like Brady yet....I think NE puts up 34 minimum and 48 wouldnt surprise me
NE O50.5 ......see above
Dallas +4.5 ...Jason Garrett is a better coach than Wade Phillips
Dallas O51 ....Dallas wins this game 31-28
Cincy/Jets O43 ........Jets should be good for 31
Pitt -6 .....I'm not explaining
Jax +7.5 ....Just think this is the type of game the Jags make ugly
Atl/GB O47.5 .....Lean Atl ....both teams should reach the 20s
KC pk .....the chiefs are somehow still under the radar
Philly -3 ....Vick is the mvp right now in the NFC and maybe nfl
SD +3 .....Rivers will get this done somehow
kinda like Baltimore, but will wait and see if it drops below a td....
Havent seen "Sharp action" (worst name on covers) or sciegel around for about a month....they only troll waiting for the bad days....I hope they rot in hell
On to this week....
NE -6.5 ....I like Detroit, and have bet them almost every week....but, they have not seen a qb like Brady yet....I think NE puts up 34 minimum and 48 wouldnt surprise me
NE O50.5 ......see above
Dallas +4.5 ...Jason Garrett is a better coach than Wade Phillips
Dallas O51 ....Dallas wins this game 31-28
Cincy/Jets O43 ........Jets should be good for 31
Pitt -6 .....I'm not explaining
Jax +7.5 ....Just think this is the type of game the Jags make ugly
Atl/GB O47.5 .....Lean Atl ....both teams should reach the 20s
KC pk .....the chiefs are somehow still under the radar
Philly -3 ....Vick is the mvp right now in the NFC and maybe nfl
SD +3 .....Rivers will get this done somehow
kinda like Baltimore, but will wait and see if it drops below a td....
So I will turn her into a lesbian huh?........The only thing that disappoints me more than that comment is the fact that you haven't posted any 16 team parlays lately.....you're slacking bro......
So I will turn her into a lesbian huh?........The only thing that disappoints me more than that comment is the fact that you haven't posted any 16 team parlays lately.....you're slacking bro......
So I will turn her into a lesbian huh?........The only thing that disappoints me more than that comment is the fact that you haven't posted any 16 team parlays lately.....you're slacking bro......
Detroit +7
Detroit UNDER
Dallas +4
Dallas UNDER
Cinci +9
Cinci OVER
Now that parlay will turn YOU into a man
I thought it was pretty funny
I posted a 120-1 5 team please rlast week that hit and well and the Balimore winning margin bet....
Your parlay would only be taken by me if you bet all the dogs on the ML with the unders....instead of 45-1 you would be lookin at 200-1 or better ....add the Atl over and SD ml and now you've got about 800-1.....real man stuff
So I will turn her into a lesbian huh?........The only thing that disappoints me more than that comment is the fact that you haven't posted any 16 team parlays lately.....you're slacking bro......
Detroit +7
Detroit UNDER
Dallas +4
Dallas UNDER
Cinci +9
Cinci OVER
Now that parlay will turn YOU into a man
I thought it was pretty funny
I posted a 120-1 5 team please rlast week that hit and well and the Balimore winning margin bet....
Your parlay would only be taken by me if you bet all the dogs on the ML with the unders....instead of 45-1 you would be lookin at 200-1 or better ....add the Atl over and SD ml and now you've got about 800-1.....real man stuff
Was just thinking about playing all of the totals OVER this week that are lined at 47 or higher. Do you think that will get me ???
You seem to lean that way also. 47 is kind of a high number for the NFL, and you need a lot of things to go your way to go OVER that number. It didn't work out for the whole world who was on it in MNF the other day.
Maybe you should just bet them blind even. Seems like a LOCK.
Was just thinking about playing all of the totals OVER this week that are lined at 47 or higher. Do you think that will get me ???
You seem to lean that way also. 47 is kind of a high number for the NFL, and you need a lot of things to go your way to go OVER that number. It didn't work out for the whole world who was on it in MNF the other day.
Maybe you should just bet them blind even. Seems like a LOCK.
Real... playing a couple of totals OVER that high in the NFL in same week is dumb.
I think you're wrong on DET also, pats are an older, veteran team and coming off the short week after a very long, grind it out win against Indy. A TD is a lot to lay in this spot I think
motivational angle for Lions to perform in this spot before goodell yanks their turkey day privilege away from them. Their heads will be very much in this game. this is TRADITION we're talking about!!!
Belichick is great at getting his guys prepared, as much as I hate him. But you never know... Tom Bieber's foot has been giving him problems also, he didn't practice again yesterday, his hair has been getting in his eyes too much.
If they can muster up a couple of big plays against this NE secondary (which I think they can), they're going to compete on Thursday.
Real... playing a couple of totals OVER that high in the NFL in same week is dumb.
I think you're wrong on DET also, pats are an older, veteran team and coming off the short week after a very long, grind it out win against Indy. A TD is a lot to lay in this spot I think
motivational angle for Lions to perform in this spot before goodell yanks their turkey day privilege away from them. Their heads will be very much in this game. this is TRADITION we're talking about!!!
Belichick is great at getting his guys prepared, as much as I hate him. But you never know... Tom Bieber's foot has been giving him problems also, he didn't practice again yesterday, his hair has been getting in his eyes too much.
If they can muster up a couple of big plays against this NE secondary (which I think they can), they're going to compete on Thursday.
Real... playing a couple of totals OVER that high in the NFL in same week is dumb.
I think you're wrong on DET also, pats are an older, veteran team and coming off the short week after a very long, grind it out win against Indy. A TD is a lot to lay in this spot I think
motivational angle for Lions to perform in this spot before goodell yanks their turkey day privilege away from them. Their heads will be very much in this game. this is TRADITION we're talking about!!!
Belichick is great at getting his guys prepared, as much as I hate him. But you never know... Tom Bieber's foot has been giving him problems also, he didn't practice again yesterday, his hair has been getting in his eyes too much.
If they can muster up a couple of big plays against this NE secondary (which I think they can), they're going to compete on Thursday.
Real... playing a couple of totals OVER that high in the NFL in same week is dumb.
I think you're wrong on DET also, pats are an older, veteran team and coming off the short week after a very long, grind it out win against Indy. A TD is a lot to lay in this spot I think
motivational angle for Lions to perform in this spot before goodell yanks their turkey day privilege away from them. Their heads will be very much in this game. this is TRADITION we're talking about!!!
Belichick is great at getting his guys prepared, as much as I hate him. But you never know... Tom Bieber's foot has been giving him problems also, he didn't practice again yesterday, his hair has been getting in his eyes too much.
If they can muster up a couple of big plays against this NE secondary (which I think they can), they're going to compete on Thursday.
You provide no reasoning/analysis behind your picks, you couldn't debate back and defend them, that's pathetic.
At least I make an argument for a side, and stick with it. Say what you want, but that's handicapping
What you do is a joke
What reasoning do you want? Stats and injury reprots that everyone knows? Trends that go back to the 1980s? Weather reports? Tom Brady being gay rumors?
Handicapping isnt making an argument for a side, because an argument can be made for either side, thats the whole point.
Bottomline, I pick winners. You TALK about how good you are, but dont back it up. Last 3 weeks I have won including 2 10-5 weeks, some juicy ML dogs and a 120-1 pleaser...all posted...
Why would I debate my picks? I have already played them and thats obviously the side I like. You coming in here saying picking the overs is dumb.....just like last week when you said betting all favs was dumb....until they almost swept the board....
Handicapping isnt having info, its knowing what to do with it.
You provide no reasoning/analysis behind your picks, you couldn't debate back and defend them, that's pathetic.
At least I make an argument for a side, and stick with it. Say what you want, but that's handicapping
What you do is a joke
What reasoning do you want? Stats and injury reprots that everyone knows? Trends that go back to the 1980s? Weather reports? Tom Brady being gay rumors?
Handicapping isnt making an argument for a side, because an argument can be made for either side, thats the whole point.
Bottomline, I pick winners. You TALK about how good you are, but dont back it up. Last 3 weeks I have won including 2 10-5 weeks, some juicy ML dogs and a 120-1 pleaser...all posted...
Why would I debate my picks? I have already played them and thats obviously the side I like. You coming in here saying picking the overs is dumb.....just like last week when you said betting all favs was dumb....until they almost swept the board....
Handicapping isnt having info, its knowing what to do with it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.