I think the spread difference has mainly to do with NO recent struggles. Last year when Ariz traveled to Car., the Panthers were coming in winning 8 of their last 10. This Saints team has had many close calls and come in losers of 3 straight. Also, oddsmakers know what this Ariz team is capable of, very dangerous, based on last year. Last year they were a surprise, hence, the high 10pt.
I think the spread difference has mainly to do with NO recent struggles. Last year when Ariz traveled to Car., the Panthers were coming in winning 8 of their last 10. This Saints team has had many close calls and come in losers of 3 straight. Also, oddsmakers know what this Ariz team is capable of, very dangerous, based on last year. Last year they were a surprise, hence, the high 10pt.
If you start to look back over last year and this year the teams that make it to the SB and loses play harder to get back and win. And the teams that almost make it seems to advance each year alittle farther.
The cards were dogs last year very close to winning the SB.
Ravens close to winning the AFC.. I know it a long shot but I can see that match-up in the SB and Cards winning .
I have been trying to find a book with SB exactas to be some
If you start to look back over last year and this year the teams that make it to the SB and loses play harder to get back and win. And the teams that almost make it seems to advance each year alittle farther.
The cards were dogs last year very close to winning the SB.
Ravens close to winning the AFC.. I know it a long shot but I can see that match-up in the SB and Cards winning .
I have been trying to find a book with SB exactas to be some
the high 10pt spread that is. They were actually dogged in every post season game including a slight 1.5 fav in their opening round game to Atl after I believe they opened as a dog. Simply, there was no respect given to this team last year.
the high 10pt spread that is. They were actually dogged in every post season game including a slight 1.5 fav in their opening round game to Atl after I believe they opened as a dog. Simply, there was no respect given to this team last year.
the high 10pt spread that is. They were actually dogged in every post season game including a slight 1.5 fav in their opening round game to Atl after I believe they opened as a dog. Simply, there was no respect given to this team last year.
Exactly.
You can't compare the spreads.
I wonder if Drew Brees will gift wrap the Cards 6 turnovers?
the high 10pt spread that is. They were actually dogged in every post season game including a slight 1.5 fav in their opening round game to Atl after I believe they opened as a dog. Simply, there was no respect given to this team last year.
Exactly.
You can't compare the spreads.
I wonder if Drew Brees will gift wrap the Cards 6 turnovers?
Why cant you compare them? Who the fuck are you? Its the EXACT same situation/scenario, one year later.
Are the Cards getting that much respect, or not enough???
Drew wont need to gift wrap 6, the 2 or 3 picks he will throw will be plenty
Train you cant compare the two because...Drew and Jake are two totally different QB's... Plus if the Packers can hang 45 on them at home..What do you think the Saints will do to them AT HOME IN THE DOME?
Why cant you compare them? Who the fuck are you? Its the EXACT same situation/scenario, one year later.
Are the Cards getting that much respect, or not enough???
Drew wont need to gift wrap 6, the 2 or 3 picks he will throw will be plenty
Train you cant compare the two because...Drew and Jake are two totally different QB's... Plus if the Packers can hang 45 on them at home..What do you think the Saints will do to them AT HOME IN THE DOME?
Train you cant compare the two because...Drew and Jake are two totally different QB's... Plus if the Packers can hang 45 on them at home..What do you think the Saints will do to them AT HOME IN THE DOME?
I CAN compare the 2 qbs because of that. Brees and Delhomme are different. Why is the line only 7 when last year it was 10? The Saints are better than the Panthers and Brees is better than Delhomme. The comparison is driving the line discrepency. Why only 7 for this game vs this team? The same situation last year is the only good comparison we have because the scenario and many factors are the same....Only variables are the Saints better offense but worse defense...
If TB can beat the Saints and hold them to 17, imagine what Warner and the Cardinals will do.....
You can compare apples to oranges, they have things in common even though they are 2 completely different things...
Train you cant compare the two because...Drew and Jake are two totally different QB's... Plus if the Packers can hang 45 on them at home..What do you think the Saints will do to them AT HOME IN THE DOME?
I CAN compare the 2 qbs because of that. Brees and Delhomme are different. Why is the line only 7 when last year it was 10? The Saints are better than the Panthers and Brees is better than Delhomme. The comparison is driving the line discrepency. Why only 7 for this game vs this team? The same situation last year is the only good comparison we have because the scenario and many factors are the same....Only variables are the Saints better offense but worse defense...
If TB can beat the Saints and hold them to 17, imagine what Warner and the Cardinals will do.....
You can compare apples to oranges, they have things in common even though they are 2 completely different things...
I CAN compare the 2 qbs because of that. Brees and Delhomme are different. Why is the line only 7 when last year it was 10? The Saints are better than the Panthers and Brees is better than Delhomme. The comparison is driving the line discrepency. Why only 7 for this game vs this team? The same situation last year is the only good comparison we have because the scenario and many factors are the same....Only variables are the Saints better offense but worse defense...
If TB can beat the Saints and hold them to 17, imagine what Warner and the Cardinals will do.....
You can compare apples to oranges, they have things in common even though they are 2 completely different things...
Dude, you are smarter than this. Are you really trying to compare this spread to last year's game? LAST YEARS GAME HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS GAME.
Think back to last year, the Cardinals looked absolutely horrible down the stretch and were getting TROUNCED by good teams. Sure, they won their 1st playoff game but they were at home against a bad D and rookie head coach/QB. Now they had to go play a really good team on the road (where they went 3-5) who was an OT loss away from being the #1 seed and had played very well down the stretch. The perception of the Cardinals at that time was that they still sucked (at 9-7 out of a horrific division) and would lose.
Flash forward to right now. The Cardinals run to a within a whisker of winning the Super Bowl is still fresh in everyone's mind. Their stars are front and center on every sports website. They played very good on the road this season and everybody just watched their offense put up 51 and absolutely destroy the #2 defense in the league. They aren't under the radar this time. While, everyone is also discussing how bad the Saints stumbled down the stretch.
It's perception dude!
There is no comparison whatsoever between this game and last year's Carolina game. If New Orleans had played well down the stretch and were playing the Cards of last year in this spot the line would probably be -11.5, but it's not, why? Because we've all seen what the Cardinals can do.
I CAN compare the 2 qbs because of that. Brees and Delhomme are different. Why is the line only 7 when last year it was 10? The Saints are better than the Panthers and Brees is better than Delhomme. The comparison is driving the line discrepency. Why only 7 for this game vs this team? The same situation last year is the only good comparison we have because the scenario and many factors are the same....Only variables are the Saints better offense but worse defense...
If TB can beat the Saints and hold them to 17, imagine what Warner and the Cardinals will do.....
You can compare apples to oranges, they have things in common even though they are 2 completely different things...
Dude, you are smarter than this. Are you really trying to compare this spread to last year's game? LAST YEARS GAME HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS GAME.
Think back to last year, the Cardinals looked absolutely horrible down the stretch and were getting TROUNCED by good teams. Sure, they won their 1st playoff game but they were at home against a bad D and rookie head coach/QB. Now they had to go play a really good team on the road (where they went 3-5) who was an OT loss away from being the #1 seed and had played very well down the stretch. The perception of the Cardinals at that time was that they still sucked (at 9-7 out of a horrific division) and would lose.
Flash forward to right now. The Cardinals run to a within a whisker of winning the Super Bowl is still fresh in everyone's mind. Their stars are front and center on every sports website. They played very good on the road this season and everybody just watched their offense put up 51 and absolutely destroy the #2 defense in the league. They aren't under the radar this time. While, everyone is also discussing how bad the Saints stumbled down the stretch.
It's perception dude!
There is no comparison whatsoever between this game and last year's Carolina game. If New Orleans had played well down the stretch and were playing the Cards of last year in this spot the line would probably be -11.5, but it's not, why? Because we've all seen what the Cardinals can do.
How can you possibly bet on the Saints -7. You cannot, and I repeat CANNOT expect to win against the spread laying 7 pts to a team that just scored 51 against one of the better rated defenses in football. Just take the Cardinals, because if you bet on the Saints -7 you will just feel like an @$$ after they lose. If you take AZ, at least you can say you made the right play, but you just lost. Gotta take the +7.
How can you possibly bet on the Saints -7. You cannot, and I repeat CANNOT expect to win against the spread laying 7 pts to a team that just scored 51 against one of the better rated defenses in football. Just take the Cardinals, because if you bet on the Saints -7 you will just feel like an @$$ after they lose. If you take AZ, at least you can say you made the right play, but you just lost. Gotta take the +7.
How can you possibly bet on the Saints -7. You cannot, and I repeat CANNOT expect to win against the spread laying 7 pts to a team that just scored 51 against one of the better rated defenses in football. Just take the Cardinals, because if you bet on the Saints -7 you will just feel like an @$$ after they lose. If you take AZ, at least you can say you made the right play, but you just lost. Gotta take the +7.
I'm leaning to the Cards, but this is a stupid post. Either team could win by double digits as you never know what can happen.
How can you possibly bet on the Saints -7. You cannot, and I repeat CANNOT expect to win against the spread laying 7 pts to a team that just scored 51 against one of the better rated defenses in football. Just take the Cardinals, because if you bet on the Saints -7 you will just feel like an @$$ after they lose. If you take AZ, at least you can say you made the right play, but you just lost. Gotta take the +7.
I'm leaning to the Cards, but this is a stupid post. Either team could win by double digits as you never know what can happen.
Dude, you are smarter than this. Are you really trying to compare this spread to last year's game? LAST YEARS GAME HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS GAME.
Think back to last year, the Cardinals looked absolutely horrible down the stretch and were getting TROUNCED by good teams. Sure, they won their 1st playoff game but they were at home against a bad D and rookie head coach/QB. Now they had to go play a really good team on the road (where they went 3-5) who was an OT loss away from being the #1 seed and had played very well down the stretch. The perception of the Cardinals at that time was that they still sucked (at 9-7 out of a horrific division) and would lose.
Flash forward to right now. The Cardinals run to a within a whisker of winning the Super Bowl is still fresh in everyone's mind. Their stars are front and center on every sports website. They played very good on the road this season and everybody just watched their offense put up 51 and absolutely destroy the #2 defense in the league. They aren't under the radar this time. While, everyone is also discussing how bad the Saints stumbled down the stretch.
It's perception dude!
There is no comparison whatsoever between this game and last year's Carolina game. If New Orleans had played well down the stretch and were playing the Cards of last year in this spot the line would probably be -11.5, but it's not, why? Because we've all seen what the Cardinals can do.
Dude, you are smarter than this. Are you really trying to compare this spread to last year's game? LAST YEARS GAME HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS GAME.
Think back to last year, the Cardinals looked absolutely horrible down the stretch and were getting TROUNCED by good teams. Sure, they won their 1st playoff game but they were at home against a bad D and rookie head coach/QB. Now they had to go play a really good team on the road (where they went 3-5) who was an OT loss away from being the #1 seed and had played very well down the stretch. The perception of the Cardinals at that time was that they still sucked (at 9-7 out of a horrific division) and would lose.
Flash forward to right now. The Cardinals run to a within a whisker of winning the Super Bowl is still fresh in everyone's mind. Their stars are front and center on every sports website. They played very good on the road this season and everybody just watched their offense put up 51 and absolutely destroy the #2 defense in the league. They aren't under the radar this time. While, everyone is also discussing how bad the Saints stumbled down the stretch.
It's perception dude!
There is no comparison whatsoever between this game and last year's Carolina game. If New Orleans had played well down the stretch and were playing the Cards of last year in this spot the line would probably be -11.5, but it's not, why? Because we've all seen what the Cardinals can do.
How can you possibly bet on the Saints -7. You cannot, and I repeat CANNOT expect to win against the spread laying 7 pts to a team that just scored 51 against one of the better rated defenses in football. Just take the Cardinals, because if you bet on the Saints -7 you will just feel like an @$$ after they lose. If you take AZ, at least you can say you made the right play, but you just lost. Gotta take the +7.
This is the NFL..anything can happen.
The Cards team that loss to the Niners might show up this week in New Orleans. You will really feel like an a$$ for taking them.
How can you possibly bet on the Saints -7. You cannot, and I repeat CANNOT expect to win against the spread laying 7 pts to a team that just scored 51 against one of the better rated defenses in football. Just take the Cardinals, because if you bet on the Saints -7 you will just feel like an @$$ after they lose. If you take AZ, at least you can say you made the right play, but you just lost. Gotta take the +7.
This is the NFL..anything can happen.
The Cards team that loss to the Niners might show up this week in New Orleans. You will really feel like an a$$ for taking them.
How can you possibly bet on the Saints -7. You cannot, and I repeat CANNOT expect to win against the spread laying 7 pts to a team that just scored 51 against one of the better rated defenses in football. Just take the Cardinals, because if you bet on the Saints -7 you will just feel like an @$$ after they lose. If you take AZ, at least you can say you made the right play, but you just lost. Gotta take the +7.
Cali : GB had the better D on paper because they played Detroit Clevland /Tbay/ Chicago /Seattle. 32nd rank schedule. Then they came up against a team with a winning record with an offense and gave up 40+. Any team in the league would have a great "D" facing those dregs
How can you possibly bet on the Saints -7. You cannot, and I repeat CANNOT expect to win against the spread laying 7 pts to a team that just scored 51 against one of the better rated defenses in football. Just take the Cardinals, because if you bet on the Saints -7 you will just feel like an @$$ after they lose. If you take AZ, at least you can say you made the right play, but you just lost. Gotta take the +7.
Cali : GB had the better D on paper because they played Detroit Clevland /Tbay/ Chicago /Seattle. 32nd rank schedule. Then they came up against a team with a winning record with an offense and gave up 40+. Any team in the league would have a great "D" facing those dregs
Dude, you are smarter than this. Are you really trying to compare this spread to last year's game? LAST YEARS GAME HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS GAME.
Think back to last year, the Cardinals looked absolutely horrible down the stretch and were getting TROUNCED by good teams. Sure, they won their 1st playoff game but they were at home against a bad D and rookie head coach/QB. Now they had to go play a really good team on the road (where they went 3-5) who was an OT loss away from being the #1 seed and had played very well down the stretch. The perception of the Cardinals at that time was that they still sucked (at 9-7 out of a horrific division) and would lose.
Flash forward to right now. The Cardinals run to a within a whisker of winning the Super Bowl is still fresh in everyone's mind. Their stars are front and center on every sports website. They played very good on the road this season and everybody just watched their offense put up 51 and absolutely destroy the #2 defense in the league. They aren't under the radar this time. While, everyone is also discussing how bad the Saints stumbled down the stretch.
It's perception dude!
There is no comparison whatsoever between this game and last year's Carolina game. If New Orleans had played well down the stretch and were playing the Cards of last year in this spot the line would probably be -11.5, but it's not, why? Because we've all seen what the Cardinals can do.
Dude, you are smarter than this. Are you really trying to compare this spread to last year's game? LAST YEARS GAME HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS GAME.
Think back to last year, the Cardinals looked absolutely horrible down the stretch and were getting TROUNCED by good teams. Sure, they won their 1st playoff game but they were at home against a bad D and rookie head coach/QB. Now they had to go play a really good team on the road (where they went 3-5) who was an OT loss away from being the #1 seed and had played very well down the stretch. The perception of the Cardinals at that time was that they still sucked (at 9-7 out of a horrific division) and would lose.
Flash forward to right now. The Cardinals run to a within a whisker of winning the Super Bowl is still fresh in everyone's mind. Their stars are front and center on every sports website. They played very good on the road this season and everybody just watched their offense put up 51 and absolutely destroy the #2 defense in the league. They aren't under the radar this time. While, everyone is also discussing how bad the Saints stumbled down the stretch.
It's perception dude!
There is no comparison whatsoever between this game and last year's Carolina game. If New Orleans had played well down the stretch and were playing the Cards of last year in this spot the line would probably be -11.5, but it's not, why? Because we've all seen what the Cardinals can do.
Saints should win by 2 TDs... even i didn't realize how good this Saints team was until i broke them down game-by-game...
they aren't the 85 Bears, but they are sure as hell in a different league than the Arizona Cardinals... will be extremely shocking if the Saints lose this game...
Saints should win by 2 TDs... even i didn't realize how good this Saints team was until i broke them down game-by-game...
they aren't the 85 Bears, but they are sure as hell in a different league than the Arizona Cardinals... will be extremely shocking if the Saints lose this game...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.