@Dilemma
Oh crap, I need help. Dude, I know my football, and that Packer's team is not designed to beat a team like TB. The Bucs have the best defensive line in football (arguable with Rams and Aaron Donald), but they're seriously going to shut down Aaron Jones. Now, don't get me wrong Rodgers is playing all world, but they're going to double, maybe triple team Adams, and let Rodgers throw to Lazard. Yeah the more write, the more like, maybe TB gets lucky and wins by a field goal, but the Pack should win this. LOL
@Dilemma
Oh crap, I need help. Dude, I know my football, and that Packer's team is not designed to beat a team like TB. The Bucs have the best defensive line in football (arguable with Rams and Aaron Donald), but they're seriously going to shut down Aaron Jones. Now, don't get me wrong Rodgers is playing all world, but they're going to double, maybe triple team Adams, and let Rodgers throw to Lazard. Yeah the more write, the more like, maybe TB gets lucky and wins by a field goal, but the Pack should win this. LOL
@ccqtyyc
dude you ended the conversation so good. Stick with the Packers will win this. Don't talk stats with Tampa and they can cover Adams with 3 people and Then he has lazard. How about Tonyan he is a monster Tight end with 11 td's how about Scantling the fastest man on the field. how about jones coming from the back field on a screen how about Tevon Austin the weapons Aaron rodgers has his one's he created. he has made every receiver and elite receiver because he is so accurate. Mr Brady is past his prime and he will not be throwing the ball all over the field because the packers Defense will be on his ASS. pressure brady and he makes mistakes. Rodgers can at least run and if he has time which he will he will pick apart this team and it will be over like a 4 leaf clover..
@ccqtyyc
dude you ended the conversation so good. Stick with the Packers will win this. Don't talk stats with Tampa and they can cover Adams with 3 people and Then he has lazard. How about Tonyan he is a monster Tight end with 11 td's how about Scantling the fastest man on the field. how about jones coming from the back field on a screen how about Tevon Austin the weapons Aaron rodgers has his one's he created. he has made every receiver and elite receiver because he is so accurate. Mr Brady is past his prime and he will not be throwing the ball all over the field because the packers Defense will be on his ASS. pressure brady and he makes mistakes. Rodgers can at least run and if he has time which he will he will pick apart this team and it will be over like a 4 leaf clover..
@ccqtyyc
The Bucs can be run on, Dalvin Cook was having his way with TB but the Vikes got too far behind and had to throw. He ended up with 102 yds most of that and carries, 22, in the first half. If not for Dan Bailey missing 3 FGs and an XP the Vikes could have possibly won that game.
@ccqtyyc
The Bucs can be run on, Dalvin Cook was having his way with TB but the Vikes got too far behind and had to throw. He ended up with 102 yds most of that and carries, 22, in the first half. If not for Dan Bailey missing 3 FGs and an XP the Vikes could have possibly won that game.
@bucsfanML
You think your a moron you started a thread saying they will beat the packers 45-20. They will close down Lambeau. Field if that ever happens. Dide go take a hit off your crack pipe the only team that has a chance of scoring 45 points is greeb bay..
@bucsfanML
You think your a moron you started a thread saying they will beat the packers 45-20. They will close down Lambeau. Field if that ever happens. Dide go take a hit off your crack pipe the only team that has a chance of scoring 45 points is greeb bay..
@bucsfanML
I think you and I should place a wager. Give me GB +24 1/2 you name the amount. If your ridiculous prediction of 45-20 is correct you can bank!
@bucsfanML
I think you and I should place a wager. Give me GB +24 1/2 you name the amount. If your ridiculous prediction of 45-20 is correct you can bank!
Whomever thinks Bucs will beat Packers this Sunday must be on some heavy drugs. Hands down packers will show up and beat the Bucs back to reality.
Packers 35- Bucs 17
Whomever thinks Bucs will beat Packers this Sunday must be on some heavy drugs. Hands down packers will show up and beat the Bucs back to reality.
Packers 35- Bucs 17
I now in fact think Buffalo has more than a chance .
An outright advantage almost.
I now in fact think Buffalo has more than a chance .
An outright advantage almost.
And yes. Tampa absolutely has more than a chance of beating Green Bay. The coach has beaten Green bay every time he's played them, 3. And their QB is yawning at his....how many conf championship games?
And yes. Tampa absolutely has more than a chance of beating Green Bay. The coach has beaten Green bay every time he's played them, 3. And their QB is yawning at his....how many conf championship games?
Agreed
Brady needed help from his defense to win at the SuperDome.. no way they win on even turnovers.. Rodgers turnover ratio at Lambeau is ridiculous and I expect the same this game
Fournette played down south all his career LSU Jacksonville and now Tampa.. they are expecting snow on Sunday so this is not good news for him.. gonna be like that prime time game with Titans when Henry did jack squat..
If it snows I expect Packers to blow them out
Agreed
Brady needed help from his defense to win at the SuperDome.. no way they win on even turnovers.. Rodgers turnover ratio at Lambeau is ridiculous and I expect the same this game
Fournette played down south all his career LSU Jacksonville and now Tampa.. they are expecting snow on Sunday so this is not good news for him.. gonna be like that prime time game with Titans when Henry did jack squat..
If it snows I expect Packers to blow them out
Im on the Packers, I saw the forecast and its basically some chance of snow showers that I don´t think will impact the game .
However, and just to help with the capping thought process, if any of you does believe that the forecast will have an impact in the game, in the sense that the teams will be more prone to running than usual, then this benefits Tampa Bay. Tampa has the best D in the league against the run. And FFS, Tom Brady has even more experience than Rodgers playing in the tundra.
GB backers are not taking this bet because of the weather. Our reasons are other...
Im on the Packers, I saw the forecast and its basically some chance of snow showers that I don´t think will impact the game .
However, and just to help with the capping thought process, if any of you does believe that the forecast will have an impact in the game, in the sense that the teams will be more prone to running than usual, then this benefits Tampa Bay. Tampa has the best D in the league against the run. And FFS, Tom Brady has even more experience than Rodgers playing in the tundra.
GB backers are not taking this bet because of the weather. Our reasons are other...
@zebrakiller
Lol. I have seen you arguing this in every thread out there, and had decided not to write anything, but I could not stand it any longer...
Anyone with a tv in their house with access to a sports network knew since the moment that Brady signed with the Bucs that the host of the Super Bowl has never reached the big game.
So no Zebra, you are not the annointed one for repeating the narrative and it has nothing to do with your "40 year experience". Also, that fact is irrelevant. Almost all historic facts are irrelevant since they are based on a much different context than the current one. Look at the last 5 hosting cities: Miami, Minnesota, Houston, Atlanta, Phoenix. None of those teams had a shot at getting to the Super Bowl (Minnesota came close but they made it way beyond their true expectations in that season).
Also, there is a reason why the dominant teams do not usually work as host cities. The weather. So if the Pats had hosted a SB your theory maybe would be gone. The same with Pitt. Strangely, Dallas has hosted only once - despite having good weather in January-.
So thanks for repeating for the millionth time this fact, it is useless :D
@zebrakiller
Lol. I have seen you arguing this in every thread out there, and had decided not to write anything, but I could not stand it any longer...
Anyone with a tv in their house with access to a sports network knew since the moment that Brady signed with the Bucs that the host of the Super Bowl has never reached the big game.
So no Zebra, you are not the annointed one for repeating the narrative and it has nothing to do with your "40 year experience". Also, that fact is irrelevant. Almost all historic facts are irrelevant since they are based on a much different context than the current one. Look at the last 5 hosting cities: Miami, Minnesota, Houston, Atlanta, Phoenix. None of those teams had a shot at getting to the Super Bowl (Minnesota came close but they made it way beyond their true expectations in that season).
Also, there is a reason why the dominant teams do not usually work as host cities. The weather. So if the Pats had hosted a SB your theory maybe would be gone. The same with Pitt. Strangely, Dallas has hosted only once - despite having good weather in January-.
So thanks for repeating for the millionth time this fact, it is useless :D
Hallelujah
Hallelujah
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.