I do love my spreadsheets.
1968 Jets -2 vs Raiders 27-23W
1971 Dolphins -1 vs Colts 21-0W
1982 Dolphins -1 vs Jets 14-0W
1987 Redskins -2.5 vs Vikings 17-10W
1987 Broncos -2.5 vs Browns 38-33W
2006 Bears -2.5 vs Saints 39-14W
2011 49ers -2 vs Giants 17-20L OT
2022 Chiefs -1.5 vs Bengals 23-20W
2022 Eagles -2.5 vs 49ers 31-7W
2024 Chiefs -1.5 vs Bills 32-29W
1968 Jets -2 vs Raiders 27-23W
1971 Dolphins -1 vs Colts 21-0W
1982 Dolphins -1 vs Jets 14-0W
1987 Redskins -2.5 vs Vikings 17-10W
1987 Broncos -2.5 vs Browns 38-33W
2006 Bears -2.5 vs Saints 39-14W
2011 49ers -2 vs Giants 17-20L OT
2022 Chiefs -1.5 vs Bengals 23-20W
2022 Eagles -2.5 vs 49ers 31-7W
2024 Chiefs -1.5 vs Bills 32-29W
Using Pro Reference, it has Skins -3 vs Vikings in 1987....also Broncos -3 vs Browns in 1987...also in 2006, I have Bears -3 vs Saints....I'm gonna go back to my own database when I get home to see where my losses are at & post my games on here if you don't mind.
But like I said before, depending on the database you are using, everyone can get different results because of the closing betting line can be different depending on the book you receive the line from.
Using Pro Reference, it has Skins -3 vs Vikings in 1987....also Broncos -3 vs Browns in 1987...also in 2006, I have Bears -3 vs Saints....I'm gonna go back to my own database when I get home to see where my losses are at & post my games on here if you don't mind.
But like I said before, depending on the database you are using, everyone can get different results because of the closing betting line can be different depending on the book you receive the line from.
Using Gimme the Dog's database which goes back to 1989:
PO = 1 and HF and line > -2.7 (Not exactly difficult or tricky Sports Data Query Language.)
SU: 11-16 (-3.1,40.7%)
ATS: 8-19 (-5.3,29.6%)
I certainly view LAR as a live underdog. Good luck everybody.
Using Gimme the Dog's database which goes back to 1989:
PO = 1 and HF and line > -2.7 (Not exactly difficult or tricky Sports Data Query Language.)
SU: 11-16 (-3.1,40.7%)
ATS: 8-19 (-5.3,29.6%)
I certainly view LAR as a live underdog. Good luck everybody.
Dog, hes talking about just the championship game. Are your results from just the CG?
Dog, hes talking about just the championship game. Are your results from just the CG?
No, but Gimme the DOG's SDQL does allow queries for game type, and the abbreviations are WC, DR, CH, SB.
PO = 1 and HF and line > -2.7 and game type = CH
SU: 2-1 (0.8,66.7%)
ATS: 2-1 (-0.7,66.7%) There is nothing convincing about a 3-game sample, especially with a negative average ATS margin.
Good luck.
No, but Gimme the DOG's SDQL does allow queries for game type, and the abbreviations are WC, DR, CH, SB.
PO = 1 and HF and line > -2.7 and game type = CH
SU: 2-1 (0.8,66.7%)
ATS: 2-1 (-0.7,66.7%) There is nothing convincing about a 3-game sample, especially with a negative average ATS margin.
Good luck.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.