Thought I was nuts and then thanked me afterwards. HERES YOUR WINNERS IF YOU CAN BE PATIENT...
The plays are on game #2 both days. Obviously you can do what you want and try to hit both, but the play is game #2...
Day 1 Saturday ( very confident on day1)
If kc covers +5, then play Arizona -7
If New England covers -5, then play Green Bay+7 ( and ml)
Day 2 Sunday ( not as confident as day 1 setup, but honestly I think it's right)
If Seattle+1.5 covers, then Denver -7 or whatever ( won't matter)
If Carolina-1.5, then Pitt + 7 or whatever and ml ( won't matter)
All ml's are bonus and don't count towards record keeping. ( I'm a degenerate what can I say)
I have a 4 team parlay with New England, Green Bay, Seattle and Denver from Monday but after much thinking and back and forth I am starting to think that maybe it could be
New England, Green Bay, Carolina. And Pitt so I'm Puting another parlay with the 4 of those for equal to my other one. ( something real shade about that Carolina game and I think they get it done. Pitt line just seems way too high to not grab the points.
The plays I like regardless of following what I mentioned above are New England-5 ( kc off a blowout and ne revenge...) Green Bay+7 (revenge and chip on their shoulder from last year) also I have a ton on Green Bay futures, Carolina -1.5 ( best team in the land almost a pick wtf?) and Pitt( only a hunch. Giving Big Ben 7.5 what? Did I read that right? I don't care if he plays by himself. he owns teams that give more then 3. Always has...
IN CONLCUSION:
I'll be following my day 1 and day 2 system, but I will have parlays and crazy sheeit going all over the place.
Thought I was nuts and then thanked me afterwards. HERES YOUR WINNERS IF YOU CAN BE PATIENT...
The plays are on game #2 both days. Obviously you can do what you want and try to hit both, but the play is game #2...
Day 1 Saturday ( very confident on day1)
If kc covers +5, then play Arizona -7
If New England covers -5, then play Green Bay+7 ( and ml)
Day 2 Sunday ( not as confident as day 1 setup, but honestly I think it's right)
If Seattle+1.5 covers, then Denver -7 or whatever ( won't matter)
If Carolina-1.5, then Pitt + 7 or whatever and ml ( won't matter)
All ml's are bonus and don't count towards record keeping. ( I'm a degenerate what can I say)
I have a 4 team parlay with New England, Green Bay, Seattle and Denver from Monday but after much thinking and back and forth I am starting to think that maybe it could be
New England, Green Bay, Carolina. And Pitt so I'm Puting another parlay with the 4 of those for equal to my other one. ( something real shade about that Carolina game and I think they get it done. Pitt line just seems way too high to not grab the points.
The plays I like regardless of following what I mentioned above are New England-5 ( kc off a blowout and ne revenge...) Green Bay+7 (revenge and chip on their shoulder from last year) also I have a ton on Green Bay futures, Carolina -1.5 ( best team in the land almost a pick wtf?) and Pitt( only a hunch. Giving Big Ben 7.5 what? Did I read that right? I don't care if he plays by himself. he owns teams that give more then 3. Always has...
IN CONLCUSION:
I'll be following my day 1 and day 2 system, but I will have parlays and crazy sheeit going all over the place.
This is very coincidental, but I came up with same results for all your possible plays this weekend. I flipped a coin, 5 out of 7 and the results are the same. ROFLMAO
This is very coincidental, but I came up with same results for all your possible plays this weekend. I flipped a coin, 5 out of 7 and the results are the same. ROFLMAO
Got ML parlay on NE, DEN, SEA, GB this week to advance. Its only proper, the 4 best world champion QBs play in the championship round for the right to go to the Super Bowl
And the DEN/GB Superbowl prop we discussed on another thread
Got ML parlay on NE, DEN, SEA, GB this week to advance. Its only proper, the 4 best world champion QBs play in the championship round for the right to go to the Super Bowl
And the DEN/GB Superbowl prop we discussed on another thread
B, you are solid so I'm sure there is a method to your madness, but can you explain it?what is the reasoning to being so sure that this is the way it will play out?not trying to bash at all bud, but curious whybol as always
I think this's his method : If DOG covered 1st game ...then bet on Fav on 2nd game . vice versa
Bingo ! That seems like the system, although I like to get my plays settled when lines are the best , Denver -6.5, Seattle +3, GB +7.5, NE -5. NE is only line i could have been more patient on and maybe grabbed it at 4. Best of luck to all.
B, you are solid so I'm sure there is a method to your madness, but can you explain it?what is the reasoning to being so sure that this is the way it will play out?not trying to bash at all bud, but curious whybol as always
I think this's his method : If DOG covered 1st game ...then bet on Fav on 2nd game . vice versa
Bingo ! That seems like the system, although I like to get my plays settled when lines are the best , Denver -6.5, Seattle +3, GB +7.5, NE -5. NE is only line i could have been more patient on and maybe grabbed it at 4. Best of luck to all.
I think this's his method : If DOG covered 1st game ...then bet on Fav on 2nd game . vice versa
no,thats his madness...the method is how he comes about reaching the conclusion that it will play out so.
bpickin,good luck....and is there a result you wud prefer in the earlier game or does it not matter??...like wud you want the favourite to take the first so you can bet the dog later??or vice versa.....just wondering if either is stronger in your eyes.
I think this's his method : If DOG covered 1st game ...then bet on Fav on 2nd game . vice versa
no,thats his madness...the method is how he comes about reaching the conclusion that it will play out so.
bpickin,good luck....and is there a result you wud prefer in the earlier game or does it not matter??...like wud you want the favourite to take the first so you can bet the dog later??or vice versa.....just wondering if either is stronger in your eyes.
no,thats his madness...the method is how he comes about reaching the conclusion that it will play out so.
bpickin,good luck....and is there a result you wud prefer in the earlier game or does it not matter??...like wud you want the favourite to take the first so you can bet the dog later??or vice versa.....just wondering if either is stronger in your eyes.
.
Doesn't matter, but yes I would prefer the favorite first so I Can slam the dog and ml bonus... ( if second game plays out to be a dog)
It's not always a dog/fave things last year was 2 dogs on (Sunday day2) so was last week. I didn't follow this last week because I had all ready liked my plays... TYPICALLY DAY 1 IS MORE SOLID/SAFER EASIER TO PLAY BECAUSE IT DOES SEEM TO HAVE 1 DOG AND 1 FAVE LATELY...
no,thats his madness...the method is how he comes about reaching the conclusion that it will play out so.
bpickin,good luck....and is there a result you wud prefer in the earlier game or does it not matter??...like wud you want the favourite to take the first so you can bet the dog later??or vice versa.....just wondering if either is stronger in your eyes.
.
Doesn't matter, but yes I would prefer the favorite first so I Can slam the dog and ml bonus... ( if second game plays out to be a dog)
It's not always a dog/fave things last year was 2 dogs on (Sunday day2) so was last week. I didn't follow this last week because I had all ready liked my plays... TYPICALLY DAY 1 IS MORE SOLID/SAFER EASIER TO PLAY BECAUSE IT DOES SEEM TO HAVE 1 DOG AND 1 FAVE LATELY...
I'm definitely playing sat night game. Sunday night game is a maybe because it's a little tricky this week. I do have parlays going which I could be happy with...
I'm definitely playing sat night game. Sunday night game is a maybe because it's a little tricky this week. I do have parlays going which I could be happy with...
I just put another parlay New England Green Bay Seattle and Pitt
If New England Green Bay and Seattle all hit I will probably make a play on Pitt straight also. This goes against what I said above which is why I said day 2 is tricky.
*****DAY 2 IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DAY2 IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE******
I just put another parlay New England Green Bay Seattle and Pitt
If New England Green Bay and Seattle all hit I will probably make a play on Pitt straight also. This goes against what I said above which is why I said day 2 is tricky.
*****DAY 2 IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DAY2 IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE******
On Sunday it could end up 2 dogs or 2 faves... What happens on Saturday and Sunday morning WILL determine that for me. If the first 3 games go a certain way then I WILL have the winner for the last game... And some could be surprised... Last year everyone was surprised.... Again only if games 1,2,3 fall a certain way...
On Sunday it could end up 2 dogs or 2 faves... What happens on Saturday and Sunday morning WILL determine that for me. If the first 3 games go a certain way then I WILL have the winner for the last game... And some could be surprised... Last year everyone was surprised.... Again only if games 1,2,3 fall a certain way...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.