ESPN Sunday Countdown consensus?

All four on Packers,and all four on Pats. In the past, I have noticed fading this consensus can b good . Hence,Broncos and Bills of interest today ? Certainly they wouldn't have an agenda in doing such ?  Is this reflecting widespread mkt sentiment? ESPN was talking quite negatively of the Bills this week...in numerous regards. Possible buy here ?  Will be interesting.

What's up ?

Really nice W. 1-0 today. All ESPN did was trash them all week. No O,except Allen. No WR talent. Not a good team.  Gonna fire the coach ? And on and on.  Great comeback.

Come on Bo. 

Yet Vegas had em favored,on the road,agst the hottest team in the NFL.  Hello. Books had to clean up w all heavy Pat monies.  Did ESPN contribute to this w their rhetoric? Definitely wouldn't put it past them. Been losing respect. Colin Cowherd having Brady on Th and doesn't even bring up situation at Michigan. Wtf

Sweet 2-0.  So these damn football experts,three ex NFL,two HOFers, former coach,Greeny,constantly get these games wrong. Makes you wonder. We,as bettors,just gotta find our own approach and ignore so much of this bs that is put out in the media. Often,for nefarious reasons. Where large bucks are involved...

Don't ever listen to those clowns. You might as well go into the darkness and throw darts.

Excuse me,it was all five of em. All one sided.

Clowns for sure..

Sucking the retail sheep in.  Also,Grab some of dat UGA +550 to win the Natty. Very nice ROI with limited downside. Nice value imo. UGA grad myself.  Defense made huge strides. Team peaking at good time. I done the research. No certainty...just probabilities. 

See where ESPN bet has been shut down. DK now official book,partner with ESPN. Frankly, this is even more questionable. Imo

That program been averaging between 1.2- 1.5 million viewers this season. Certainly,none of those would place wagers w DK after hearing the " experts" pix would they. So many darn, unscrupulous agendas these days to separate folks from their hard earned cash.  Yes,always present, but seems to be more insidious in today's society. 

@fts1409

 No, they're just dudes talking about football. Even though they are mostly ex players they can be very square. 

That is all

@undermysac

 I hear ya, but certainly  some of them gotta have some semblance of sophistication,insight as such.. it appears they r mostly in widespread agreement the times I watch. Same with the college game day guys.  I rarely see much deviation. In the group. Of recent interest Saban,McElroy and a few others there were all over Bama . Before that azz whooping. 

Watching sports center early this am,gonna skip Get Up. To think not a single  one of the five yesterday picked a team,that had won nine in a row,playing at home as a dog, in one of the most difficult venues for a visiting team, to win,cover the game,frankly,is beyond credible.  With one of the best Ds in the league. If bettors don't question this,they really shouldn't be speculating in this difficult endeavor.  Seriously.  Do your own due diligence. Find your own edge that suits you.  Don't follow people blindly. Have a great week.

@fts1409

 Good catch 

But in the opening post you said not one of them picked the Bills. The Pats were on a 10 game win streak at home as a dog. Same criteria as the Broncos pretty much. They were wrong on both games.

Interpret that as you may. What were the betting splits on both of these games?

@fts1409

 I’ve said it for years on Covers. They are Idiots.

Yesterday on FOX, Gronk said the following about a game…

”If they can control the running game and not turn the ball over, they should win”

No sh&t Sherlock. Every pre game show is the same. And the “betting shows”? The on air talent never had to sweat at 6:45 EST Sunday night hoping to hit the second leg of their parlay.