Anyone else get screwed on Colts +4. Unbelievable, they were covering the entire game. Why would jaguars kick a 53 yd field goal there with 15 seconds to go and colts no time outs. You miss and colts get ball at midfield down by 3. This is completely BS fck!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Anyone else get screwed on Colts +4. Unbelievable, they were covering the entire game. Why would jaguars kick a 53 yd field goal there with 15 seconds to go and colts no time outs. You miss and colts get ball at midfield down by 3. This is completely BS fck!
Yeah. Could’ve punted them inside their own 10 yard line with under 10 seconds left and no timed outs, but risked giving them the ball around the 50 yard line.
coach wanted that cover
1
Yeah. Could’ve punted them inside their own 10 yard line with under 10 seconds left and no timed outs, but risked giving them the ball around the 50 yard line.
The real question is why would they run a sweep towards the sideline? Running north/south would’ve been the logical thing. They were aware of the line and score
0
The real question is why would they run a sweep towards the sideline? Running north/south would’ve been the logical thing. They were aware of the line and score
Quote Originally Posted by AJ86: @sgvguy Your having a rough go lately. Hang in there... Thanks man, these constant bad beats towards the end are killing me
Been there. It blows. But it will turn around.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sgvguy:
Quote Originally Posted by AJ86: @sgvguy Your having a rough go lately. Hang in there... Thanks man, these constant bad beats towards the end are killing me
Yeah. Could’ve punted them inside their own 10 yard line with under 10 seconds left and no timed outs, but risked giving them the ball around the 50 yard line. coach wanted that cover
That's exactly my point. Then the colts would have 1 play, 2 plays at most inside their 10 yard line. Didn't make sense to risk giving the colts the ball at midfield up by only 3 unless the coach really wanted the cover
0
Quote Originally Posted by ThirtyThree:
Yeah. Could’ve punted them inside their own 10 yard line with under 10 seconds left and no timed outs, but risked giving them the ball around the 50 yard line. coach wanted that cover
That's exactly my point. Then the colts would have 1 play, 2 plays at most inside their 10 yard line. Didn't make sense to risk giving the colts the ball at midfield up by only 3 unless the coach really wanted the cover
Quote Originally Posted by sgvguy: Quote Originally Posted by AJ86: @sgvguy Your having a rough go lately. Hang in there... Thanks man, these constant bad beats towards the end are killing me Been there. It blows. But it will turn around.
That's why I continue to grind it out thinking it can't get any worse
0
Quote Originally Posted by AJ86:
Quote Originally Posted by sgvguy: Quote Originally Posted by AJ86: @sgvguy Your having a rough go lately. Hang in there... Thanks man, these constant bad beats towards the end are killing me Been there. It blows. But it will turn around.
That's why I continue to grind it out thinking it can't get any worse
Reality is the Colts didn’t need to go for it on 4th and 11 with timeouts and the 2 min warning with over 3 mins left in the game. They pressed and it was an idiotic approach. Regardless, if they have nothing to play for. That wasn’t trying to win
0
Reality is the Colts didn’t need to go for it on 4th and 11 with timeouts and the 2 min warning with over 3 mins left in the game. They pressed and it was an idiotic approach. Regardless, if they have nothing to play for. That wasn’t trying to win
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
