You'd have to be a coward or a sheep to be betting the Broncos here. This is reminiscent of SF at Seattle a couple weeks back. Bettors got scared off Seattle and were foolish enough to bet SF +7.
This situation is very similar w/ the line moving down to +3.5. Are you gonna be the sucker again and take the Broncos? The Broncos aren't quite a paper tiger, but they are outclassed in about every aspect and are starting a backup qb for godsakes.
Classic case where the line is manipulating public perception.
Patriots gonna cruise here. Don't be the sucker.
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
You'd have to be a coward or a sheep to be betting the Broncos here. This is reminiscent of SF at Seattle a couple weeks back. Bettors got scared off Seattle and were foolish enough to bet SF +7.
This situation is very similar w/ the line moving down to +3.5. Are you gonna be the sucker again and take the Broncos? The Broncos aren't quite a paper tiger, but they are outclassed in about every aspect and are starting a backup qb for godsakes.
Classic case where the line is manipulating public perception.
Out classed? Nope. Difference between this and San Francisco is the best pass rush in the NFL going up against a poor Patriot O Line..I'm not even taking points...Denver wins straight up.
1
Out classed? Nope. Difference between this and San Francisco is the best pass rush in the NFL going up against a poor Patriot O Line..I'm not even taking points...Denver wins straight up.
[Quote: Originally Posted by slikstiks99]You'd have to be a coward or a sheep to be betting the Broncos here. This is reminiscent of SF at Seattle a couple weeks back. Bettors got scared off Seattle and were foolish enough to bet SF +7. This situation is very similar w/ the line moving down to +3.5. Are you gonna be the sucker again and take the Broncos? The Broncos aren't quite a paper tiger, but they are outclassed in about every aspect and are starting a backup qb for godsakes. Classic case where the line is manipulating public perception. Patriots gonna cruise here. Don't be the sucker.[/Quote]
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by slikstiks99]You'd have to be a coward or a sheep to be betting the Broncos here. This is reminiscent of SF at Seattle a couple weeks back. Bettors got scared off Seattle and were foolish enough to bet SF +7. This situation is very similar w/ the line moving down to +3.5. Are you gonna be the sucker again and take the Broncos? The Broncos aren't quite a paper tiger, but they are outclassed in about every aspect and are starting a backup qb for godsakes. Classic case where the line is manipulating public perception. Patriots gonna cruise here. Don't be the sucker.[/Quote]
right and the Patriots got a gift turnover at the 10 in what was a questionable backward pass call...take that away and the patriots don't have a touchdown
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
right and the Patriots got a gift turnover at the 10 in what was a questionable backward pass call...take that away and the patriots don't have a touchdown
But the weather basically ended that game after the 1st half. Pats cruise in the 2nd in the absence of a blizzard lol.
Also, Broncos +3.5 backers need to thank Vrabel for trying that ridiculous gadget play in the redzone that kept the TD off the board. A fake snap to the RB after they were dominating the line of scrimmage. I'd be furious if that affected me. Or I'd be extremely gracious as a +3.5 backer.
Anyhow, in the next game...
Charbonnet is a major loss. I'd back Seattle strongly if he was not injured. I am still on Seattle -2.5 but very small.
0
I made out just fine w/ NE ml and -2.5.
But the weather basically ended that game after the 1st half. Pats cruise in the 2nd in the absence of a blizzard lol.
Also, Broncos +3.5 backers need to thank Vrabel for trying that ridiculous gadget play in the redzone that kept the TD off the board. A fake snap to the RB after they were dominating the line of scrimmage. I'd be furious if that affected me. Or I'd be extremely gracious as a +3.5 backer.
Anyhow, in the next game...
Charbonnet is a major loss. I'd back Seattle strongly if he was not injured. I am still on Seattle -2.5 but very small.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.