2023

@DogbiteWilliams

 I would also take a look at t:rank, o:division and maybe even t:conference.   Because of history these are relevant to me in week 1. Week 1 is usually the strong survive.  Some of these week 1 dogs can’t compete against elite.   Good luck on this, but I won’t be using this one.  

@spottie2935

I was unaware of the "t:rank" parameter.  Thanks.

tpS(W)>=9 and week = 1 and F and line > -37.2 and n:line > -2.7

ATS:  35-70-3 (-4.4,33.3%)  Apparently the webmaster (or assistants) has entered more data.

tpS(W)>=9 and week = 1 and F and line > -37.2 and n:line > -2.7 and t:rank < 25.5

ATS:  14-16-1 (-0.1,46.7%)

You were correct.  Those Top 25 powerhouses don't fail as often as unranked teams.

Is there a parameter for unranked teams? "t:rank > 25.5" does not work.

if you input just t:rank and F you will see 26 results 1-25 and the last is t:rank=None

I use just t:rank to see the differences 

I also use p:rank or pp:rank and continue further ppp:rank and so on.  using these you can find regression against favorites or "value" on dogs 

week=1 and HF and tpS(playoffs)!=1 and tpS(playoffs)!=3 and tpS(W)>7 and season>2013 and line<-4

also keep in mind (all season long) o:division and o:rank

I added n:D to this query and the result was (0-11) ATS with -9.6 pts along with -9.5<line<-4

thanks spottie, looks to be golden.

@jowchoo

 As you can see i dont need teasers too boost my records and these queries are just time wasters for me.  I wont disclose my best here.  

best wishes 

You really are a strange one.................................gl

@jowchoo

 I was and still am thinking the same about yourself.  We communicated before and your approach was not to my liking.  After I said my piece I stayed out of your way.  Guess what, here you are, yea its me being strange in my thread. 

 Your communication is all my fault right?  Now if you dont like my thread best you change.   

Sorry for posting a thankyou for your query.To berate me for that is beyond explanation.Some sort of complex I guess. Good Luck going forward, I hope this communication has not caused you stress and I will continue to pad my record and my ROI with teasers.....lol

@jowchoo

 You’re not padding your record you betting and winning. Albeit 2 or more teams with crappy odds but winning is winning I guess.  Look I  already told you that your communication was wild last year.

 You never once posted where I was posting last year and gave me an off the hip comment with no thought if what you were saying.  if you think that, I’m at all excited to go back and forth?  That’s wild.  I saw the way you shoot from the hip with reckless abandon and I’m nipping this is the bud.  I want to disturb your peace in my thread so you refrain from the desire to enter.  

That’s it nothing further.  You don’t think about your comments and shoot from the hip.  I have given you all the info you need so post here if you like but I won’t respect you and I will disturb.  Why? Because I know more BS from you is in the way.  People show you who they are and I respect that.  

have a great year I want you to win.  If you grant me a wish, please exit.  

I don’t need to post and I probable will cut back for a while.  

peace out. 

not a keeper

week = 2 and HF and ats streak=-1 and 12>PRSW>3 and o:division=FCS and rank=None and season>2016 and total>=57 and line>-36

week=2 and p:HD and p:margi>-6 and line>3 and tpS(W)<6 and p:line<7 and p:points>13 and op:points<29 and opS(W)>5

(3-1) for the last 15 years.....USELESS

@jowchoo

 This is who you are and what I saw in your brain.  Keep proving me right.  Confirmation makes me feel right about you.  

Use our conversation to make you a better person instead of being arrogant 

week<8 and F and PRSW>12 and tpS(playoffs)>0 and ats streak!=-1 and o:streak>-2 and -3>=line>-10 and total>53

week<8 and F and PRSW>12 and tpS(playoffs)>0 and ats streak!=-1 and o:streak>-2 and -3>=line>-10 and total<=45

no plays last year, 4-4 (ATS) the year before. A real winner....lol

Like this:

season=2024 and op:RFD<5 and total<44.5 and op:U and p:O and week<18..............16-1 to the UNDER last year.

or maybe a nice ATS query.

season=2024 and PRSW=6 and week>5 and p:L...................(3-17), there is some meat on that bone...lol

week<12 and FC and season>2008 and rank<19 and p:rank > 8 and 2 > ats streak > -2 and 11 > PRSW > 2 and streak > 3 and t:losses = 0 and line<=-4

tpS(W)>3 and o:rank<26 and 10>opS(W)>4 and D and week>5 and week<12 and ats streak<3 and ats streak!=-1 and 63>op:points>3 and o:ats streak<6 and n:A and 3>o:losses>0 and p:rank=None and p:points<48 and o:rest<7 and season>2006 and p:points>2 and line<=20 and tpppS(W)<11 and ono:rank!=1 and t:losses<6

@jowchoo

 One season query’s are a fluke.  Completely unstable.  How the heck can you trust this betting 1k or more?  

I have 3 more, all like this.  Proven  over several seasons and rarely a loss.  That’s all I need. Keep digging.  Maybe one day you won’t have to bet teasers to be successful. 

@spottie2935

 Lets see whose ROI this upcoming season is higher, a hint, it will not be yours.

@spottie2935

 OK genius, money won on teasers bets is less valuable than otherwise. You are unable to fathom VALUE. Go brush up on Stanley Wong and his teaser data. You did know the books had their asses handed to themselves by informed players like me, they even had to up the juice they charged,but that fact is over your head.