@packersbackers
SHUT UP!
@Justasquirrel
Yes, you're right, 1000% ... take Knicks/Celtics today, 219.5 - prime time game, rival of the east, tons of people proably had bet the over ... the game started with a blast, lots of 3 pointers, fast scoring, total goes up to 225.5
And then - it went down, I took the under, I read the "script" of this game, and I won, but I agree - this is not a normal way of a game being played, it's not natural, it's artificial, it's affected by the odds and by the "script" 1000%.
Check my post here:
https://www.covers.com/forum/nba-betting-22/over--under-tonight-103785716
I wrote #4 post to take the over before the game started, why?!
Because the Cavs last year was an under team, time after time after time .... now it's the opposite... just like KC Chiefs, last year an over team, 60-80 pts in total, now whoever took unders with KC Chiefs made tons of $$$.
What, Patrick Mahomes has changed in such a short time? No.
You are right, 10000%
And the people here keep on betting on sides, and spreads, why they don't post totals is beyond me, totals is so much a better bet than spreads.
I am not trying to understand the fallacy of the people, I just try to read the "script" which you're referring to, but you are right 10000%, this is not a coincidence, no way whatsoever.