I love this play based how INDY has been playing in the 1H this year against division foes, CHI and especially the last five games. If INDY makes this a game at all I think it will occur in the 1H because CHI closes games out (typically) real well. What do you all think?
I love this play based how INDY has been playing in the 1H this year against division foes, CHI and especially the last five games. If INDY makes this a game at all I think it will occur in the 1H because CHI closes games out (typically) real well. What do you all think?
I dunno, if Indy shows up at all, the game goes over. Indy can't defend, so it's either Chicago and under, (because Indy just gets no points), or Indy and over, (chicago still wins but doesn't cover because Indy actually gets some buckets).
Either way, I think you're right that IF Indy does show up, it will have to be early on. So 1st half is not a terrible play on Indy. No way the Bulls lose here. But definitely Indy can make it a game.
I dunno, if Indy shows up at all, the game goes over. Indy can't defend, so it's either Chicago and under, (because Indy just gets no points), or Indy and over, (chicago still wins but doesn't cover because Indy actually gets some buckets).
Either way, I think you're right that IF Indy does show up, it will have to be early on. So 1st half is not a terrible play on Indy. No way the Bulls lose here. But definitely Indy can make it a game.
You are certainly in opposition to the majority....I like it!
I think this one goes over 95 1H precisely because I think the Pacers put 47-48 points and Da Bulls post a 50 spot. Prevailing opinion is a slow-down grind but I don't think we see this until at least Game 2.
You are certainly in opposition to the majority....I like it!
I think this one goes over 95 1H precisely because I think the Pacers put 47-48 points and Da Bulls post a 50 spot. Prevailing opinion is a slow-down grind but I don't think we see this until at least Game 2.
I hear all the concerns about CHI but if INDY doesn't have any motivation in GAME ONE then when will they? People keep saying that CHI is going to make a statement in game one... really? What is their motivation to do this. Sure if they can win by 30 they will but if an NBA team cannot get up for this first game then fade them thereafter. I just think that CHI will prove to be too tough down the stretch of the game but not certain that is the case in the 1st part of the game. BOL to all and thanks for your comments!
I hear all the concerns about CHI but if INDY doesn't have any motivation in GAME ONE then when will they? People keep saying that CHI is going to make a statement in game one... really? What is their motivation to do this. Sure if they can win by 30 they will but if an NBA team cannot get up for this first game then fade them thereafter. I just think that CHI will prove to be too tough down the stretch of the game but not certain that is the case in the 1st part of the game. BOL to all and thanks for your comments!
I hear all the concerns about CHI but if INDY doesn't have any motivation in GAME ONE then when will they? People keep saying that CHI is going to make a statement in game one... really? What is their motivation to do this. Sure if they can win by 30 they will but if an NBA team cannot get up for this first game then fade them thereafter. I just think that CHI will prove to be too tough down the stretch of the game but not certain that is the case in the 1st part of the game. BOL to all and thanks for your comments!
I hear all the concerns about CHI but if INDY doesn't have any motivation in GAME ONE then when will they? People keep saying that CHI is going to make a statement in game one... really? What is their motivation to do this. Sure if they can win by 30 they will but if an NBA team cannot get up for this first game then fade them thereafter. I just think that CHI will prove to be too tough down the stretch of the game but not certain that is the case in the 1st part of the game. BOL to all and thanks for your comments!
I think Bulls closes this 2Q on a run so big 2H spread on the Bulls.
Doesn't look like it. CHI defense is very lacking right now. 1H just went over. I am hoping for a CHI to win straight up kinda 2H play or I don't know I will put any money on the Bulls at this point.
I think Bulls closes this 2Q on a run so big 2H spread on the Bulls.
Doesn't look like it. CHI defense is very lacking right now. 1H just went over. I am hoping for a CHI to win straight up kinda 2H play or I don't know I will put any money on the Bulls at this point.
Pacers might hang in this right to the wire - Granger has looked like a dipshit and there still right there...Dumb tech by that young coach though.
Bulls are going be in for a lot of close games in these playoffs if there entire offense is going be Rose like it has been thus far in this one...Might be a good fade with these fat lines
Pacers might hang in this right to the wire - Granger has looked like a dipshit and there still right there...Dumb tech by that young coach though.
Bulls are going be in for a lot of close games in these playoffs if there entire offense is going be Rose like it has been thus far in this one...Might be a good fade with these fat lines
Passing on CHI -9.5 2H. I might have considered it if INDY had a 7 point lead (like they probably should) but not with a 4 point lead. I lean CHI but cannot pull the trigger after what I saw. BOL!
Passing on CHI -9.5 2H. I might have considered it if INDY had a 7 point lead (like they probably should) but not with a 4 point lead. I lean CHI but cannot pull the trigger after what I saw. BOL!
Pacers might hang in this right to the wire - Granger has looked like a dipshit and there still right there...Dumb tech by that young coach though.
Bulls are going be in for a lot of close games in these playoffs if there entire offense is going be Rose like it has been thus far in this one...Might be a good fade with these fat lines
I think you are right dad. I think you hit the nail on the head about Rose being the only one stepping up so far. Plus they need a stronger defensive presence. I could easily see a 1-5 point CHI win so no thanks on CHI 2H. BOL!
Pacers might hang in this right to the wire - Granger has looked like a dipshit and there still right there...Dumb tech by that young coach though.
Bulls are going be in for a lot of close games in these playoffs if there entire offense is going be Rose like it has been thus far in this one...Might be a good fade with these fat lines
I think you are right dad. I think you hit the nail on the head about Rose being the only one stepping up so far. Plus they need a stronger defensive presence. I could easily see a 1-5 point CHI win so no thanks on CHI 2H. BOL!
Doesn't look like it. CHI defense is very lacking right now. 1H just went over. I am hoping for a CHI to win straight up kinda 2H play or I don't know I will put any money on the Bulls at this point.
If the Bulls lose Game 1. You think they don't comeback?
By the Pacers winning (if they do) it only establishes that this series will go at least 6 games
Doesn't look like it. CHI defense is very lacking right now. 1H just went over. I am hoping for a CHI to win straight up kinda 2H play or I don't know I will put any money on the Bulls at this point.
If the Bulls lose Game 1. You think they don't comeback?
By the Pacers winning (if they do) it only establishes that this series will go at least 6 games
If the Bulls lose Game 1. You think they don't comeback?
By the Pacers winning (if they do) it only establishes that this series will go at least 6 games
No I absolutely agree with you. I was referring to the poster that I quoted in that he said CHI would finish strong the 1H. With a little help they made it a 2 possession game.
If the Bulls lose Game 1. You think they don't comeback?
By the Pacers winning (if they do) it only establishes that this series will go at least 6 games
No I absolutely agree with you. I was referring to the poster that I quoted in that he said CHI would finish strong the 1H. With a little help they made it a 2 possession game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.