Notes: -Got a great number on the Rockies and Francis did what I asked to keep it close before his exit. A 1-1 game through six turned into 4 runs in three innings against the Mets pen and a relatively sweat free win (even when Betancourt was a little wild) -Capuano was terrible and the Giants smacked the ball around a lot today. Hunter Pence is currently an automatic out and he also botched a flyball that pushed the game over. Chris Guccione also choked on a third strike that cost me a run (would have needed a bunch of help to win)
Notes: -Got a great number on the Rockies and Francis did what I asked to keep it close before his exit. A 1-1 game through six turned into 4 runs in three innings against the Mets pen and a relatively sweat free win (even when Betancourt was a little wild) -Capuano was terrible and the Giants smacked the ball around a lot today. Hunter Pence is currently an automatic out and he also botched a flyball that pushed the game over. Chris Guccione also choked on a third strike that cost me a run (would have needed a bunch of help to win)
Some Tigers thoughts: -They are priced like they average 5.5 runs per game when they only average 4.5, but I just hate the way they play
baseball. They should win a lot more games than they do, I also watched
how Verlander should have gotten an L last time out against Baltimore
and somehow slithered off the hook and his team won, too.
The Jays offense is likely going to keep me away, or force me into a RL
play, but I think Happ can hold his own out there when he's on and I'm
just praying Toronto saw some film from Zoolander's last outing and
Farrell tells them if they want to play on Friday they better take some
f-ing pitches.
Obviously tomorrow could be the stinker where Happ gets shelled, but based
on the way the Tigers play ball it's going to take HRs with ducks on
the pond or some clutch hitting (which they haven't shown me at all) to
win by a big
margin.
Some Tigers thoughts: -They are priced like they average 5.5 runs per game when they only average 4.5, but I just hate the way they play
baseball. They should win a lot more games than they do, I also watched
how Verlander should have gotten an L last time out against Baltimore
and somehow slithered off the hook and his team won, too.
The Jays offense is likely going to keep me away, or force me into a RL
play, but I think Happ can hold his own out there when he's on and I'm
just praying Toronto saw some film from Zoolander's last outing and
Farrell tells them if they want to play on Friday they better take some
f-ing pitches.
Obviously tomorrow could be the stinker where Happ gets shelled, but based
on the way the Tigers play ball it's going to take HRs with ducks on
the pond or some clutch hitting (which they haven't shown me at all) to
win by a big
margin.
I'm with you on Toronto....I got +272. I agree with much of what you said. Good luck
Still debating on what to do here. I think the RL obviously has a much better chance of hitting, but I do like the low risk-high reward part of a play in the 260s. Gonna make sure Encarnacion is in the lineup and maybe we'll catch a break and see Prince sit against the southpaw. I think if that happens I'll grab the ML, but if not I'll stick with a +140-ish RL. Maybe I'll get really frisky and try both
I'm with you on Toronto....I got +272. I agree with much of what you said. Good luck
Still debating on what to do here. I think the RL obviously has a much better chance of hitting, but I do like the low risk-high reward part of a play in the 260s. Gonna make sure Encarnacion is in the lineup and maybe we'll catch a break and see Prince sit against the southpaw. I think if that happens I'll grab the ML, but if not I'll stick with a +140-ish RL. Maybe I'll get really frisky and try both
last time I had the Twins in Arlington they were a 70-cent dog and Perkins blew a 3-1 lead in the 9th. Hopefully different this time...
add Minnesota ML (+157) @ Texas -Locking it in now, will try to write it up later but Diamond is fantastic and the Rangers have never seen him before. Don't want to lose any more cents from this and I'm about to be out of commission for a couple hours.
last time I had the Twins in Arlington they were a 70-cent dog and Perkins blew a 3-1 lead in the 9th. Hopefully different this time...
add Minnesota ML (+157) @ Texas -Locking it in now, will try to write it up later but Diamond is fantastic and the Rangers have never seen him before. Don't want to lose any more cents from this and I'm about to be out of commission for a couple hours.
Looks like RL was the play....i took the juicy ML and that damn Darren Oliver turned a W into a loss with one pitch
sorry to hear that, it's tough enough when taking a big dog to get a lead and it's excruciating when they blow it.
Hopefully that's the only one of the day, not sure I could handle Perkins costing me a big dog in the same setting tonight like he did earlier in the year...
Looks like RL was the play....i took the juicy ML and that damn Darren Oliver turned a W into a loss with one pitch
sorry to hear that, it's tough enough when taking a big dog to get a lead and it's excruciating when they blow it.
Hopefully that's the only one of the day, not sure I could handle Perkins costing me a big dog in the same setting tonight like he did earlier in the year...
Its all good, you expect it with a dog that big, just asking for a close game with a shot to win (and i got that). Good luck on the Twins, no way Roy should be laying this kind of chalk
Its all good, you expect it with a dog that big, just asking for a close game with a shot to win (and i got that). Good luck on the Twins, no way Roy should be laying this kind of chalk
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.