You won't find very many days whre you have 4 or 5 fav over -180. But like today there were quite a few and I'm playing all of them be. But mostly I play the 2 highest lines each day over -175 or so.. and alot of times I will take 4 like today and do a round robin with them on ML or RL
Gotcha, that clears it up for me. Still not too good at betting, although I have dabbled for about two years now. So I am always looking for new aspects about the hobby. Have you used this method for years now? 1,500 to 2 g's a baseball season sounds pretty awesome !
You won't find very many days whre you have 4 or 5 fav over -180. But like today there were quite a few and I'm playing all of them be. But mostly I play the 2 highest lines each day over -175 or so.. and alot of times I will take 4 like today and do a round robin with them on ML or RL
Gotcha, that clears it up for me. Still not too good at betting, although I have dabbled for about two years now. So I am always looking for new aspects about the hobby. Have you used this method for years now? 1,500 to 2 g's a baseball season sounds pretty awesome !
Gotcha, that clears it up for me. Still not too good at betting, although I have dabbled for about two years now. So I am always looking for new aspects about the hobby. Have you used this method for years now? 1,500 to 2 g's a baseball season sounds pretty awesome !
No, this style is new a new find. start off slow bro and dont' ever go crazy off of what someone else posts no matter how good it looks. Play a few on paper for a week and if you see it play out like is stated then jump in with both feet. Its a winner but I want you to do it at your own pace and confidence.
Gotcha, that clears it up for me. Still not too good at betting, although I have dabbled for about two years now. So I am always looking for new aspects about the hobby. Have you used this method for years now? 1,500 to 2 g's a baseball season sounds pretty awesome !
No, this style is new a new find. start off slow bro and dont' ever go crazy off of what someone else posts no matter how good it looks. Play a few on paper for a week and if you see it play out like is stated then jump in with both feet. Its a winner but I want you to do it at your own pace and confidence.
Just a nickel's worth of free advice, your stats from SQDL show good return playing the -$180 or higher ML for a flat $100. I love a parlay and a RL as much as the next guy (have HOU ML and RL tonight). Just sayin'.
BOL
I got the same my friend. got both.. we just scored so we're back covering the RL again 5-2
FYI Brewers score more than 1 run 89% of the time when they win and Tigers lose by more than 1 run 78% of the time.. so I'm very confident on my RL bet. these are stats that nobody without SDQL can pull up.
Just a nickel's worth of free advice, your stats from SQDL show good return playing the -$180 or higher ML for a flat $100. I love a parlay and a RL as much as the next guy (have HOU ML and RL tonight). Just sayin'.
BOL
I got the same my friend. got both.. we just scored so we're back covering the RL again 5-2
FYI Brewers score more than 1 run 89% of the time when they win and Tigers lose by more than 1 run 78% of the time.. so I'm very confident on my RL bet. these are stats that nobody without SDQL can pull up.
No, this style is new a new find. start off slow bro and dont' ever go crazy off of what someone else posts no matter how good it looks. Play a few on paper for a week and if you see it play out like is stated then jump in with both feet. Its a winner but I want you to do it at your own pace and confidence.
Solid advice, Thanks bro. Gonna play it for pocket change for a week or so just to keep it fun. But honestly, its great to get advice on here and not people just talking smack all the time. Great to see the forum used like it should be.
No, this style is new a new find. start off slow bro and dont' ever go crazy off of what someone else posts no matter how good it looks. Play a few on paper for a week and if you see it play out like is stated then jump in with both feet. Its a winner but I want you to do it at your own pace and confidence.
Solid advice, Thanks bro. Gonna play it for pocket change for a week or so just to keep it fun. But honestly, its great to get advice on here and not people just talking smack all the time. Great to see the forum used like it should be.
Solid advice, Thanks bro. Gonna play it for pocket change for a week or so just to keep it fun. But honestly, its great to get advice on here and not people just talking smack all the time. Great to see the forum used like it should be.
Solid advice, Thanks bro. Gonna play it for pocket change for a week or so just to keep it fun. But honestly, its great to get advice on here and not people just talking smack all the time. Great to see the forum used like it should be.
So long story short... What you're saying is play every fav, all season long, at -180 or higher at $100.00 each play? And you will make a solid profit?
Obviously some day will be 4-5. Some days will be 1-2 fav -180 or higher, some might be none. But play all the favs throughout the course of the year at -180 or higher at $100 each bet and you'll make a good profit?
So long story short... What you're saying is play every fav, all season long, at -180 or higher at $100.00 each play? And you will make a solid profit?
Obviously some day will be 4-5. Some days will be 1-2 fav -180 or higher, some might be none. But play all the favs throughout the course of the year at -180 or higher at $100 each bet and you'll make a good profit?
So long story short... What you're saying is play every fav, all season long, at -180 or higher at $100.00 each play? And you will make a solid profit?
Obviously some day will be 4-5. Some days will be 1-2 fav -180 or higher, some might be none. But play all the favs throughout the course of the year at -180 or higher at $100 each bet and you'll make a good profit?
Thanks.
Dudes - realize something here - yes the numbers support this with hindsight being 20-20.
But two things:
1.) What about other years, full years going back 5, 10 years? Could the success of the previous 3 years foretell a regression this year?
more importantly
2.) can your Martingale Bankroll sustain an avg -$190 lay and having a slump of 11-2 somewhere in the middle, a bad week for the system, and taking a -18 unit hit? only to come back the next day with 4 games @ -$190, risking another 7.6 units?
Not bashing just bringing up some points to think about....
So long story short... What you're saying is play every fav, all season long, at -180 or higher at $100.00 each play? And you will make a solid profit?
Obviously some day will be 4-5. Some days will be 1-2 fav -180 or higher, some might be none. But play all the favs throughout the course of the year at -180 or higher at $100 each bet and you'll make a good profit?
Thanks.
Dudes - realize something here - yes the numbers support this with hindsight being 20-20.
But two things:
1.) What about other years, full years going back 5, 10 years? Could the success of the previous 3 years foretell a regression this year?
more importantly
2.) can your Martingale Bankroll sustain an avg -$190 lay and having a slump of 11-2 somewhere in the middle, a bad week for the system, and taking a -18 unit hit? only to come back the next day with 4 games @ -$190, risking another 7.6 units?
Not bashing just bringing up some points to think about....
Just saying betting Fav of -180 or greater is profitable . Play it however you want, Even playing it blind for the past 4 years has been profitable. I Play most of them but usually play the biggest fav or 2 big fav and parlay them most of the time. Dont' shy away from big fav of -200 or -250 . they win more than 80% of the time.
I can look up the NHL but it's down for some reason right now.
to each his own @bearneybeans..
You do what you want with this info. fade it, follow it, learn from it or call it whatever you want. The stats don't lie and I will run it till the wheels fall off instead of hours of non sense stats comping and betting the -110 for a lucky win. TO EACH HIS OWN.
Tonight I'm 8-0 and looking to be 11-0 with 4 different parlays about to hit. for tonight.. dont' want to jinx it till its' over but that's not luck no matter how you look at it. walking away with wads of cash even I don't win anothe rgame for the rest of the night.. but Dodgers, Dbacks, and Pirates literally have to take a dump to lose all 3
Just saying betting Fav of -180 or greater is profitable . Play it however you want, Even playing it blind for the past 4 years has been profitable. I Play most of them but usually play the biggest fav or 2 big fav and parlay them most of the time. Dont' shy away from big fav of -200 or -250 . they win more than 80% of the time.
I can look up the NHL but it's down for some reason right now.
to each his own @bearneybeans..
You do what you want with this info. fade it, follow it, learn from it or call it whatever you want. The stats don't lie and I will run it till the wheels fall off instead of hours of non sense stats comping and betting the -110 for a lucky win. TO EACH HIS OWN.
Tonight I'm 8-0 and looking to be 11-0 with 4 different parlays about to hit. for tonight.. dont' want to jinx it till its' over but that's not luck no matter how you look at it. walking away with wads of cash even I don't win anothe rgame for the rest of the night.. but Dodgers, Dbacks, and Pirates literally have to take a dump to lose all 3
This is impossible because some days there are several -200 and more favorites running concurrently.
you don't get it bro. you play the big ones or roll it over from day before if you want to that days play. play 1 big fav a day if you scared. the biggest 1. I can afford doing multiples. whatever floats your boat but dont' knock it till you have a system in place. I have mine. or you can go back betting your dogs . good luck either way
This is impossible because some days there are several -200 and more favorites running concurrently.
you don't get it bro. you play the big ones or roll it over from day before if you want to that days play. play 1 big fav a day if you scared. the biggest 1. I can afford doing multiples. whatever floats your boat but dont' knock it till you have a system in place. I have mine. or you can go back betting your dogs . good luck either way
lets make this simple. dont' chase don't do sht. Just bet -180 and over everyday and you'll win rest of the season. is this simple enough for you? you'll win some and you'll lose some but at the end you'll be in the +
lets make this simple. dont' chase don't do sht. Just bet -180 and over everyday and you'll win rest of the season. is this simple enough for you? you'll win some and you'll lose some but at the end you'll be in the +
you don't get it bro. you play the big ones or roll it over from day before if you want to that days play. play 1 big fav a day if you scared. the biggest 1. I can afford doing multiples. whatever floats your boat but dont' knock it till you have a system in place. I have mine. or you can go back betting your dogs . good luck either way
Bro, no disrespect intended - I wholeheartedly concur in all of my posts - especially my 9:21:31 PM.
In order for the strategy/play > -$180 to work and yield the posted awesome results - just like in your query, YOU NEED TO PLAY ALL OF THE GAMES - because that is the query you ran and the results you presented.
If you did run a query for only "the largest single favorite for that day" and you posted it above well, I missed it.
Bottom line is I agree with your query results of every game @ -$180 or higher for the whole season perhaps throwing out April. The query results support it.
But if you run a simulation against the years you posted about I would suspect from personal experience that there would be a losing streak somewhere in the middle, perhaps a few in the season that could cause one to play with scared money, lower their bets, sit out a few weeks to recuperate and miss some profitable weeks.
You excellent analysis does not account for somone playing it willy nilly. They have to play it as per your query in order to get the query results. And they must have a solid bankroll to weather the dips and stay in the game - just like the query does.
You say "the stats don't lie" and you are correct - but if somone tries to get cute and second guess the results of the query and pick and choose their spots ("play 1 big fav a day if you scared. the biggest 1") they will probably do worse than the query.
That's all I'm saying = be true to the query results and have a solid bankroll.
you don't get it bro. you play the big ones or roll it over from day before if you want to that days play. play 1 big fav a day if you scared. the biggest 1. I can afford doing multiples. whatever floats your boat but dont' knock it till you have a system in place. I have mine. or you can go back betting your dogs . good luck either way
Bro, no disrespect intended - I wholeheartedly concur in all of my posts - especially my 9:21:31 PM.
In order for the strategy/play > -$180 to work and yield the posted awesome results - just like in your query, YOU NEED TO PLAY ALL OF THE GAMES - because that is the query you ran and the results you presented.
If you did run a query for only "the largest single favorite for that day" and you posted it above well, I missed it.
Bottom line is I agree with your query results of every game @ -$180 or higher for the whole season perhaps throwing out April. The query results support it.
But if you run a simulation against the years you posted about I would suspect from personal experience that there would be a losing streak somewhere in the middle, perhaps a few in the season that could cause one to play with scared money, lower their bets, sit out a few weeks to recuperate and miss some profitable weeks.
You excellent analysis does not account for somone playing it willy nilly. They have to play it as per your query in order to get the query results. And they must have a solid bankroll to weather the dips and stay in the game - just like the query does.
You say "the stats don't lie" and you are correct - but if somone tries to get cute and second guess the results of the query and pick and choose their spots ("play 1 big fav a day if you scared. the biggest 1") they will probably do worse than the query.
That's all I'm saying = be true to the query results and have a solid bankroll.
lets make this simple. dont' chase don't do sht. Just bet -180 and over everyday and you'll win rest of the season. is this simple enough for you? you'll win some and you'll lose some but at the end you'll be in the +
lets make this simple. dont' chase don't do sht. Just bet -180 and over everyday and you'll win rest of the season. is this simple enough for you? you'll win some and you'll lose some but at the end you'll be in the +
lets make this simple. dont' chase don't do sht. Just bet -180 and over everyday and you'll win rest of the season. is this simple enough for you? you'll win some and you'll lose some but at the end you'll be in the +
lets make this simple. dont' chase don't do sht. Just bet -180 and over everyday and you'll win rest of the season. is this simple enough for you? you'll win some and you'll lose some but at the end you'll be in the +
@Barneybeans, that post wasn't intended towards you bro, it was to the guy who jumped in an said it's impossible.
I did post the query for the biggest bet per day in 2017 and that's at 75% +$1335 for the year so far and I can run it for the earlier years if you want as well , they are all + money. I listed the query in my post. if you know SDQL and you can run it
to be in the + at that money yes, it is based on you playing all -180 or better for the season . but if you see the stats they are winners over 75% of the time. You can turn those MLs to -1 RL you can even decrease your loses and risk amounts even lower.
The whole thing about this post was. Don't be scared of big chalk. take it for what it's worth. that's it for me . Good night
@Barneybeans, that post wasn't intended towards you bro, it was to the guy who jumped in an said it's impossible.
I did post the query for the biggest bet per day in 2017 and that's at 75% +$1335 for the year so far and I can run it for the earlier years if you want as well , they are all + money. I listed the query in my post. if you know SDQL and you can run it
to be in the + at that money yes, it is based on you playing all -180 or better for the season . but if you see the stats they are winners over 75% of the time. You can turn those MLs to -1 RL you can even decrease your loses and risk amounts even lower.
The whole thing about this post was. Don't be scared of big chalk. take it for what it's worth. that's it for me . Good night
@Barneybeans, that post wasn't intended towards you bro, it was to the guy who jumped in an said it's impossible.
I did post the query for the biggest bet per day in 2017 and that's at 75% +$1335 for the year so far and I can run it for the earlier years if you want as well , they are all + money. I listed the query in my post. if you know SDQL and you can run it
to be in the + at that money yes, it is based on you playing all -180 or better for the season . but if you see the stats they are winners over 75% of the time. You can turn those MLs to -1 RL you can even decrease your loses and risk amounts even lower.
The whole thing about this post was. Don't be scared of big chalk. take it for what it's worth. that's it for me . Good night
@Barneybeans, that post wasn't intended towards you bro, it was to the guy who jumped in an said it's impossible.
I did post the query for the biggest bet per day in 2017 and that's at 75% +$1335 for the year so far and I can run it for the earlier years if you want as well , they are all + money. I listed the query in my post. if you know SDQL and you can run it
to be in the + at that money yes, it is based on you playing all -180 or better for the season . but if you see the stats they are winners over 75% of the time. You can turn those MLs to -1 RL you can even decrease your loses and risk amounts even lower.
The whole thing about this post was. Don't be scared of big chalk. take it for what it's worth. that's it for me . Good night
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.