Summary Record: 131-127-3 (51%) Beginning Bankroll: $10,000 Avg. Wager Size: $107.16 (Unit = 1% of Bankroll); +101 avg line Profit: +$436.93 (+4.37 Units), +1.56% Return on Risk
----------------------------------------------------------- Performance History -----------------------------------------------------------
Overall 2017: 131-127-3 (51%), +1.56% Return on Risk 2016: 259-224-20 (54%), +3.80% Return on Risk 2015: 298-267-32 (53%), +6.46% Return on Risk 2014: 826-685-112 (55%), +4.13% Return on Risk
Picks of the Day 2017: 58-41-1 (59%), +14.04% Return on Risk 2016: 81-65-7 (55%), +6.90% Return on Risk 2015: 108-87-12 (55%), +14.17% Return on Risk 2014: 121-72-16 (63%), +16.60% Return on Risk
Tough last inning losses in both the Cards under (+103) and the Reds (+166) game (up by 4 and gave up 6!). Good thing the PODs went 2-0 and I still came out in the green. But still... cannot believe the Reds blew that one; d@mn you Igeslias!
Cincinnati/San Diego Over 8.5 -114, Arroyo/Perdomo Playable to 9 runs at -110 or better as a POD.
Colorado Rockies +135, Freeland/Taillon Playable as a POD to +110 and playable to -110 as a regular play.
Chicago White Sox +105, Miley/Pelfrey This one is not for the faint heart, but everything points to the White Sox and so much so that I capped them at -120. Scariest words out of my mouth considering how much I loath Pelfrey.
Atlanta/Washington Under 8 +105, Foltynewicz/Strasburg
Some of these lines are weird numbers (e.g., -114), but one of my books offers reduced lines and I take advantage of it... I guess there is a positive in not signing up when there is a promotional offer. Without reduced juice the Over is -120 and the Rockies are +133.
Summary Record: 131-127-3 (51%) Beginning Bankroll: $10,000 Avg. Wager Size: $107.16 (Unit = 1% of Bankroll); +101 avg line Profit: +$436.93 (+4.37 Units), +1.56% Return on Risk
----------------------------------------------------------- Performance History -----------------------------------------------------------
Overall 2017: 131-127-3 (51%), +1.56% Return on Risk 2016: 259-224-20 (54%), +3.80% Return on Risk 2015: 298-267-32 (53%), +6.46% Return on Risk 2014: 826-685-112 (55%), +4.13% Return on Risk
Picks of the Day 2017: 58-41-1 (59%), +14.04% Return on Risk 2016: 81-65-7 (55%), +6.90% Return on Risk 2015: 108-87-12 (55%), +14.17% Return on Risk 2014: 121-72-16 (63%), +16.60% Return on Risk
Tough last inning losses in both the Cards under (+103) and the Reds (+166) game (up by 4 and gave up 6!). Good thing the PODs went 2-0 and I still came out in the green. But still... cannot believe the Reds blew that one; d@mn you Igeslias!
Cincinnati/San Diego Over 8.5 -114, Arroyo/Perdomo Playable to 9 runs at -110 or better as a POD.
Colorado Rockies +135, Freeland/Taillon Playable as a POD to +110 and playable to -110 as a regular play.
Chicago White Sox +105, Miley/Pelfrey This one is not for the faint heart, but everything points to the White Sox and so much so that I capped them at -120. Scariest words out of my mouth considering how much I loath Pelfrey.
Atlanta/Washington Under 8 +105, Foltynewicz/Strasburg
Some of these lines are weird numbers (e.g., -114), but one of my books offers reduced lines and I take advantage of it... I guess there is a positive in not signing up when there is a promotional offer. Without reduced juice the Over is -120 and the Rockies are +133.
Interesting. I capped the Os to be a small favorite at 51% odds of winning. That being said, I probably won't play it. Baltimore seems to be in flux without Machado. I bet they are happy to get out of the Bronx. They took quite the beating the past two days.
Rockies line looks off to me. I capped Pittsburgh as the favorite, but not as a -140 favorite.
Interesting. I capped the Os to be a small favorite at 51% odds of winning. That being said, I probably won't play it. Baltimore seems to be in flux without Machado. I bet they are happy to get out of the Bronx. They took quite the beating the past two days.
Rockies line looks off to me. I capped Pittsburgh as the favorite, but not as a -140 favorite.
There's a conspiracy theory that Vegas/MLB will award Pittsburgh the big W this game to appreciate the starting pitcher returning from testicular cancer surgery. Of course this theory was conjured up in my brain. Look for Pittsburgh to miraculously win this game
There's a conspiracy theory that Vegas/MLB will award Pittsburgh the big W this game to appreciate the starting pitcher returning from testicular cancer surgery. Of course this theory was conjured up in my brain. Look for Pittsburgh to miraculously win this game
Pelfrey 1.69 era last 4 games pitched. Watching his last outing though he was hanging on a string with every pitch. Surprised he didn't give up more. But at the same time he got out of the jams he created.
Pelfrey 1.69 era last 4 games pitched. Watching his last outing though he was hanging on a string with every pitch. Surprised he didn't give up more. But at the same time he got out of the jams he created.
Pelfrey 1.69 era last 4 games pitched. Watching his last outing though he was hanging on a string with every pitch. Surprised he didn't give up more. But at the same time he got out of the jams he created.
Good Luck BoB
Pelfrey doesn't get my money, PERIOD. Where are the SABRmetrics boys with their "he has to regress" posts?
BOL BoB
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
Pelfrey 1.69 era last 4 games pitched. Watching his last outing though he was hanging on a string with every pitch. Surprised he didn't give up more. But at the same time he got out of the jams he created.
Good Luck BoB
Pelfrey doesn't get my money, PERIOD. Where are the SABRmetrics boys with their "he has to regress" posts?
By the Bay. You're making us in the Bay look bad. Make you own friggen plays and stop with all the whining.
"I tailed him and then him and now you". I mean what the hell is the fun of this hobby if you aren't even making your own picks. Only on this forum....
That Braves under was playing with fire from the start "as I pointed out a before your whiny posts"
By the Bay. You're making us in the Bay look bad. Make you own friggen plays and stop with all the whining.
"I tailed him and then him and now you". I mean what the hell is the fun of this hobby if you aren't even making your own picks. Only on this forum....
That Braves under was playing with fire from the start "as I pointed out a before your whiny posts"
There's a conspiracy theory that Vegas/MLB will award Pittsburgh the big W this game to appreciate the starting pitcher returning from testicular cancer surgery. Of course this theory was conjured up in my brain. Look for Pittsburgh to miraculously win this game
There's a conspiracy theory that Vegas/MLB will award Pittsburgh the big W this game to appreciate the starting pitcher returning from testicular cancer surgery. Of course this theory was conjured up in my brain. Look for Pittsburgh to miraculously win this game
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.