I was actually giving more credit past the revolutionary war since we were building the country and some of these freedoms were in the building stage.
You cannot fear government at every turn, that seems to haunt you, and it is playing right into the hands of the NRA.
You are being a lackey for the gun lobby, we dont have to carry guns to keep the government away, if it gets to that point in society, then the guns we carry wont save us.
agreed
so why even let them get one step closer
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
I was actually giving more credit past the revolutionary war since we were building the country and some of these freedoms were in the building stage.
You cannot fear government at every turn, that seems to haunt you, and it is playing right into the hands of the NRA.
You are being a lackey for the gun lobby, we dont have to carry guns to keep the government away, if it gets to that point in society, then the guns we carry wont save us.
My problem is not people owning weapons its that the NRA has so much
power that almost any and all weapons are able to be purchased and that
is wrong.
We dont need military weapons in our houses or on the streets, yet
because of the power of the NRA, nobody will stop or limit the scope of
weapons due to their money and influence.
The NRA is responsible for killing thousands of people a year, all under the phony guise of "freedom to bear arms".
You are VERY ignorant. THOUSANDS of people die from ILLEGAL weapons from a VAST MAJORITY of REPEAT FELONS.
If you feel like that then USA government will follow what Australia and England has done... ban ALL of the guns and retrospect crime rose thereafter especially in Australia.
I guess ignorance is BLISS.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
My problem is not people owning weapons its that the NRA has so much
power that almost any and all weapons are able to be purchased and that
is wrong.
We dont need military weapons in our houses or on the streets, yet
because of the power of the NRA, nobody will stop or limit the scope of
weapons due to their money and influence.
The NRA is responsible for killing thousands of people a year, all under the phony guise of "freedom to bear arms".
You are VERY ignorant. THOUSANDS of people die from ILLEGAL weapons from a VAST MAJORITY of REPEAT FELONS.
If you feel like that then USA government will follow what Australia and England has done... ban ALL of the guns and retrospect crime rose thereafter especially in Australia.
Read the entire thread before you call someone ignorant.
Military weapons and ammunition which is extreme serves zero purpose in society, if you think that felons kill people then how many MORE people are killed with automatic weapons?
Yeah lets make it as easy as possible to kill as many people as possible in the shortest length of time, all under the guise of personal freedom and the constitution.
Real bright, and thanks for proving the point.
0
Read the entire thread before you call someone ignorant.
Military weapons and ammunition which is extreme serves zero purpose in society, if you think that felons kill people then how many MORE people are killed with automatic weapons?
Yeah lets make it as easy as possible to kill as many people as possible in the shortest length of time, all under the guise of personal freedom and the constitution.
Give me a break. In addition to what WSC said in post #47, Why don't you go look at other western nations which do not allow everyone to carry guns and see if the crime rate is 50% higher than the US.
My guess would be that the crime rate is not only not higher at all, but probably lower.
You think people will only respect their neighbour if they live in fear of him and need to carry a gun that can kill 100's of people in seconds....
That society can ONLY function in this way and that if it wasn't like this crime would rise 50%
Get serious. If you make that arguement all you're saying is that Americans are to petty and immature to handle this (which I assume they're not!) Because despite what you guys choose to believe, societies can still function without massive crime when guns aren't readily available to anyone. All hell does not break loose in civilized societies just because everyone is not allowed to own automatic weapons.
I'm making this statement with the assumption the US can be considered a modern civilized society. But some of the arguements against it are making me second guess this assumption.
Again, IGNORANCE IS BLISS. Crime rate of ALL countries that chose to ban firearms rose the immediate year and never went down lower than the last year that firearms were legal.
FACT
0
Quote Originally Posted by DiscoD69:
Give me a break. In addition to what WSC said in post #47, Why don't you go look at other western nations which do not allow everyone to carry guns and see if the crime rate is 50% higher than the US.
My guess would be that the crime rate is not only not higher at all, but probably lower.
You think people will only respect their neighbour if they live in fear of him and need to carry a gun that can kill 100's of people in seconds....
That society can ONLY function in this way and that if it wasn't like this crime would rise 50%
Get serious. If you make that arguement all you're saying is that Americans are to petty and immature to handle this (which I assume they're not!) Because despite what you guys choose to believe, societies can still function without massive crime when guns aren't readily available to anyone. All hell does not break loose in civilized societies just because everyone is not allowed to own automatic weapons.
I'm making this statement with the assumption the US can be considered a modern civilized society. But some of the arguements against it are making me second guess this assumption.
Again, IGNORANCE IS BLISS. Crime rate of ALL countries that chose to ban firearms rose the immediate year and never went down lower than the last year that firearms were legal.
Read the entire thread before you call someone ignorant.
Military weapons and ammunition which is extreme serves zero purpose in society, if you think that felons kill people then how many MORE people are killed with automatic weapons?
Yeah lets make it as easy as possible to kill as many people as possible in the shortest length of time, all under the guise of personal freedom and the constitution.
Real bright, and thanks for proving the point.
FACT. Australia and England used the same points like you and other Ignorant liberals use to EVENTUALLY ban ALL firearms.
FACT
Point prove again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Read the entire thread before you call someone ignorant.
Military weapons and ammunition which is extreme serves zero purpose in society, if you think that felons kill people then how many MORE people are killed with automatic weapons?
Yeah lets make it as easy as possible to kill as many people as possible in the shortest length of time, all under the guise of personal freedom and the constitution.
Real bright, and thanks for proving the point.
FACT. Australia and England used the same points like you and other Ignorant liberals use to EVENTUALLY ban ALL firearms.
FACT. Australia and England used the same points like you and other Ignorant liberals use to EVENTUALLY ban ALL firearms.
FACT
Point prove again.
The Australian and English govt's started with big arms to eventually and easily ban small arms.
FACT
Governments use broad, vague legislation to circum the whole thing.... like the do with certain drugs: ie - cannabis (non killer).. while relating it to similar lockup time in par with cocaine, etc. I'm giving out examples how government gets TOO involved.
FACT
0
Quote Originally Posted by King-of-the-NFL:
FACT. Australia and England used the same points like you and other Ignorant liberals use to EVENTUALLY ban ALL firearms.
FACT
Point prove again.
The Australian and English govt's started with big arms to eventually and easily ban small arms.
FACT
Governments use broad, vague legislation to circum the whole thing.... like the do with certain drugs: ie - cannabis (non killer).. while relating it to similar lockup time in par with cocaine, etc. I'm giving out examples how government gets TOO involved.
with all the said i think people are crazy with their guns and they dont necessarily need them. i also think people with illegal handguns etc should be sentenced to something on par with attempted murder and not just the little bullshit they get. theres only one reason to have an illegal gun and that is to shoot illegally.
0
with all the said i think people are crazy with their guns and they dont necessarily need them. i also think people with illegal handguns etc should be sentenced to something on par with attempted murder and not just the little bullshit they get. theres only one reason to have an illegal gun and that is to shoot illegally.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.