• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 6
      NFL Week 6
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Seahawks-Broncos Early Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • Week 6 Odds
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Football

    The committee should be emabarased.

    marksb79
    monkeybutt
    mikebdb
    icemantbi
    gotime
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 977
    Posts: 25
     
    marksb79
    marksb79
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 1746
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 9:11 PM ET #1

    Tell me. Note dame at Oregon and Texas at ole  miss  wouldn’t be better 

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    Tell me. Note dame at Oregon and Texas at ole  miss  wouldn’t be better 

     
    monkeybutt
    monkeybutt
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2017
    Posts: 739
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 9:17 PM ET #2

    what could they be embarrassed about? jmu and tulane were not options. they were auto bids based on the rules set before the season started.

    Reply

    what could they be embarrassed about? jmu and tulane were not options. they were auto bids based on the rules set before the season started.

     
    mikebdb
    mikebdb
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2012
    Posts: 11785
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 9:19 PM ET #3

    After game are basically over comment also

    Reply

    After game are basically over comment also

     
    marksb79
    marksb79
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 1746
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 9:21 PM ET #4

    These games are trash. 

    Reply

    These games are trash. 

     
    icemantbi
    icemantbi
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 34619
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 9:22 PM ET #5

    I say keep it as is easy money I mean some of the easiest money made on ole piss and Oregon an_roll_laugh

    Reply

    I say keep it as is easy money I mean some of the easiest money made on ole piss and Oregon an_roll_laugh

     
    marksb79
    marksb79
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 1746
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 9:26 PM ET #6

    @icemantbi

     Yea true I’m on Oregon 1st half and the over.   

    Reply

    @icemantbi

     Yea true I’m on Oregon 1st half and the over.   

     
    gotime
    gotime
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 2925
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 9:27 PM ET #7

    @marksb79

     

     

    @monkeybutt

     You both are right. CFP had stated that they wanted to put the 12 best teams in the playoffs. They also as stated did set certain rules. You could also include BYU, UTAH and Vanderbilt as being much more up to the task. In one game elimination there is always the chance that either team could win. NCAA March Madness is proof of this. Look at what Alabama did. No one had done that in the CFP. 

    Reply

    @marksb79

     

     

    @monkeybutt

     You both are right. CFP had stated that they wanted to put the 12 best teams in the playoffs. They also as stated did set certain rules. You could also include BYU, UTAH and Vanderbilt as being much more up to the task. In one game elimination there is always the chance that either team could win. NCAA March Madness is proof of this. Look at what Alabama did. No one had done that in the CFP. 

     
    gotime
    gotime
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 2925
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 9:27 PM ET #8

    @marksb79

     

    @monkeybutt

     You both are right. CFP had stated that they wanted to put the 12 best teams in the playoffs. They also as stated did set certain rules. You could also include BYU, UTAH and Vanderbilt as being much more up to the task. In one game elimination there is always the chance that either team could win. NCAA March Madness is proof of this. 

    Reply

    @marksb79

     

    @monkeybutt

     You both are right. CFP had stated that they wanted to put the 12 best teams in the playoffs. They also as stated did set certain rules. You could also include BYU, UTAH and Vanderbilt as being much more up to the task. In one game elimination there is always the chance that either team could win. NCAA March Madness is proof of this. 

     
    newmarket
    newmarket
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2013
    Posts: 8734
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 9:35 PM ET #9

    Can't have another SEC match up

    Oregon Vandy

    Ole Miss Irish 

    Reply

    Can't have another SEC match up

    Oregon Vandy

    Ole Miss Irish 

     
    smellybunty
    smellybunty
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2018
    Posts: 9918
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 9:54 PM ET #10

    Just go back to a 4 game playoff

    Reply

    Just go back to a 4 game playoff

     
    camby700
    camby700
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 34392
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 10:03 PM ET #11

    Rules need to be changed...

    Tulane golf team would be more competitive than.those scrubs today 

    Reply

    Rules need to be changed...

    Tulane golf team would be more competitive than.those scrubs today 

     
    kammer55
    kammer55
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 3276
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2025 - 10:33 PM ET #12

    @marksb79

     Do you even watch football they were automatic bids

    cheech1972
    Reply

    @marksb79

     Do you even watch football they were automatic bids

     
    Peezy9166
    Peezy9166
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2025
    Posts: 338
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2025 - 1:28 AM ET #13

    @icemantbi

     Facts, I wish it was always like this

    #CashMeOut
    Reply

    @icemantbi

     Facts, I wish it was always like this

     
    Win4Ever
    Win4Ever
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2015
    Posts: 1830
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2025 - 1:34 AM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by monkeybutt:

    what could they be embarrassed about? jmu and tulane were not options. they were auto bids based on the rules set before the season started.

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but it was only ONE automatic bid required for the special Olympic conferences right?  It was the highest ranked team from the scrub conference that got the auto bid.  So how the hell did we land on TWO this year?  JMU - Tulane, debate how you want.  One gets in to to get smashed, the other is at the Idaho Potato bowl.  So how did one of these teams get in over a Notre Dame, BYU, Utah?

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by monkeybutt:

    what could they be embarrassed about? jmu and tulane were not options. they were auto bids based on the rules set before the season started.

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but it was only ONE automatic bid required for the special Olympic conferences right?  It was the highest ranked team from the scrub conference that got the auto bid.  So how the hell did we land on TWO this year?  JMU - Tulane, debate how you want.  One gets in to to get smashed, the other is at the Idaho Potato bowl.  So how did one of these teams get in over a Notre Dame, BYU, Utah?

     
    LonghornHoosier
    LonghornHoosier
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 12310
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2025 - 3:46 AM ET #15

    yep…Right now that would be Indiana, Georgia, Ohio State, and Texas Tech….Those are the only teams that have a legitimate chance to win the NC!


    Quote Originally Posted by smellybunty:

    Just go back to a 4 game playoff

    LonghornHoosier
    Reply

    yep…Right now that would be Indiana, Georgia, Ohio State, and Texas Tech….Those are the only teams that have a legitimate chance to win the NC!


    Quote Originally Posted by smellybunty:

    Just go back to a 4 game playoff

     
    Kaname484
    Kaname484
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2010
    Posts: 9562
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2025 - 4:18 AM ET #16

    @gotime

    I'm still waiting for the 12 best teams 

    Reply

    @gotime

    I'm still waiting for the 12 best teams 

     
    monkeybutt
    monkeybutt
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2017
    Posts: 739
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2025 - 4:24 AM ET #17

    @Win4Ever

     it is the 5 highest ranked conference champ's. in a normal year the acc champ would be one of those 5 automatic bids. 5 loss duke won the acc championship tho...

    Reply

    @Win4Ever

     it is the 5 highest ranked conference champ's. in a normal year the acc champ would be one of those 5 automatic bids. 5 loss duke won the acc championship tho...

     
    Moose6836
    Moose6836
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 5714
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2025 - 6:29 AM ET #18

    It’s only going to get worse when they expand to 16/24 teams
    Reply
    It’s only going to get worse when they expand to 16/24 teams
     
    bigred84
    bigred84
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2016
    Posts: 24500
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2025 - 6:36 AM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by icemantbi:

    I say keep it as is easy money I mean some of the easiest money made on ole piss and Oregon

    an_roll_laugh

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by icemantbi:

    I say keep it as is easy money I mean some of the easiest money made on ole piss and Oregon

    an_roll_laugh

     
    Fuse
    Fuse
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2016
    Posts: 85070
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2025 - 8:00 AM ET #20

    surprised

    Learn, be content and stay disciplined.
    Reply

    surprised

     
    Win4Ever
    Win4Ever
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2015
    Posts: 1830
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2025 - 9:36 AM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by monkeybutt:

    @Win4Ever  it is the 5 highest ranked conference champ's. in a normal year the acc champ would be one of those 5 automatic bids. 5 loss duke won the acc championship tho...

     

    That’s right.  Thank you for the clarification.  Well last year Boise shit themselves to the tune of not allowing the JV team to get a first round bye.  Now after yesterday’s shitshow we will probably get further changes to never allow that to happen again.  

    I would have rather seen Duke over those teams.  Mensah is one of the best QBs in the country.  But yeah, they would have likely got walloped also.  

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by monkeybutt:

    @Win4Ever  it is the 5 highest ranked conference champ's. in a normal year the acc champ would be one of those 5 automatic bids. 5 loss duke won the acc championship tho...

     

    That’s right.  Thank you for the clarification.  Well last year Boise shit themselves to the tune of not allowing the JV team to get a first round bye.  Now after yesterday’s shitshow we will probably get further changes to never allow that to happen again.  

    I would have rather seen Duke over those teams.  Mensah is one of the best QBs in the country.  But yeah, they would have likely got walloped also.  

     
    Boisestateand8
    Boisestateand8
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2018
    Posts: 2162
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2025 - 10:15 AM ET #22

    Quote Originally Posted by Win4Ever:

    Quote Originally Posted by monkeybutt: what could they be embarrassed about? jmu and tulane were not options. they were auto bids based on the rules set before the season started. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but it was only ONE automatic bid required for the special Olympic conferences right?  It was the highest ranked team from the scrub conference that got the auto bid.  So how the hell did we land on TWO this year?  JMU - Tulane, debate how you want.  One gets in to to get smashed, the other is at the Idaho Potato bowl.  So how did one of these teams get in over a Notre Dame, BYU, Utah?

    It's not the committee's fault that the ACC sucked this year.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Win4Ever:

    Quote Originally Posted by monkeybutt: what could they be embarrassed about? jmu and tulane were not options. they were auto bids based on the rules set before the season started. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but it was only ONE automatic bid required for the special Olympic conferences right?  It was the highest ranked team from the scrub conference that got the auto bid.  So how the hell did we land on TWO this year?  JMU - Tulane, debate how you want.  One gets in to to get smashed, the other is at the Idaho Potato bowl.  So how did one of these teams get in over a Notre Dame, BYU, Utah?

    It's not the committee's fault that the ACC sucked this year.

     
    jefff
    jefff
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 1999
    Posts: 4024
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2025 - 10:49 AM ET #23

    this is just the 2nd year of the CFP.  It was going to take time and rules changes to get to a better place.  If they are smart, they adjust with conference champs so that the G5 teams dont just get an auto bid because the ACC sucked yet again.  And if the ACC is smart, they give some leeway so their BEST teams are in the conference championship game and not a team that backed their way in

    Personally I'd rather see 16 teams and feed those last 2 G5 teams to the wolves against the top seeds, if applicable.  Much like what we see with every other NCAA sport.  A team like Boise last year would still be top 12 seed as well as they played last year, but a team like Tulane or JMU would be traveling to Indiana or Georgia and getting smoked.

    Remember that last year, tOSU was not even close to a top seed and won it all.  So going back to 4 teams isnt the right answer.  But I think we need to see a few more competitive games like we got with tamu/Miami and Bama/OU.  

    Also, JMU fought hard and covered the spread.  So good on them for staying in it even though they had 0 chance of winning

     

    Reply

    this is just the 2nd year of the CFP.  It was going to take time and rules changes to get to a better place.  If they are smart, they adjust with conference champs so that the G5 teams dont just get an auto bid because the ACC sucked yet again.  And if the ACC is smart, they give some leeway so their BEST teams are in the conference championship game and not a team that backed their way in

    Personally I'd rather see 16 teams and feed those last 2 G5 teams to the wolves against the top seeds, if applicable.  Much like what we see with every other NCAA sport.  A team like Boise last year would still be top 12 seed as well as they played last year, but a team like Tulane or JMU would be traveling to Indiana or Georgia and getting smoked.

    Remember that last year, tOSU was not even close to a top seed and won it all.  So going back to 4 teams isnt the right answer.  But I think we need to see a few more competitive games like we got with tamu/Miami and Bama/OU.  

    Also, JMU fought hard and covered the spread.  So good on them for staying in it even though they had 0 chance of winning

     

     
    Ravensfan2k3
    Ravensfan2k3
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 3405
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2025 - 10:10 AM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by monkeybutt:

    what could they be embarrassed about? jmu and tulane were not options. they were auto bids based on the rules set before the season started.
    exactly

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by monkeybutt:

    what could they be embarrassed about? jmu and tulane were not options. they were auto bids based on the rules set before the season started.
    exactly

     
     
    rosswin97
    rosswin97
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2023
    Posts: 3014
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2025 - 11:37 AM ET #25

    Well Oregon didn’t cover so…every year people say the smaller schools don’t belong because of a blowout but just last year we saw osu beat tenn 45-17 in CFP. A year before that we saw UGA beat TCU in the title game 65-7. There have been many lopsided games amongst the bigger named schools since the CFP has started, like a ton of them. Those things happen. Been seeing the same big name teams all my life so I ldont mind some fresh faces. There are like 130+ teams in FBS not fair to just limit a chance at a chip to 4 or 5 conferences.

    Reply

    Well Oregon didn’t cover so…every year people say the smaller schools don’t belong because of a blowout but just last year we saw osu beat tenn 45-17 in CFP. A year before that we saw UGA beat TCU in the title game 65-7. There have been many lopsided games amongst the bigger named schools since the CFP has started, like a ton of them. Those things happen. Been seeing the same big name teams all my life so I ldont mind some fresh faces. There are like 130+ teams in FBS not fair to just limit a chance at a chip to 4 or 5 conferences.

    All Forums | College Football

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 461,078
    • Tuesday 10/13/2026 710
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 274,326
    • PART DEUX 270
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,326
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 107,037
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 41,328
    • the whole problem is knowingly spreading false info to vulnerable people 21,263
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 32,876
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 21,729

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.