We get new life every week of the season. Gotta cherish the journey because there is no destination.....
Had a subpar week 4....but thats part of the process.....its ok to lose and be wrong.....because it HAS to be ok.....Why? Because is unavoidable....what you choose to do after the fact is what matters.....
28-24 YTD
5-4 Top 3
Getting the thread up....most lines have settled.....should have some plays up tomorrow at some point.
3
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
We get new life every week of the season. Gotta cherish the journey because there is no destination.....
Had a subpar week 4....but thats part of the process.....its ok to lose and be wrong.....because it HAS to be ok.....Why? Because is unavoidable....what you choose to do after the fact is what matters.....
28-24 YTD
5-4 Top 3
Getting the thread up....most lines have settled.....should have some plays up tomorrow at some point.
Agree 110 percent, nice thoughts , my first 3 weeks was really bad , but went 3-0 in week 4 and it’s not how U start , it’s how U finish that counts , let’s finish strong
0
@TRAIN69
Agree 110 percent, nice thoughts , my first 3 weeks was really bad , but went 3-0 in week 4 and it’s not how U start , it’s how U finish that counts , let’s finish strong
Hey Train, talk to me about Kentucky - South Carolina. I seldom play totals, but doesn't 46.5 seem rather high to you? In the last nine meetings the two teams have combined for over 40 points ONE TIME. I'd appreciate your ever so humble opinion.
0
Hey Train, talk to me about Kentucky - South Carolina. I seldom play totals, but doesn't 46.5 seem rather high to you? In the last nine meetings the two teams have combined for over 40 points ONE TIME. I'd appreciate your ever so humble opinion.
Hey Train, talk to me about Kentucky - South Carolina. I seldom play totals, but doesn't 46.5 seem rather high to you? In the last nine meetings the two teams have combined for over 40 points ONE TIME. I'd appreciate your ever so humble opinion.
Still mulling that one over. I lean under, but a 24-23 game makes it a loser...both defenses aren't as good as previous years....I do expect a lot of running though.....doubt this one makes the cut, but I'll keep an eye on it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Boisestateand8:
Hey Train, talk to me about Kentucky - South Carolina. I seldom play totals, but doesn't 46.5 seem rather high to you? In the last nine meetings the two teams have combined for over 40 points ONE TIME. I'd appreciate your ever so humble opinion.
Still mulling that one over. I lean under, but a 24-23 game makes it a loser...both defenses aren't as good as previous years....I do expect a lot of running though.....doubt this one makes the cut, but I'll keep an eye on it.
This Army line has just moved to +4....was looking at ECU...but I'm debating to go with Army...that triple option attack might give ECU defense fits...any thoughts?....
0
@TRAIN69
This Army line has just moved to +4....was looking at ECU...but I'm debating to go with Army...that triple option attack might give ECU defense fits...any thoughts?....
Nice call on Purdue last weekend, I went against you and lost by a measly point. Notre Dame defense leaves ALOT to be desired. They will be a good over team rest of the way if they don't get their defence figured out.
0
Nice call on Purdue last weekend, I went against you and lost by a measly point. Notre Dame defense leaves ALOT to be desired. They will be a good over team rest of the way if they don't get their defence figured out.
@TRAIN69 This Army line has just moved to +4....was looking at ECU...but I'm debating to go with Army...that triple option attack might give ECU defense fits...any thoughts?....
Very tough game to cap with limited data and a short week...ECU has played 2 decent teams and didn't fair well vs either.....Lean Army & over.....Probably O53 stronger of the 2.....
GL brother
0
Quote Originally Posted by lmb4321:
@TRAIN69 This Army line has just moved to +4....was looking at ECU...but I'm debating to go with Army...that triple option attack might give ECU defense fits...any thoughts?....
Very tough game to cap with limited data and a short week...ECU has played 2 decent teams and didn't fair well vs either.....Lean Army & over.....Probably O53 stronger of the 2.....
Nice call on Purdue last weekend, I went against you and lost by a measly point. Notre Dame defense leaves ALOT to be desired. They will be a good over team rest of the way if they don't get their defence figured out.
That game coulda went either way (spread wise)....I just got 1 extra bounce....
But I think we learned our lesson about going against me.....
JK! Good to see ya brother
0
Quote Originally Posted by icemantbi:
Nice call on Purdue last weekend, I went against you and lost by a measly point. Notre Dame defense leaves ALOT to be desired. They will be a good over team rest of the way if they don't get their defence figured out.
That game coulda went either way (spread wise)....I just got 1 extra bounce....
But I think we learned our lesson about going against me.....
That’s brave to take VT. We have seen a number of starters declare for the portal the past two weeks (they can go to portal right away after a head coach is fired during a season). NCSU defense is bad, but the VT pass defense is non existent and among the worst in the country for many categories. Just a caution for you and others.
Also, do you generally see more opportunities in week 5 as some teams start to play their first conference games?
0
@TRAIN69
That’s brave to take VT. We have seen a number of starters declare for the portal the past two weeks (they can go to portal right away after a head coach is fired during a season). NCSU defense is bad, but the VT pass defense is non existent and among the worst in the country for many categories. Just a caution for you and others.
Also, do you generally see more opportunities in week 5 as some teams start to play their first conference games?
@TRAIN69 That’s brave to take VT. We have seen a number of starters declare for the portal the past two weeks (they can go to portal right away after a head coach is fired during a season). NCSU defense is bad, but the VT pass defense is non existent and among the worst in the country for many categories. Just a caution for you and others. Also, do you generally see more opportunities in week 5 as some teams start to play their first conference games?
Yes sir, I'm aware of the VT transfers.....but that just means guys are gonna step in hungry.....nothing crazy, ai just like the spot/set up here.
Week 5-8 is where you can still find teams who aren't "valued" properly.....which helps for the UDMLP and regular plays.....for example....the LSU defense is getting more credit than they deserve for beating Clemson and Florida......that has overshadowed the fact their offense isn't clicking (scored 17,23,20 vs only 3 real opponents).....of course they can win at Ole Miss....but I'm betting their offensive woes are real and their defense isn't as good as most think.....
2
Quote Originally Posted by hokieal:
@TRAIN69 That’s brave to take VT. We have seen a number of starters declare for the portal the past two weeks (they can go to portal right away after a head coach is fired during a season). NCSU defense is bad, but the VT pass defense is non existent and among the worst in the country for many categories. Just a caution for you and others. Also, do you generally see more opportunities in week 5 as some teams start to play their first conference games?
Yes sir, I'm aware of the VT transfers.....but that just means guys are gonna step in hungry.....nothing crazy, ai just like the spot/set up here.
Week 5-8 is where you can still find teams who aren't "valued" properly.....which helps for the UDMLP and regular plays.....for example....the LSU defense is getting more credit than they deserve for beating Clemson and Florida......that has overshadowed the fact their offense isn't clicking (scored 17,23,20 vs only 3 real opponents).....of course they can win at Ole Miss....but I'm betting their offensive woes are real and their defense isn't as good as most think.....
@TRAIN69 Agree 110 percent, nice thoughts , my first 3 weeks was really bad , but went 3-0 in week 4 and it’s not how U start , it’s how U finish that counts , let’s finish strong
0
Quote Originally Posted by ULLafayettekid:
@TRAIN69 Agree 110 percent, nice thoughts , my first 3 weeks was really bad , but went 3-0 in week 4 and it’s not how U start , it’s how U finish that counts , let’s finish strong
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.