I was on Boise +4 myself but i saw it drop to 2.5 and couldnt help myself… I took Oregon St for the chance to middle it. Either im a genius or im chicken-shit BOL bro
0
I was on Boise +4 myself but i saw it drop to 2.5 and couldnt help myself… I took Oregon St for the chance to middle it. Either im a genius or im chicken-shit BOL bro
Love the Under on Vols now that I look at last year's results.....they tended to keep teams ranked around 90 - 130th to a minimum of 14 pts or less, when they played at home.
I also noticed they rarely ran the score up over 45....lets say they run it to 52, this total should still be good
Nice find Duck
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Love the Under on Vols now that I look at last year's results.....they tended to keep teams ranked around 90 - 130th to a minimum of 14 pts or less, when they played at home.
I also noticed they rarely ran the score up over 45....lets say they run it to 52, this total should still be good
I don’t see how the buffs will cover the TCU receivers. Thinking they score early and often…but the sonny dykes factor has to be at play as well (no D…constant risk taking even when unnecessary) could se this being 42-20… or 38-31
Until the wallet is full.
0
@TRAIN69
I don’t see how the buffs will cover the TCU receivers. Thinking they score early and often…but the sonny dykes factor has to be at play as well (no D…constant risk taking even when unnecessary) could se this being 42-20… or 38-31
Thanks for the great plays and hope you have a good year. Looks like all the lines changed bigtime from a few hours ago. Just curious, are you buying points on most of these and adjusting lines to what you feel is best.
Texas State is a pick currently.
Thanks
0
@steponaduck
Hey Mr. Duck,
Thanks for the great plays and hope you have a good year. Looks like all the lines changed bigtime from a few hours ago. Just curious, are you buying points on most of these and adjusting lines to what you feel is best.
Once all the real books add a line for holy cross + Merrimack I would pounce on the cruisaiders. currently seeing HC +17.5. Outrageous line
Duck,
I believe they meant to list Holy Cross as -17.5 favorites. There are a few others that the line is about right for magnitude, just wrong team favored.
0
Quote Originally Posted by steponaduck:
Once all the real books add a line for holy cross + Merrimack I would pounce on the cruisaiders. currently seeing HC +17.5. Outrageous line
Duck,
I believe they meant to list Holy Cross as -17.5 favorites. There are a few others that the line is about right for magnitude, just wrong team favored.
Quote Originally Posted by steponaduck: Once all the real books add a line for holy cross + Merrimack I would pounce on the cruisaiders. currently seeing HC +17.5. Outrageous line Duck, I believe they meant to list Holy Cross as -17.5 favorites. There are a few others that the line is about right for magnitude, just wrong team favored.
of course that is the case, likely.
maybe the others will follow 5D blindly since they know nothing about patriot league FB, like you and I do?
Maybe they are asleep at the wheel?
Until the wallet is full.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TD21:
Quote Originally Posted by steponaduck: Once all the real books add a line for holy cross + Merrimack I would pounce on the cruisaiders. currently seeing HC +17.5. Outrageous line Duck, I believe they meant to list Holy Cross as -17.5 favorites. There are a few others that the line is about right for magnitude, just wrong team favored.
of course that is the case, likely.
maybe the others will follow 5D blindly since they know nothing about patriot league FB, like you and I do?
Regarding Kent state and Washington, I think UW wants to “get right” on offense early and often in this game. A potent offense is something that has been missing at Washington for quite some time. Now with an offensive minded head coach, penix at QBs, more continuity in the trenches…this could get ugly.
kent state allowed 500 yds to TExas a&m and MD last year. Those offenses blew scoring chances time and time again. Still got to 51 and 53 combined total.
no reason Washington doesn’t hang 42-49 on the flashes and their Swiss cheese defense. Maybe Kent makes a game if this before getting pounded @ OU and @UGA before mac play?
wouldn’t be surprised to see them with 20+ points…
I would assume Washington is extremely motivated to give their supporters some offensive fireworks and this is the perfect team to do that against.
Until the wallet is full.
0
Regarding Kent state and Washington, I think UW wants to “get right” on offense early and often in this game. A potent offense is something that has been missing at Washington for quite some time. Now with an offensive minded head coach, penix at QBs, more continuity in the trenches…this could get ugly.
kent state allowed 500 yds to TExas a&m and MD last year. Those offenses blew scoring chances time and time again. Still got to 51 and 53 combined total.
no reason Washington doesn’t hang 42-49 on the flashes and their Swiss cheese defense. Maybe Kent makes a game if this before getting pounded @ OU and @UGA before mac play?
wouldn’t be surprised to see them with 20+ points…
I would assume Washington is extremely motivated to give their supporters some offensive fireworks and this is the perfect team to do that against.
They were relatively close last week. But no errors last week on who should be favored, just double checked a screen shot.
only problem with betting if/when they do blindly follow, is your bet likely will be canceled for a line error and then they also flag you as a troublemaker/ cut your max wager amounts, etc.. of course they might do that anyway if you win too much with legit lines.
anyway, I know you know the drill. Just replying for others out there - give them something to think about I guess.
0
@steponaduck
They were relatively close last week. But no errors last week on who should be favored, just double checked a screen shot.
only problem with betting if/when they do blindly follow, is your bet likely will be canceled for a line error and then they also flag you as a troublemaker/ cut your max wager amounts, etc.. of course they might do that anyway if you win too much with legit lines.
anyway, I know you know the drill. Just replying for others out there - give them something to think about I guess.
Should be noted these lines would have had to been locked in a long time ago but all these lines have moved in favor of you .. early weeks smart to take points ..
@TRAIN69
i personally think Colorado +13.5 is the play altitude first game will be big factor along with tcu’s uncertainty qb carousel .. dykes is a step down in coaching from Patterson .. see if tcu’s defense is legit but Colorado should keep it within 13 .. what do I know.. maybe I’ll throw out my leans on a thread and go from there for plays
0
Should be noted these lines would have had to been locked in a long time ago but all these lines have moved in favor of you .. early weeks smart to take points ..
@TRAIN69
i personally think Colorado +13.5 is the play altitude first game will be big factor along with tcu’s uncertainty qb carousel .. dykes is a step down in coaching from Patterson .. see if tcu’s defense is legit but Colorado should keep it within 13 .. what do I know.. maybe I’ll throw out my leans on a thread and go from there for plays
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.