So far this week I am 4-0 winning on Bears Over, Bears +8, Toledo over and Northern Illinois Under 67.5. If you have seen my previous picks you would know that I often bet against what the public is taking....because KNOWS ALL. Temple is favored by 13 or 13.5 depending on where you're at and this line has already gone up by a half point from where it opened. Odd thing about this line movement is that ONLY 53% of the public is on Temple. I believe Vegas wants action on Ohio, which is the cause of the line movement. Temple has been playing terrible as of late while Miami Ohio has been playing descent ball. This is a Temple line.
As for the Over/Under 44. Public is pounding the over and this line has gone up by 1.5 already. I will be waiting to make a play on the total depending on the line movement. If the line goes down near game time I will be taking the under. 44 isn't that many points which scares me, but in these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often.
So far this week I am 4-0 winning on Bears Over, Bears +8, Toledo over and Northern Illinois Under 67.5. If you have seen my previous picks you would know that I often bet against what the public is taking....because KNOWS ALL. Temple is favored by 13 or 13.5 depending on where you're at and this line has already gone up by a half point from where it opened. Odd thing about this line movement is that ONLY 53% of the public is on Temple. I believe Vegas wants action on Ohio, which is the cause of the line movement. Temple has been playing terrible as of late while Miami Ohio has been playing descent ball. This is a Temple line.
As for the Over/Under 44. Public is pounding the over and this line has gone up by 1.5 already. I will be waiting to make a play on the total depending on the line movement. If the line goes down near game time I will be taking the under. 44 isn't that many points which scares me, but in these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often.
Love the under especially after everyone saw temple in a shootout last week with ohio, and miami-Ohio putting up 35 on the Zips. Feel like this one is going to have alot of running the ball and punts. As for the spread, I think temple may cover but I'm not willing to put anything on it. Feels like a 24-10 type game to me.
Love the under especially after everyone saw temple in a shootout last week with ohio, and miami-Ohio putting up 35 on the Zips. Feel like this one is going to have alot of running the ball and punts. As for the spread, I think temple may cover but I'm not willing to put anything on it. Feels like a 24-10 type game to me.
"In these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often" ??? Which MAC games have you been watching. With that being said I would lean under in this one. Temple plays much better defense at home than on the road. If Temple us to cover this spread than the game goes over. If it goes over than Temple wont cover
"In these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often" ??? Which MAC games have you been watching. With that being said I would lean under in this one. Temple plays much better defense at home than on the road. If Temple us to cover this spread than the game goes over. If it goes over than Temple wont cover
"In these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often" ??? Which MAC games have you been watching. With that being said I would lean under in this one. Temple plays much better defense at home than on the road. If Temple us to cover this spread than the game goes over. If it goes over than Temple wont cover
Agreed, Masonator. Temple won't cover. Game stays pretty close to total. But no a sure bets Wednesday in the MAC.
"In these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often" ??? Which MAC games have you been watching. With that being said I would lean under in this one. Temple plays much better defense at home than on the road. If Temple us to cover this spread than the game goes over. If it goes over than Temple wont cover
Agreed, Masonator. Temple won't cover. Game stays pretty close to total. But no a sure bets Wednesday in the MAC.
So far this week I am 4-0 winning on Bears Over, Bears +8, Toledo over and Northern Illinois Under 67.5. If you have seen my previous picks you would know that I often bet against what the public is taking....because KNOWS ALL. Temple is favored by 13 or 13.5 depending on where you're at and this line has already gone up by a half point from where it opened. Odd thing about this line movement is that ONLY 53% of the public is on Temple. I believe Vegas wants action on Ohio, which is the cause of the line movement. Temple has been playing terrible as of late while Miami Ohio has been playing descent ball. This is a Temple line.
As for the Over/Under 44. Public is pounding the over and this line has gone up by 1.5 already. I will be waiting to make a play on the total depending on the line movement. If the line goes down near game time I will be taking the under. 44 isn't that many points which scares me, but in these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often.
Let me know some of your thoughts on this game.
According to your logic "Vegas" wanted No iLL action last night, how did that turn out.
So far this week I am 4-0 winning on Bears Over, Bears +8, Toledo over and Northern Illinois Under 67.5. If you have seen my previous picks you would know that I often bet against what the public is taking....because KNOWS ALL. Temple is favored by 13 or 13.5 depending on where you're at and this line has already gone up by a half point from where it opened. Odd thing about this line movement is that ONLY 53% of the public is on Temple. I believe Vegas wants action on Ohio, which is the cause of the line movement. Temple has been playing terrible as of late while Miami Ohio has been playing descent ball. This is a Temple line.
As for the Over/Under 44. Public is pounding the over and this line has gone up by 1.5 already. I will be waiting to make a play on the total depending on the line movement. If the line goes down near game time I will be taking the under. 44 isn't that many points which scares me, but in these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often.
Let me know some of your thoughts on this game.
According to your logic "Vegas" wanted No iLL action last night, how did that turn out.
THE WAY THE MAC TEAMS ARE PLAYING ...I WOULDN'T TAKE A RISK ON UNDER UNLESS YOU'RE VERY CONFIDENT IN THE PLAY. SHIT OVER ALWAYS HAVE A CHANCE EVEN IF ITS 0-0 AT HALFTIME. THE WAY THESE CRAPPY MAC TEAMS PLAY DEFENSE OVER IS ALWAYS A LIVE BET
THE WAY THE MAC TEAMS ARE PLAYING ...I WOULDN'T TAKE A RISK ON UNDER UNLESS YOU'RE VERY CONFIDENT IN THE PLAY. SHIT OVER ALWAYS HAVE A CHANCE EVEN IF ITS 0-0 AT HALFTIME. THE WAY THESE CRAPPY MAC TEAMS PLAY DEFENSE OVER IS ALWAYS A LIVE BET
[Quote: but in these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often.
[/Quote]
If that's your thinking, I'd stay away from this game because you're obviously not familiar with these MAC games.
Another fairytail logic is the whole "which way vegas wants you to bet". Sure, some lines are set or move in a way where books might want some action to go one way or another, but to base you plays on that is insane because it doesn't effect the outcome of the game (unless you believe in the conspiracy theories).
Just my 2 cents.....I also believe these high lines are sometimes thrown out there to make me think the way you're thinking and overthink these games. Wow...Temples favored by 13 after losing to Ohio and Bowling Green....the same Bowling Green that couldn't score last night on Northern Illinois non existent defense? AND the lines going up....must make Temple the play since it makes no sense, right?
Anyways...BOL tonight....I'm on the Redhawks +13 and the ML
[Quote: but in these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often.
[/Quote]
If that's your thinking, I'd stay away from this game because you're obviously not familiar with these MAC games.
Another fairytail logic is the whole "which way vegas wants you to bet". Sure, some lines are set or move in a way where books might want some action to go one way or another, but to base you plays on that is insane because it doesn't effect the outcome of the game (unless you believe in the conspiracy theories).
Just my 2 cents.....I also believe these high lines are sometimes thrown out there to make me think the way you're thinking and overthink these games. Wow...Temples favored by 13 after losing to Ohio and Bowling Green....the same Bowling Green that couldn't score last night on Northern Illinois non existent defense? AND the lines going up....must make Temple the play since it makes no sense, right?
Anyways...BOL tonight....I'm on the Redhawks +13 and the ML
"In these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often" ??? Which MAC games have you been watching. With that being said I would lean under in this one. Temple plays much better defense at home than on the road. If Temple us to cover this spread than the game goes over. If it goes over than Temple wont cover
This statement doesn't make sense but I think I understand what you were trying to say. This has always been the type of logic I've used as well when trying to get a feel for the outcome of a game regarding the total. If Temple covers it would most likely stay under the total, with the logic that MIA-OH having trouble scoring and holding up their end of the deal. Somewhat of a blowout, in the area of 31-10 or 28-14 type of game (staying under). On the other hand, I'm always of the mind set that if the dog is gonna stay within a larger # it would usually mean that they were able to put up a good amount of points and push the total over.
With that being said, I'll most likely be on the dog and the over tonight
"In these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often" ??? Which MAC games have you been watching. With that being said I would lean under in this one. Temple plays much better defense at home than on the road. If Temple us to cover this spread than the game goes over. If it goes over than Temple wont cover
This statement doesn't make sense but I think I understand what you were trying to say. This has always been the type of logic I've used as well when trying to get a feel for the outcome of a game regarding the total. If Temple covers it would most likely stay under the total, with the logic that MIA-OH having trouble scoring and holding up their end of the deal. Somewhat of a blowout, in the area of 31-10 or 28-14 type of game (staying under). On the other hand, I'm always of the mind set that if the dog is gonna stay within a larger # it would usually mean that they were able to put up a good amount of points and push the total over.
With that being said, I'll most likely be on the dog and the over tonight
If that's your thinking, I'd stay away from this game because you're obviously not familiar with these MAC games.
Another fairytail logic is the whole "which way vegas wants you to bet". Sure, some lines are set or move in a way where books might want some action to go one way or another, but to base you plays on that is insane because it doesn't effect the outcome of the game (unless you believe in the conspiracy theories).
Just my 2 cents.....I also believe these high lines are sometimes thrown out there to make me think the way you're thinking and overthink these games. Wow...Temples favored by 13 after losing to Ohio and Bowling Green....the same Bowling Green that couldn't score last night on Northern Illinois non existent defense? AND the lines going up....must make Temple the play since it makes no sense, right?
Anyways...BOL tonight....I'm on the Redhawks +13 and the ML
BEST LOGICAL STATEMENT I'VE READ IN THIS FORUM! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK PHANTOM!!
If that's your thinking, I'd stay away from this game because you're obviously not familiar with these MAC games.
Another fairytail logic is the whole "which way vegas wants you to bet". Sure, some lines are set or move in a way where books might want some action to go one way or another, but to base you plays on that is insane because it doesn't effect the outcome of the game (unless you believe in the conspiracy theories).
Just my 2 cents.....I also believe these high lines are sometimes thrown out there to make me think the way you're thinking and overthink these games. Wow...Temples favored by 13 after losing to Ohio and Bowling Green....the same Bowling Green that couldn't score last night on Northern Illinois non existent defense? AND the lines going up....must make Temple the play since it makes no sense, right?
Anyways...BOL tonight....I'm on the Redhawks +13 and the ML
BEST LOGICAL STATEMENT I'VE READ IN THIS FORUM! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK PHANTOM!!
Ill revise what I say...Yes the MAC do score often but I meant in these type of games such as the Temples of the conference and the Zips...Obviously Toledo and these no defensive teams let up points left and right. This game will be defensive with many punts.
Ill revise what I say...Yes the MAC do score often but I meant in these type of games such as the Temples of the conference and the Zips...Obviously Toledo and these no defensive teams let up points left and right. This game will be defensive with many punts.
If that's your thinking, I'd stay away from this game because you're obviously not familiar with these MAC games.
Another fairytail logic is the whole "which way vegas wants you to bet". Sure, some lines are set or move in a way where books might want some action to go one way or another, but to base you plays on that is insane because it doesn't effect the outcome of the game (unless you believe in the conspiracy theories).
Just my 2 cents.....I also believe these high lines are sometimes thrown out there to make me think the way you're thinking and overthink these games. Wow...Temples favored by 13 after losing to Ohio and Bowling Green....the same Bowling Green that couldn't score last night on Northern Illinois non existent defense? AND the lines going up....must make Temple the play since it makes no sense, right?
Anyways...BOL tonight....I'm on the Redhawks +13 and the ML
70% is on Miami Ohio...THe public is taking the points...it seems to easy to take the team getting nearly 2 tds.
If that's your thinking, I'd stay away from this game because you're obviously not familiar with these MAC games.
Another fairytail logic is the whole "which way vegas wants you to bet". Sure, some lines are set or move in a way where books might want some action to go one way or another, but to base you plays on that is insane because it doesn't effect the outcome of the game (unless you believe in the conspiracy theories).
Just my 2 cents.....I also believe these high lines are sometimes thrown out there to make me think the way you're thinking and overthink these games. Wow...Temples favored by 13 after losing to Ohio and Bowling Green....the same Bowling Green that couldn't score last night on Northern Illinois non existent defense? AND the lines going up....must make Temple the play since it makes no sense, right?
Anyways...BOL tonight....I'm on the Redhawks +13 and the ML
70% is on Miami Ohio...THe public is taking the points...it seems to easy to take the team getting nearly 2 tds.
70% is on Miami Ohio...THe public is taking the points...it seems to easy to take the team getting nearly 2 tds.
Wow where do you see 70% on Miami. I see no worse than a split. If indeed you see 70% and the line is going up to 13 1/2 from 12 then obviously big money is on Temple. Public percentages mean nothing unless your gonna corralate (sp) this with line movement and sharp money (heavy Money). Dont know where youd find that info and base a bet on just a whim that 70% of the public is on Miami is makin no sense but GL.
70% is on Miami Ohio...THe public is taking the points...it seems to easy to take the team getting nearly 2 tds.
Wow where do you see 70% on Miami. I see no worse than a split. If indeed you see 70% and the line is going up to 13 1/2 from 12 then obviously big money is on Temple. Public percentages mean nothing unless your gonna corralate (sp) this with line movement and sharp money (heavy Money). Dont know where youd find that info and base a bet on just a whim that 70% of the public is on Miami is makin no sense but GL.
"In these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often" ??? Which MAC games have you been watching. With that being said I would lean under in this one. Temple plays much better defense at home than on the road. If Temple us to cover this spread than the game goes over. If it goes over than Temple wont cover
WHAT ARE U TALKING ABOUT?
IF TEMPLE IS TO COVER THIS SPREAD THAN THE GAME GOES OVER...U STATED.....IF IT GOES OVER THEN TEMPLE WONT COVER........DO U READ YUR POSTS BEFORE U POST?
"In these MAC games scoring doesn't come too often" ??? Which MAC games have you been watching. With that being said I would lean under in this one. Temple plays much better defense at home than on the road. If Temple us to cover this spread than the game goes over. If it goes over than Temple wont cover
WHAT ARE U TALKING ABOUT?
IF TEMPLE IS TO COVER THIS SPREAD THAN THE GAME GOES OVER...U STATED.....IF IT GOES OVER THEN TEMPLE WONT COVER........DO U READ YUR POSTS BEFORE U POST?
this guy knows absolutely NOTHING about the MAC!!!!!...his comments and %'s are way off base.....dont know where he gets his figures and facts....but ...i would strongly recommend not even thinking about following this clown!!!!
this guy knows absolutely NOTHING about the MAC!!!!!...his comments and %'s are way off base.....dont know where he gets his figures and facts....but ...i would strongly recommend not even thinking about following this clown!!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.