the NCAA has opened pandoras box. there is no punishment for soliciting services or asking for any kind of extra benefits. every uncle, brother, minister, father, aau coach of every division 1 athlete should be on the phone asking for money right now. if the "kid doesnt know", then there is no punishment.
the NCAA has opened pandoras box. there is no punishment for soliciting services or asking for any kind of extra benefits. every uncle, brother, minister, father, aau coach of every division 1 athlete should be on the phone asking for money right now. if the "kid doesnt know", then there is no punishment.
IN AMERICAN, SINCE WHEN DO WE PUNISH THE SON FOR THE SINS OF THE FATHER ......... IF THAT WAS THE CASE I BEEN JAIL RIGHT NOW!! LOL
AND ON THAT NOTE ..........WOOOOHOOO LETS DO THE COVER DANCE GO CAM ITS YOUR BIRTHDAY LETS GET THE COVER BY DOUBLE DIGITS!!!! WOOHOO
CAM FOR PRESIDENT CAM FOR VICE PRESIDENT .. CAM TO BANG SARAH PALIN VIDEO ON YOU TUBE!!! WOOOOHOOO
THIS IS THE BEST NEWS IVE HEARD SINCE ALMOST AS GOOD AS WHEN MY WIFE SAID SHE WAS LEAVING
IN AMERICAN, SINCE WHEN DO WE PUNISH THE SON FOR THE SINS OF THE FATHER ......... IF THAT WAS THE CASE I BEEN JAIL RIGHT NOW!! LOL
AND ON THAT NOTE ..........WOOOOHOOO LETS DO THE COVER DANCE GO CAM ITS YOUR BIRTHDAY LETS GET THE COVER BY DOUBLE DIGITS!!!! WOOHOO
CAM FOR PRESIDENT CAM FOR VICE PRESIDENT .. CAM TO BANG SARAH PALIN VIDEO ON YOU TUBE!!! WOOOOHOOO
THIS IS THE BEST NEWS IVE HEARD SINCE ALMOST AS GOOD AS WHEN MY WIFE SAID SHE WAS LEAVING
the NCAA has opened pandoras box. there is no punishment for soliciting services or asking for any kind of extra benefits. every uncle, brother, minister, father, aau coach of every division 1 athlete should be on the phone asking for money right now. if the "kid doesnt know", then there is no punishment.
the NCAA has opened pandoras box. there is no punishment for soliciting services or asking for any kind of extra benefits. every uncle, brother, minister, father, aau coach of every division 1 athlete should be on the phone asking for money right now. if the "kid doesnt know", then there is no punishment.
The Associated Press
INDIANAPOLIS — The NCAA says Auburn quarterback Cam Newton's father did indeed shop his son to another school, but ruled the Heisman Trophy front-runner is eligible to play in the Southeastern Conference championship game.
The NCAA released its finding in a statement on Wednesday. The college sports governing body had concluded on Monday that a violation of Newton's amateur status had occurred. Auburn quietly declared Newton ineligible on Tuesday and requested his eligibility be reinstated.
Newton now has been cleared to compete without conditions, after weeks of questions about whether he would be allowed to continue playing.
"Based on the information available to the reinstatement staff at this time, we do not have sufficient evidence that Cam Newton or anyone from Auburn was aware of this activity, which led to his reinstatement," Kevin Lennon, NCAA vice president for academic and membership affairs, said in a news release.
"From a student-athlete reinstatement perspective, Auburn University met its obligation under NCAA bylaw 14.11.1. Under this threshold, the student-athlete has not participated while ineligible."
No. 2 Auburn plays South Carolina in the Southeastern Conference championship game on Saturday. With a victory, the unbeaten Tigers will earn a spot in the BCS national title game.
The NCAA won't say its case is closed on Newton. However, its statement notes that reinstatement likely occurs "prior to the close of an investigation."
The NCAA said Auburn and NCAA enforcement staff agreed that Newton's father and an owner of a scouting service worked together to on a pay-for-play scam.
Two Mississippi State boosters have accused Cecil Newton and former Mississippi State player Kenny Rogers of trying to get cash payments for Cam Newton to play for the Bulldogs while he was being recruited out of junior college last year.
The NCAA ruling does not mention Rogers by name, although it does note that Mississippi State has disassociated itself with the "involved individual."
Auburn also has agreed to limit Cecil Newton's access to its athletic program.
"The conduct of Cam Newton's father and the involved individual is unacceptable and has no place in the SEC or in intercollegiate athletics," said Mike Slive, Southeastern Conference Commissioner. "The actions taken by Auburn University and Mississippi State University make it clear this behavior will not be tolerated in the SEC."
Newton, who started his career at Florida, chose Auburn over Mississippi State after one season in junior college. He has been spectacular this year, leading Auburn to a 12-0 season.
"We are pleased that the NCAA has agreed with our position that Cam Newton has been and continues to be eligible to play football at Auburn University," Auburn athletic director Jay Jacobs said in the NCAA's statement. "We appreciate the diligence and professionalism of the NCAA and its handling of this matter."
___
December 01, 2010 02:25 PM EST
Copyright 2010, The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
https://www.ajc.com/sports/ncaa-rules-newton-eligible-761698.html
The Associated Press
INDIANAPOLIS — The NCAA says Auburn quarterback Cam Newton's father did indeed shop his son to another school, but ruled the Heisman Trophy front-runner is eligible to play in the Southeastern Conference championship game.
The NCAA released its finding in a statement on Wednesday. The college sports governing body had concluded on Monday that a violation of Newton's amateur status had occurred. Auburn quietly declared Newton ineligible on Tuesday and requested his eligibility be reinstated.
Newton now has been cleared to compete without conditions, after weeks of questions about whether he would be allowed to continue playing.
"Based on the information available to the reinstatement staff at this time, we do not have sufficient evidence that Cam Newton or anyone from Auburn was aware of this activity, which led to his reinstatement," Kevin Lennon, NCAA vice president for academic and membership affairs, said in a news release.
"From a student-athlete reinstatement perspective, Auburn University met its obligation under NCAA bylaw 14.11.1. Under this threshold, the student-athlete has not participated while ineligible."
No. 2 Auburn plays South Carolina in the Southeastern Conference championship game on Saturday. With a victory, the unbeaten Tigers will earn a spot in the BCS national title game.
The NCAA won't say its case is closed on Newton. However, its statement notes that reinstatement likely occurs "prior to the close of an investigation."
The NCAA said Auburn and NCAA enforcement staff agreed that Newton's father and an owner of a scouting service worked together to on a pay-for-play scam.
Two Mississippi State boosters have accused Cecil Newton and former Mississippi State player Kenny Rogers of trying to get cash payments for Cam Newton to play for the Bulldogs while he was being recruited out of junior college last year.
The NCAA ruling does not mention Rogers by name, although it does note that Mississippi State has disassociated itself with the "involved individual."
Auburn also has agreed to limit Cecil Newton's access to its athletic program.
"The conduct of Cam Newton's father and the involved individual is unacceptable and has no place in the SEC or in intercollegiate athletics," said Mike Slive, Southeastern Conference Commissioner. "The actions taken by Auburn University and Mississippi State University make it clear this behavior will not be tolerated in the SEC."
Newton, who started his career at Florida, chose Auburn over Mississippi State after one season in junior college. He has been spectacular this year, leading Auburn to a 12-0 season.
"We are pleased that the NCAA has agreed with our position that Cam Newton has been and continues to be eligible to play football at Auburn University," Auburn athletic director Jay Jacobs said in the NCAA's statement. "We appreciate the diligence and professionalism of the NCAA and its handling of this matter."
___
December 01, 2010 02:25 PM EST
Copyright 2010, The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
https://www.ajc.com/sports/ncaa-rules-newton-eligible-761698.html
the NCAA has opened pandoras box. there is no punishment for soliciting services or asking for any kind of extra benefits. every uncle, brother, minister, father, aau coach of every division 1 athlete should be on the phone asking for money right now. if the "kid doesnt know", then there is no punishment.
yea u arent understanding this right. first of all, the investigation isnt over. second, this ruling was based on Cecil Newtons contact with MSU and not Auburn. There has still been ZERO proof any wrongdoing occured between the Newtons and Auburn. Solicitation at another school where no commitment was ever made, and the people Cecil Newton(ONLY) spoke with about a possible pay-to-play deal are saying NO MONEY ever exhanged hands is not cause for Auburn or Cam Newton to be in jeoprady. The ONLY thing left to threaten either is whether evidence can be brought forth showing that Auburn offered money to Cecil Newton or the Newton family, a claim THAT NOBODY HAS MADE SINCE THIS STORY BROKE. everything that has been said over the past month was only regarding MSU, and i really dont think the NCAA/FBI/SEC will find any wrongdoing on Auburns behalf. Again, i must stress, that NOBODY has even made a claim that Auburn did anything wrong, nor has there been any proof of it.
the NCAA has opened pandoras box. there is no punishment for soliciting services or asking for any kind of extra benefits. every uncle, brother, minister, father, aau coach of every division 1 athlete should be on the phone asking for money right now. if the "kid doesnt know", then there is no punishment.
yea u arent understanding this right. first of all, the investigation isnt over. second, this ruling was based on Cecil Newtons contact with MSU and not Auburn. There has still been ZERO proof any wrongdoing occured between the Newtons and Auburn. Solicitation at another school where no commitment was ever made, and the people Cecil Newton(ONLY) spoke with about a possible pay-to-play deal are saying NO MONEY ever exhanged hands is not cause for Auburn or Cam Newton to be in jeoprady. The ONLY thing left to threaten either is whether evidence can be brought forth showing that Auburn offered money to Cecil Newton or the Newton family, a claim THAT NOBODY HAS MADE SINCE THIS STORY BROKE. everything that has been said over the past month was only regarding MSU, and i really dont think the NCAA/FBI/SEC will find any wrongdoing on Auburns behalf. Again, i must stress, that NOBODY has even made a claim that Auburn did anything wrong, nor has there been any proof of it.
it doesnt matter if it ever exchanged hands or not. NCAA rules state that you cant solicit services. it is fact that cam's father did so. and the punishment is......
dont get me wrong, im not against cam on this. im all for athlete rights. i think they should be represented, i think they should be able to have agents and i think they should be paid to a certain extent.
my point is in reference to the NCAA rulebook. you cannot solicit services. the ruling to allow cam to play is saying that there is no punishment for doing so. the NCAA had a chance to make an example here. by not doing so, they are opening up the possibility for any middle man to solicit services to a school without any type of repercution as long as the athlete "doesnt know". thats all im trying to point out.
it doesnt matter if it ever exchanged hands or not. NCAA rules state that you cant solicit services. it is fact that cam's father did so. and the punishment is......
dont get me wrong, im not against cam on this. im all for athlete rights. i think they should be represented, i think they should be able to have agents and i think they should be paid to a certain extent.
my point is in reference to the NCAA rulebook. you cannot solicit services. the ruling to allow cam to play is saying that there is no punishment for doing so. the NCAA had a chance to make an example here. by not doing so, they are opening up the possibility for any middle man to solicit services to a school without any type of repercution as long as the athlete "doesnt know". thats all im trying to point out.
it doesnt matter if it ever exchanged hands or not. NCAA rules state that you cant solicit services. it is fact that cam's father did so. and the punishment is......
dont get me wrong, im not against cam on this. im all for athlete rights. i think they should be represented, i think they should be able to have agents and i think they should be paid to a certain extent.
my point is in reference to the NCAA rulebook. you cannot solicit services. the ruling to allow cam to play is saying that there is no punishment for doing so. the NCAA had a chance to make an example here. by not doing so, they are opening up the possibility for any middle man to solicit services to a school without any type of repercution as long as the athlete "doesnt know". thats all im trying to point out.
you are missing the fine print...
If Cam was playing at MSU right now, hed probably be ruled ineligible and it would stay that way-----although i dont think this fuckface Rogers would have said anything in the first place. the difference is that hes playing at Auburn, and no wrongdoing by the Newtons or AUBURN has even been claimed to have taken place, much less proven, like i said above. that is the key difference here.
it doesnt matter if it ever exchanged hands or not. NCAA rules state that you cant solicit services. it is fact that cam's father did so. and the punishment is......
dont get me wrong, im not against cam on this. im all for athlete rights. i think they should be represented, i think they should be able to have agents and i think they should be paid to a certain extent.
my point is in reference to the NCAA rulebook. you cannot solicit services. the ruling to allow cam to play is saying that there is no punishment for doing so. the NCAA had a chance to make an example here. by not doing so, they are opening up the possibility for any middle man to solicit services to a school without any type of repercution as long as the athlete "doesnt know". thats all im trying to point out.
you are missing the fine print...
If Cam was playing at MSU right now, hed probably be ruled ineligible and it would stay that way-----although i dont think this fuckface Rogers would have said anything in the first place. the difference is that hes playing at Auburn, and no wrongdoing by the Newtons or AUBURN has even been claimed to have taken place, much less proven, like i said above. that is the key difference here.
The only thing that pisses me off more than him playing for Auburn in the SEC title game is that LSU didn't find a way to come up with more money. If I had my way, there'd be a purple and gold, Rio-style, Christ the Redeemer statue in front of the Holy Zion Center of Deliverance in Newnan, Georgia. When you can't pay more than Mississippi State and Auburn, you're just not in the big time anymore. I think we should get Zach Mettenbacher's dad a tiger-striped Escalade, pronto.
The only thing that pisses me off more than him playing for Auburn in the SEC title game is that LSU didn't find a way to come up with more money. If I had my way, there'd be a purple and gold, Rio-style, Christ the Redeemer statue in front of the Holy Zion Center of Deliverance in Newnan, Georgia. When you can't pay more than Mississippi State and Auburn, you're just not in the big time anymore. I think we should get Zach Mettenbacher's dad a tiger-striped Escalade, pronto.
yea u arent understanding this right. first of all, the investigation isnt over. second, this ruling was based on Cecil Newtons contact with MSU and not Auburn. There has still been ZERO proof any wrongdoing occured between the Newtons and Auburn. Solicitation at another school where no commitment was ever made, and the people Cecil Newton(ONLY) spoke with about a possible pay-to-play deal are saying NO MONEY ever exhanged hands is not cause for Auburn or Cam Newton to be in jeoprady. The ONLY thing left to threaten either is whether evidence can be brought forth showing that Auburn offered money to Cecil Newton or the Newton family, a claim THAT NOBODY HAS MADE SINCE THIS STORY BROKE. everything that has been said over the past month was only regarding MSU, and i really dont think the NCAA/FBI/SEC will find any wrongdoing on Auburns behalf. Again, i must stress, that NOBODY has even made a claim that Auburn did anything wrong, nor has there been any proof of it.
it doesnt matter what happened between cam and auburn. cam's father solicited his son to MSU. they didnt get the money, so he moves on to auburn. i dont care if any money every exchanged hands. by not punishing cam, the ncaa is opening up a can or worms imo. whats to keep the next guy's father from soliciting his son to college A, then college B, then college C. if there is no punishment, then why have the rule?
again, im all for athletes getting paid. the NCAA is as crooked and misguided as any organization in america imo. im not against cam here whatsoever. im just questioning the NCAA decision to withold punishment when one of there rules has without question been viloated. by not enforcing their own rules, then they giving every middle man that wants to make money from these athletes the oppurtunity to do so without any repercution.
and yes, i understand the investigation is not over
yea u arent understanding this right. first of all, the investigation isnt over. second, this ruling was based on Cecil Newtons contact with MSU and not Auburn. There has still been ZERO proof any wrongdoing occured between the Newtons and Auburn. Solicitation at another school where no commitment was ever made, and the people Cecil Newton(ONLY) spoke with about a possible pay-to-play deal are saying NO MONEY ever exhanged hands is not cause for Auburn or Cam Newton to be in jeoprady. The ONLY thing left to threaten either is whether evidence can be brought forth showing that Auburn offered money to Cecil Newton or the Newton family, a claim THAT NOBODY HAS MADE SINCE THIS STORY BROKE. everything that has been said over the past month was only regarding MSU, and i really dont think the NCAA/FBI/SEC will find any wrongdoing on Auburns behalf. Again, i must stress, that NOBODY has even made a claim that Auburn did anything wrong, nor has there been any proof of it.
it doesnt matter what happened between cam and auburn. cam's father solicited his son to MSU. they didnt get the money, so he moves on to auburn. i dont care if any money every exchanged hands. by not punishing cam, the ncaa is opening up a can or worms imo. whats to keep the next guy's father from soliciting his son to college A, then college B, then college C. if there is no punishment, then why have the rule?
again, im all for athletes getting paid. the NCAA is as crooked and misguided as any organization in america imo. im not against cam here whatsoever. im just questioning the NCAA decision to withold punishment when one of there rules has without question been viloated. by not enforcing their own rules, then they giving every middle man that wants to make money from these athletes the oppurtunity to do so without any repercution.
and yes, i understand the investigation is not over
it doesnt matter if it ever exchanged hands or not. NCAA rules state that you cant solicit services. it is fact that cam's father did so. and the punishment is......
dont get me wrong, im not against cam on this. im all for athlete rights. i think they should be represented, i think they should be able to have agents and i think they should be paid to a certain extent.
my point is in reference to the NCAA rulebook. you cannot solicit services. the ruling to allow cam to play is saying that there is no punishment for doing so. the NCAA had a chance to make an example here. by not doing so, they are opening up the possibility for any middle man to solicit services to a school without any type of repercution as long as the athlete "doesnt know". thats all im trying to point out.
it doesnt matter if it ever exchanged hands or not. NCAA rules state that you cant solicit services. it is fact that cam's father did so. and the punishment is......
dont get me wrong, im not against cam on this. im all for athlete rights. i think they should be represented, i think they should be able to have agents and i think they should be paid to a certain extent.
my point is in reference to the NCAA rulebook. you cannot solicit services. the ruling to allow cam to play is saying that there is no punishment for doing so. the NCAA had a chance to make an example here. by not doing so, they are opening up the possibility for any middle man to solicit services to a school without any type of repercution as long as the athlete "doesnt know". thats all im trying to point out.
Its the SEC anything Goes
always has always Will????
anyways back to Urban Meyer
How many KIDS has he had arrested >>>>
Its the SEC anything Goes
always has always Will????
anyways back to Urban Meyer
How many KIDS has he had arrested >>>>
you are missing the fine print...
If Cam was playing at MSU right now, hed probably be ruled ineligible and it would stay that way-----although i dont think this fuckface Rogers would have said anything in the first place. the difference is that hes playing at Auburn, and no wrongdoing by the Newtons or AUBURN has even been claimed to have taken place, much less proven, like i said above. that is the key difference here.
i can accept this because no, i dont think it would be appropriate to punish auburn because there isnt anything linking auburn to any wrongdoing. i just think that the NCAA infractions committee has to be held to some level of accountability when it comes to enforcing the rules that are in place. without doing so, they are setting a dangerous precedent imo. i understand your point though.
you are missing the fine print...
If Cam was playing at MSU right now, hed probably be ruled ineligible and it would stay that way-----although i dont think this fuckface Rogers would have said anything in the first place. the difference is that hes playing at Auburn, and no wrongdoing by the Newtons or AUBURN has even been claimed to have taken place, much less proven, like i said above. that is the key difference here.
i can accept this because no, i dont think it would be appropriate to punish auburn because there isnt anything linking auburn to any wrongdoing. i just think that the NCAA infractions committee has to be held to some level of accountability when it comes to enforcing the rules that are in place. without doing so, they are setting a dangerous precedent imo. i understand your point though.
Its the SEC anything Goes
always has always Will????
anyways back to Urban Meyer
How many KIDS has he had arrested >>>>
honestly who cares ......... as long as they cover the spread every saturday and sometimes thursdays and fridays
Its the SEC anything Goes
always has always Will????
anyways back to Urban Meyer
How many KIDS has he had arrested >>>>
honestly who cares ......... as long as they cover the spread every saturday and sometimes thursdays and fridays
Scam Newton didn't know his father was soliciting money?
Scam Newton didn't steal the throw away laptop?
Scam Newton didn't steal some reports online?
Why would he ever think he'll get in any real trouble.
Scam Newton didn't know his father was soliciting money?
Scam Newton didn't steal the throw away laptop?
Scam Newton didn't steal some reports online?
Why would he ever think he'll get in any real trouble.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.