2-2-2011
Not trying to come up with my own trend. Was just trying to save you work so you didn't have to follow this anymore. Your trend is 51.3% since 1990....
Not trying to come up with my own trend. Was just trying to save you work so you didn't have to follow this anymore. Your trend is 51.3% since 1990....
Not trying to come up with my own trend. Was just trying to save you work so you didn't have to follow this anymore. Your trend is 51.3% since 1990....
Hi gcnmoo
Would you be able to help me with some research Im doing on CBB. Im looking for numbers of home/away dogs of +13/13.5/14 & 14.5 ats and ml if possible and also home/away favs of -15/-15.5 & -16 if you could help me out with any numbers that would be much appreciated.
Cheers if you can assist.
Home dogs between 13-14.5 are 162-178-0 (47.6%) ATS since 1990 and 27-319 on the ML. Some of the smaller conferences did not have lines for the better half of the 90s remember.
Away dogs between 13-14.5 are 1211-1146-64 ATS (51.3%) and 192-2229 ML
Home dogs between 15-16 are 66-64-5 ATS since 90 (50.7%) and 8-127 on the ML
Away dogs between 15-16 are 670-667-46 ATS (50.1%) and 63-1320 on the ML
Hi gcnmoo
Would you be able to help me with some research Im doing on CBB. Im looking for numbers of home/away dogs of +13/13.5/14 & 14.5 ats and ml if possible and also home/away favs of -15/-15.5 & -16 if you could help me out with any numbers that would be much appreciated.
Cheers if you can assist.
Home dogs between 13-14.5 are 162-178-0 (47.6%) ATS since 1990 and 27-319 on the ML. Some of the smaller conferences did not have lines for the better half of the 90s remember.
Away dogs between 13-14.5 are 1211-1146-64 ATS (51.3%) and 192-2229 ML
Home dogs between 15-16 are 66-64-5 ATS since 90 (50.7%) and 8-127 on the ML
Away dogs between 15-16 are 670-667-46 ATS (50.1%) and 63-1320 on the ML
Ok, this guy has got to be saying to himself ,"are you f-ing kidding me." Part of this was my fault by saying I'm picking 3 games, but his system is based on "hometeam revenge factor." Thats it, so, all games he posts are his plays. You do with them as you wish, but it really is that simple. Home team revenge factor.
Ok, this guy has got to be saying to himself ,"are you f-ing kidding me." Part of this was my fault by saying I'm picking 3 games, but his system is based on "hometeam revenge factor." Thats it, so, all games he posts are his plays. You do with them as you wish, but it really is that simple. Home team revenge factor.
add Az @STAN, stan lost @az by 10 on 1-9-11
add Az @STAN, stan lost @az by 10 on 1-9-11
Ok, this guy has got to be saying to himself ,"are you f-ing kidding me." Part of this was my fault by saying I'm picking 3 games, but his system is based on "hometeam revenge factor." Thats it, so, all games he posts are his plays. You do with them as you wish, but it really is that simple. Home team revenge factor.
Home teams that lost by 10-19 pts in the first game (on the road), are 51.3% ATS since 1990. Isn't that the trend you guys are trying to follow?
Ok, this guy has got to be saying to himself ,"are you f-ing kidding me." Part of this was my fault by saying I'm picking 3 games, but his system is based on "hometeam revenge factor." Thats it, so, all games he posts are his plays. You do with them as you wish, but it really is that simple. Home team revenge factor.
Home teams that lost by 10-19 pts in the first game (on the road), are 51.3% ATS since 1990. Isn't that the trend you guys are trying to follow?
Most of the 50% that win straight up are favorites, not dogs...
Most of the 50% that win straight up are favorites, not dogs...
I'm telling you the record from the past 20 years so you don't have to keep following it!
Teams at home with revenge (lost previous game same year on the road) are 3721-3597-175 (50.9%) ATS since 1990.
No need to keep following, just trying to save you some time my man.
I'm telling you the record from the past 20 years so you don't have to keep following it!
Teams at home with revenge (lost previous game same year on the road) are 3721-3597-175 (50.9%) ATS since 1990.
No need to keep following, just trying to save you some time my man.
add Az @STAN, stan lost @az by 10 on 1-9-11
add Az @STAN, stan lost @az by 10 on 1-9-11
np--Thanks for the time you put into this, if I see something, I'll post. gl tonight
np--Thanks for the time you put into this, if I see something, I'll post. gl tonight
Home teams that lost by 10-19 pts in the first game (on the road), are 51.3% ATS since 1990. Isn't that the trend you guys are trying to follow?
Home teams that lost by 10-19 pts in the first game (on the road), are 51.3% ATS since 1990. Isn't that the trend you guys are trying to follow?
I missed it as well, too busy cashing the others
I missed it as well, too busy cashing the others
yea, it's like they don't want to even hear it, haha. something to keep them busy i guess. oh well
yea, it's like they don't want to even hear it, haha. something to keep them busy i guess. oh well
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.