UNDER 78
Projected Total: 54
You are right he is legit. I always look forward to his system plays but this one I could no go with. The pace was been crazy and knowing the way WASH plays ball they will not slow down. Heck there has already been 44 points in 8.5 minutes. BOL Raider... I am on WASH +1 and WASH team total over 38.5. BOL!
You are right he is legit. I always look forward to his system plays but this one I could no go with. The pace was been crazy and knowing the way WASH plays ball they will not slow down. Heck there has already been 44 points in 8.5 minutes. BOL Raider... I am on WASH +1 and WASH team total over 38.5. BOL!
No he was very clear. His play was under 78 because his system says that the total should be 54. Usually when you see this type of disparity his system plays are right on. But I don't know if his system take into account pace of play such as we saw in the 1H. It was pretty frantic.
No he was very clear. His play was under 78 because his system says that the total should be 54. Usually when you see this type of disparity his system plays are right on. But I don't know if his system take into account pace of play such as we saw in the 1H. It was pretty frantic.
No he was very clear. His play was under 78 because his system says that the total should be 54. Usually when you see this type of disparity his system plays are right on. But I don't know if his system take into account pace of play such as we saw in the 1H. It was pretty frantic.
true, but 54??? thats very difficult to take, i doubt that there are anymore than maybe 2 halfs today that have gone under that total. /No matter what the pace is. Thats only 11 shots per 10 minutes.
No he was very clear. His play was under 78 because his system says that the total should be 54. Usually when you see this type of disparity his system plays are right on. But I don't know if his system take into account pace of play such as we saw in the 1H. It was pretty frantic.
true, but 54??? thats very difficult to take, i doubt that there are anymore than maybe 2 halfs today that have gone under that total. /No matter what the pace is. Thats only 11 shots per 10 minutes.
true, but 54??? thats very difficult to take, i doubt that there are anymore than maybe 2 halfs today that have gone under that total. /No matter what the pace is. Thats only 11 shots per 10 minutes.
Haven't you ever seen Pacific play (among a couple others). Once the halftime score was 23-12. Just saying definately possible. Of course WASH is no Pacific. BOL!
true, but 54??? thats very difficult to take, i doubt that there are anymore than maybe 2 halfs today that have gone under that total. /No matter what the pace is. Thats only 11 shots per 10 minutes.
Haven't you ever seen Pacific play (among a couple others). Once the halftime score was 23-12. Just saying definately possible. Of course WASH is no Pacific. BOL!
LOL what is up your a$$? Point is it bearly went over and people are crucifying him like it was the worst call that ever exited. Get a grip.
LOL what is up your a$$? Point is it bearly went over and people are crucifying him like it was the worst call that ever exited. Get a grip.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.