If you could, wait till the Ducks game starts before you post your Saturday picks. Makes it much more easy to do the board that way.
Don't forget to quote your first picks if you add more later.
Always wipe your feet when you go inside.
Always give two shakes when you finish. More than that you are just enjoying it.
Well that covers it....
Oh yeah
Edmonton and Pitt took out most of the board and I knew the Kings were higher on the suck factor than the Nucks !!!
hockeytown71 3-0 Mclovin604 2-0 (Very smart PL play on the dogs) 10-4 2-0 (Nailed a nice dog, 4-0 streak) sharpaction 1-0 (Hit last 3 games) bear 1-0 KingScorpio 1-0 (Nice call on TB, 3 game winning streak) bluesplayer 1-0 IronCobra 1-0 (You have turned it around) nickypockets 1-0 (Won with ease) RovingGambler 1-0
Bucknut07 4-1 collectNOW 3-1 (Hit a parlay) newyorker35 3-1 (Great hit on TB, 5-01 run) zipnjaz 3-1
Friday, Oct. 31
Dallas at Chicago, 8:30 p.m. Vancouver at Anaheim, 10 p.m.
November
Saturday, Nov. 1
Edmonton at Carolina, 3 p.m. Dallas at Boston, 7 p.m. Washington at Buffalo, 7 p.m. N.Y. Rangers at Toronto, 7 p.m. Atlanta at New Jersey, 7 p.m. Montreal at N.Y. Islanders, 7 p.m. Chicago at Columbus, 7 p.m. Ottawa at Tampa Bay, 7:30 p.m. Florida at Nashville, 8 p.m. Pittsburgh at St. Louis, 8:30 p.m. Minnesota at Phoenix, 10 p.m. Calgary at Los Angeles, 10 p.m.
If you could, wait till the Ducks game starts before you post your Saturday picks. Makes it much more easy to do the board that way.
Don't forget to quote your first picks if you add more later.
Always wipe your feet when you go inside.
Always give two shakes when you finish. More than that you are just enjoying it.
Well that covers it....
Oh yeah
Edmonton and Pitt took out most of the board and I knew the Kings were higher on the suck factor than the Nucks !!!
hockeytown71 3-0 Mclovin604 2-0 (Very smart PL play on the dogs) 10-4 2-0 (Nailed a nice dog, 4-0 streak) sharpaction 1-0 (Hit last 3 games) bear 1-0 KingScorpio 1-0 (Nice call on TB, 3 game winning streak) bluesplayer 1-0 IronCobra 1-0 (You have turned it around) nickypockets 1-0 (Won with ease) RovingGambler 1-0
Bucknut07 4-1 collectNOW 3-1 (Hit a parlay) newyorker35 3-1 (Great hit on TB, 5-01 run) zipnjaz 3-1
Friday, Oct. 31
Dallas at Chicago, 8:30 p.m. Vancouver at Anaheim, 10 p.m.
November
Saturday, Nov. 1
Edmonton at Carolina, 3 p.m. Dallas at Boston, 7 p.m. Washington at Buffalo, 7 p.m. N.Y. Rangers at Toronto, 7 p.m. Atlanta at New Jersey, 7 p.m. Montreal at N.Y. Islanders, 7 p.m. Chicago at Columbus, 7 p.m. Ottawa at Tampa Bay, 7:30 p.m. Florida at Nashville, 8 p.m. Pittsburgh at St. Louis, 8:30 p.m. Minnesota at Phoenix, 10 p.m. Calgary at Los Angeles, 10 p.m.
Lipps......does juice factor in when you post the leaderboard? Is it the record or profit margin you are looking for? I know a poster has to have an undefeated night or be 2 games over .500 to be mentioned ,but a few posters are just taking the heavy favorite at -240 or has 4-6 games with an average juice of -150. Going 4-2 means nothing if you broke even.I would give more props to a guy like sharpaction who goes 1-1 or 2-1 with an average juice in the plus or all dogs.I see guys boasting of a 17-6 record who never posts what he got the line at,but if you look it up,his average juice is -150,which would mean HE HAS to go 17-6 just to break even.Just my 2 cents,but this thread is getting alot of -250 games or a tt over which is -160 just to see their name in print.I think it's more creative when dogs or parlays are hit instead of "the obvious". Just my 2 cents. Thanks for the diligent and hard work you do late every night keeping track.
Lipps......does juice factor in when you post the leaderboard? Is it the record or profit margin you are looking for? I know a poster has to have an undefeated night or be 2 games over .500 to be mentioned ,but a few posters are just taking the heavy favorite at -240 or has 4-6 games with an average juice of -150. Going 4-2 means nothing if you broke even.I would give more props to a guy like sharpaction who goes 1-1 or 2-1 with an average juice in the plus or all dogs.I see guys boasting of a 17-6 record who never posts what he got the line at,but if you look it up,his average juice is -150,which would mean HE HAS to go 17-6 just to break even.Just my 2 cents,but this thread is getting alot of -250 games or a tt over which is -160 just to see their name in print.I think it's more creative when dogs or parlays are hit instead of "the obvious". Just my 2 cents. Thanks for the diligent and hard work you do late every night keeping track.
Lipps......does juice factor in when you post the leaderboard? Is it the record or profit margin you are looking for? I know a poster has to have an undefeated night or be 2 games over .500 to be mentioned ,but a few posters are just taking the heavy favorite at -240 or has 4-6 games with an average juice of -150. Going 4-2 means nothing if you broke even.I would give more props to a guy like sharpaction who goes 1-1 or 2-1 with an average juice in the plus or all dogs.I see guys boasting of a 17-6 record who never posts what he got the line at,but if you look it up,his average juice is -150,which would mean HE HAS to go 17-6 just to break even.Just my 2 cents,but this thread is getting alot of -250 games or a tt over which is -160 just to see their name in print.I think it's more creative when dogs or parlays are hit instead of "the obvious". Just my 2 cents. Thanks for the diligent and hard work you do late every night keeping track.
Yep, you will see some take those high juice dogs every night. You can tell who picks to be on the leaderboard and who actually lays down the hard earned cash when the wagers are made.
Sometimes I will make mention of someone who hits a sweeeet pick that doesn't hit the usual parameters of making the leaderboard. If people come in here every day they know who is juicing it and who is doing thier homework.
Now take KingScorpio for example. He picked the Nucks at a very nice +157 when I know there will be a good number of posters that will lay the ML on the Ducks because the Nucks have been playing poorly, played last night and the Duckies should win.
But the trip to Duckland isn't that far away from La La town. So that shouldn't even play into the capping.
Actually the Duckies should win, but they should not be at -167. No way they should be favored that much. So KS is playing a value play. He actually went down to....I don't know.....IP maybe, and layed down the cash on this wager.
I try to give props where I can, but some days the board is just so large it takes a great deal of time. Also as you have seen I have been slammed the past few days and haven't had time to do much of anything in the forum.
Lipps......does juice factor in when you post the leaderboard? Is it the record or profit margin you are looking for? I know a poster has to have an undefeated night or be 2 games over .500 to be mentioned ,but a few posters are just taking the heavy favorite at -240 or has 4-6 games with an average juice of -150. Going 4-2 means nothing if you broke even.I would give more props to a guy like sharpaction who goes 1-1 or 2-1 with an average juice in the plus or all dogs.I see guys boasting of a 17-6 record who never posts what he got the line at,but if you look it up,his average juice is -150,which would mean HE HAS to go 17-6 just to break even.Just my 2 cents,but this thread is getting alot of -250 games or a tt over which is -160 just to see their name in print.I think it's more creative when dogs or parlays are hit instead of "the obvious". Just my 2 cents. Thanks for the diligent and hard work you do late every night keeping track.
Yep, you will see some take those high juice dogs every night. You can tell who picks to be on the leaderboard and who actually lays down the hard earned cash when the wagers are made.
Sometimes I will make mention of someone who hits a sweeeet pick that doesn't hit the usual parameters of making the leaderboard. If people come in here every day they know who is juicing it and who is doing thier homework.
Now take KingScorpio for example. He picked the Nucks at a very nice +157 when I know there will be a good number of posters that will lay the ML on the Ducks because the Nucks have been playing poorly, played last night and the Duckies should win.
But the trip to Duckland isn't that far away from La La town. So that shouldn't even play into the capping.
Actually the Duckies should win, but they should not be at -167. No way they should be favored that much. So KS is playing a value play. He actually went down to....I don't know.....IP maybe, and layed down the cash on this wager.
I try to give props where I can, but some days the board is just so large it takes a great deal of time. Also as you have seen I have been slammed the past few days and haven't had time to do much of anything in the forum.
ok thanks, i love hockey, and will be away from my computer the two
weekend following this one, may i post my plays for the weelend on
friday. thanks lipps
ok thanks, i love hockey, and will be away from my computer the two
weekend following this one, may i post my plays for the weelend on
friday. thanks lipps
ok thanks, i love hockey, and will be away from my computer the two weekend following this one, may i post my plays for the weelend on friday. thanks lipps
ok thanks, i love hockey, and will be away from my computer the two weekend following this one, may i post my plays for the weelend on friday. thanks lipps
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.