We went 4-4 ATS for Christmas week with the Dolphins -4' and Colts UNDER 46 pending.
Angles....
a) Texans win and cover to bring the 2022 record to 15-0 ATS of away divisional dogs who lost their two previous away games....the Broncos and the Bears qualify this week.
b) Game number 16 teams with one or two less wins than their present opponent...103-59-4 ATS....ON Cardinals, Patriots, Browns, Bengals
c) Game number 16 away divisional dogs that rushed for over 200 yards their previous game....6-12 ATS VERSUS Panthers
d) Game number 16 home divisional favorites that have won either 11 or 12 games....25-9-1 ATS.....Chiefs
e) Game number 16 home divisional favorites that have won 6 games....5-12-1 ATS....both Packers and Bucs have 6 wins today with game number 15 games pending.
f) Game number 16 away divisional dogs that have won 6 games....22-14 ATS ON Panthers
g) Game number 16 away divisional dogs that have won 4 games....8-19 ATS....VERSUS Broncos
We went 4-4 ATS for Christmas week with the Dolphins -4' and Colts UNDER 46 pending.
Angles....
a) Texans win and cover to bring the 2022 record to 15-0 ATS of away divisional dogs who lost their two previous away games....the Broncos and the Bears qualify this week.
b) Game number 16 teams with one or two less wins than their present opponent...103-59-4 ATS....ON Cardinals, Patriots, Browns, Bengals
c) Game number 16 away divisional dogs that rushed for over 200 yards their previous game....6-12 ATS VERSUS Panthers
d) Game number 16 home divisional favorites that have won either 11 or 12 games....25-9-1 ATS.....Chiefs
e) Game number 16 home divisional favorites that have won 6 games....5-12-1 ATS....both Packers and Bucs have 6 wins today with game number 15 games pending.
f) Game number 16 away divisional dogs that have won 6 games....22-14 ATS ON Panthers
g) Game number 16 away divisional dogs that have won 4 games....8-19 ATS....VERSUS Broncos
I have run many queries with vastly different results for week < 16.5 and week > 16.5. The vast majority of these query results were from 16-game seasons wherein the week 17 games (the final regular-season games) featured many new, untested, inexperienced players and many starters resting for the playoffs.
This year's games number 16 are not the final regular-season games, so proceed gingerly.
I have run many queries with vastly different results for week < 16.5 and week > 16.5. The vast majority of these query results were from 16-game seasons wherein the week 17 games (the final regular-season games) featured many new, untested, inexperienced players and many starters resting for the playoffs.
This year's games number 16 are not the final regular-season games, so proceed gingerly.
I9, I suggest some caution with these queries. I have run many queries with vastly different results for week < 16.5 and week > 16.5. The vast majority of these query results were from 16-game seasons wherein the week 17 games (the final regular-season games) featured many new, untested, inexperienced players and many starters resting for the playoffs. This year's games number 16 are not the final regular-season games, so proceed gingerly. Good luck.
Yes, I am aware of that....'preciate the concern......
I9, I suggest some caution with these queries. I have run many queries with vastly different results for week < 16.5 and week > 16.5. The vast majority of these query results were from 16-game seasons wherein the week 17 games (the final regular-season games) featured many new, untested, inexperienced players and many starters resting for the playoffs. This year's games number 16 are not the final regular-season games, so proceed gingerly. Good luck.
Yes, I am aware of that....'preciate the concern......
Revising "e)"....both the Packers and Bucs won in game 15, so that angle is no longer relevant to either team.....
e) Home favorites in game number 16 with 7 wins exact have gone 24-16 ATS.....Packers, Bucs, Lions, Commanders
Revising "b)" slightly....
b) A game number 16 team with between 4 and 12 wins on the season, that has either one or two more wins than their present opponent....49-97-4 ATS.....VERSUS Falcons, Bucs, Commanders, Dolphins......as:
1) Home non-divisional favorites....7-9-1 ATS (+2.38), 10-7 SU (8.18).....Falcons, Commanders
2) Home divisional favorites.......14-31-1 ATS (-2.66), 28-18 SU (3.41)....Bucs
Revising "e)"....both the Packers and Bucs won in game 15, so that angle is no longer relevant to either team.....
e) Home favorites in game number 16 with 7 wins exact have gone 24-16 ATS.....Packers, Bucs, Lions, Commanders
Revising "b)" slightly....
b) A game number 16 team with between 4 and 12 wins on the season, that has either one or two more wins than their present opponent....49-97-4 ATS.....VERSUS Falcons, Bucs, Commanders, Dolphins......as:
1) Home non-divisional favorites....7-9-1 ATS (+2.38), 10-7 SU (8.18).....Falcons, Commanders
2) Home divisional favorites.......14-31-1 ATS (-2.66), 28-18 SU (3.41)....Bucs
Watched the Rams/Broncos game yesterday with interest.....it looks as if Baker Mayfield's career has been rescued off of life support by Sean McVay, and good for him. I would love to see him continue on as the Rams' starter, but that looks not-too-likely to happen....matching a player with the right system in crucial for players at all levels of sport....a coach can make or break careers....as we may be seeing with the Browns and the Broncos whose quarterbacks look broken.
I can not recall as rapid a demise as Russell Wilson's, and the Broncos had to get rid of either him or Nathaniel Hackett and the predictable result was they got rid of the guy they don't owe over 100 million to, which was Hackett. The Broncos will have to hire a quarterback whisperer in order to save that team four years of pain, and even then it is questionable that Wilson will ever be what he was. Two of his very best traits were his antennae in the pocket and his ability to avoid sacks, and those two attributes look like they are no longer part of Wilson's modus operandi. This season he has been a bottom three quarterback and next year we'll find out if this year's terrible play was Hackett's ineptitude or Wilson's demise. The Broncos did the right thing by firing Hackett,...now they'll have to find "that guy" much like the Vikings have for Kirk Cousins and the Giants did with Daniel Jones.
I am taking the Rams this week getting the points as this is a regional rivalry which always brings out the best in underdogs....both Pittsburgh and Carolina have solid indicators on them.....however A LOT of people saw what I saw this past weekend and both of these teams are underdogs with over 60% of the public on them, with the line moving strongly towards both team, and both of their quarterbacks are average at best, though Pickett's ceiling is very high in his future. Typically, but not always, underdogs with over 60% of the public on them makes those teams a no-play, as they haven't performed well in my over 10 years of tracking them.
I probably will be passing on the Steelers and Panthers.
Meanwhile the betting public was not sold on what the Rams and Mayfield did versus the Broncos, which is how I prefer it
Watched the Rams/Broncos game yesterday with interest.....it looks as if Baker Mayfield's career has been rescued off of life support by Sean McVay, and good for him. I would love to see him continue on as the Rams' starter, but that looks not-too-likely to happen....matching a player with the right system in crucial for players at all levels of sport....a coach can make or break careers....as we may be seeing with the Browns and the Broncos whose quarterbacks look broken.
I can not recall as rapid a demise as Russell Wilson's, and the Broncos had to get rid of either him or Nathaniel Hackett and the predictable result was they got rid of the guy they don't owe over 100 million to, which was Hackett. The Broncos will have to hire a quarterback whisperer in order to save that team four years of pain, and even then it is questionable that Wilson will ever be what he was. Two of his very best traits were his antennae in the pocket and his ability to avoid sacks, and those two attributes look like they are no longer part of Wilson's modus operandi. This season he has been a bottom three quarterback and next year we'll find out if this year's terrible play was Hackett's ineptitude or Wilson's demise. The Broncos did the right thing by firing Hackett,...now they'll have to find "that guy" much like the Vikings have for Kirk Cousins and the Giants did with Daniel Jones.
I am taking the Rams this week getting the points as this is a regional rivalry which always brings out the best in underdogs....both Pittsburgh and Carolina have solid indicators on them.....however A LOT of people saw what I saw this past weekend and both of these teams are underdogs with over 60% of the public on them, with the line moving strongly towards both team, and both of their quarterbacks are average at best, though Pickett's ceiling is very high in his future. Typically, but not always, underdogs with over 60% of the public on them makes those teams a no-play, as they haven't performed well in my over 10 years of tracking them.
I probably will be passing on the Steelers and Panthers.
Meanwhile the betting public was not sold on what the Rams and Mayfield did versus the Broncos, which is how I prefer it
We end up with a win on the MNF total.....we go 5-5 ATS for the week to go to 108-77 ATS for the season-to-date.
Chargers clinch a playoff birth....perhaps they'll put forth an effort next week against their Los Angeles neighbors, but perhaps not.
With the uncertainty of Tua playing next week the Dolphins have now become underdogs, which puts them in the same 15-0 ATS angle as the Bears and the Broncos this week that I mentioned earlier in this thread. If I played that game I would play the Patriots, but will probably pass.
Wish everyone a blessed holiday season and a good new year.
We end up with a win on the MNF total.....we go 5-5 ATS for the week to go to 108-77 ATS for the season-to-date.
Chargers clinch a playoff birth....perhaps they'll put forth an effort next week against their Los Angeles neighbors, but perhaps not.
With the uncertainty of Tua playing next week the Dolphins have now become underdogs, which puts them in the same 15-0 ATS angle as the Bears and the Broncos this week that I mentioned earlier in this thread. If I played that game I would play the Patriots, but will probably pass.
Wish everyone a blessed holiday season and a good new year.
Watched the Rams/Broncos game yesterday with interest.....it looks as if Baker Mayfield's career has been rescued off of life support by Sean McVay, and good for him. I would love to see him continue on as the Rams' starter, but that looks not-too-likely to happen....matching a player with the right system in crucial for players at all levels of sport....a coach can make or break careers....as we may be seeing with the Browns and the Broncos whose quarterbacks look broken. I can not recall as rapid a demise as Russell Wilson's, and the Broncos had to get rid of either him or Nathaniel Hackett and the predictable result was they got rid of the guy they don't owe over 100 million to, which was Hackett. The Broncos will have to hire a quarterback whisperer in order to save that team four years of pain, and even then it is questionable that Wilson will ever be what he was. Two of his very best traits were his antennae in the pocket and his ability to avoid sacks, and those two attributes look like they are no longer part of Wilson's modus operandi. This season he has been a bottom three quarterback and next year we'll find out if this year's terrible play was Hackett's ineptitude or Wilson's demise. The Broncos did the right thing by firing Hackett,...now they'll have to find "that guy" much like the Vikings have for Kirk Cousins and the Giants did with Daniel Jones. I am taking the Rams this week getting the points as this is a regional rivalry which always brings out the best in underdogs....both Pittsburgh and Carolina have solid indicators on them.....however A LOT of people saw what I saw this past weekend and both of these teams are underdogs with over 60% of the public on them, with the line moving strongly towards both team, and both of their quarterbacks are average at best, though Pickett's ceiling is very high in his future. Typically, but not always, underdogs with over 60% of the public on them makes those teams a no-play, as they haven't performed well in my over 10 years of tracking them. I probably will be passing on the Steelers and Panthers. Meanwhile the betting public was not sold on what the Rams and Mayfield did versus the Broncos, which is how I prefer it Adding: 3) Rams +7 _______________________ 2) Bears +5' 1) Falcons -3
Appreciate your continued wisdoms..Have a Happy NewYear indigo.
Watched the Rams/Broncos game yesterday with interest.....it looks as if Baker Mayfield's career has been rescued off of life support by Sean McVay, and good for him. I would love to see him continue on as the Rams' starter, but that looks not-too-likely to happen....matching a player with the right system in crucial for players at all levels of sport....a coach can make or break careers....as we may be seeing with the Browns and the Broncos whose quarterbacks look broken. I can not recall as rapid a demise as Russell Wilson's, and the Broncos had to get rid of either him or Nathaniel Hackett and the predictable result was they got rid of the guy they don't owe over 100 million to, which was Hackett. The Broncos will have to hire a quarterback whisperer in order to save that team four years of pain, and even then it is questionable that Wilson will ever be what he was. Two of his very best traits were his antennae in the pocket and his ability to avoid sacks, and those two attributes look like they are no longer part of Wilson's modus operandi. This season he has been a bottom three quarterback and next year we'll find out if this year's terrible play was Hackett's ineptitude or Wilson's demise. The Broncos did the right thing by firing Hackett,...now they'll have to find "that guy" much like the Vikings have for Kirk Cousins and the Giants did with Daniel Jones. I am taking the Rams this week getting the points as this is a regional rivalry which always brings out the best in underdogs....both Pittsburgh and Carolina have solid indicators on them.....however A LOT of people saw what I saw this past weekend and both of these teams are underdogs with over 60% of the public on them, with the line moving strongly towards both team, and both of their quarterbacks are average at best, though Pickett's ceiling is very high in his future. Typically, but not always, underdogs with over 60% of the public on them makes those teams a no-play, as they haven't performed well in my over 10 years of tracking them. I probably will be passing on the Steelers and Panthers. Meanwhile the betting public was not sold on what the Rams and Mayfield did versus the Broncos, which is how I prefer it Adding: 3) Rams +7 _______________________ 2) Bears +5' 1) Falcons -3
Appreciate your continued wisdoms..Have a Happy NewYear indigo.
@Indigo999 Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Watched the Rams/Broncos game yesterday with interest.....it looks as if Baker Mayfield's career has been rescued off of life support by Sean McVay, and good for him. I would love to see him continue on as the Rams' starter, but that looks not-too-likely to happen....matching a player with the right system in crucial for players at all levels of sport....a coach can make or break careers....as we may be seeing with the Browns and the Broncos whose quarterbacks look broken. I can not recall as rapid a demise as Russell Wilson's, and the Broncos had to get rid of either him or Nathaniel Hackett and the predictable result was they got rid of the guy they don't owe over 100 million to, which was Hackett. The Broncos will have to hire a quarterback whisperer in order to save that team four years of pain, and even then it is questionable that Wilson will ever be what he was. Two of his very best traits were his antennae in the pocket and his ability to avoid sacks, and those two attributes look like they are no longer part of Wilson's modus operandi. This season he has been a bottom three quarterback and next year we'll find out if this year's terrible play was Hackett's ineptitude or Wilson's demise. The Broncos did the right thing by firing Hackett,...now they'll have to find "that guy" much like the Vikings have for Kirk Cousins and the Giants did with Daniel Jones. I am taking the Rams this week getting the points as this is a regional rivalry which always brings out the best in underdogs....both Pittsburgh and Carolina have solid indicators on them.....however A LOT of people saw what I saw this past weekend and both of these teams are underdogs with over 60% of the public on them, with the line moving strongly towards both team, and both of their quarterbacks are average at best, though Pickett's ceiling is very high in his future. Typically, but not always, underdogs with over 60% of the public on them makes those teams a no-play, as they haven't performed well in my over 10 years of tracking them. I probably will be passing on the Steelers and Panthers. Meanwhile the betting public was not sold on what the Rams and Mayfield did versus the Broncos, which is how I prefer it Adding: 3) Rams +7 _______________________ 2) Bears +5' 1) Falcons -3 Appreciate your continued wisdoms..Have a Happy NewYear indigo.
Continued success to you....and happy new year....
@Indigo999 Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Watched the Rams/Broncos game yesterday with interest.....it looks as if Baker Mayfield's career has been rescued off of life support by Sean McVay, and good for him. I would love to see him continue on as the Rams' starter, but that looks not-too-likely to happen....matching a player with the right system in crucial for players at all levels of sport....a coach can make or break careers....as we may be seeing with the Browns and the Broncos whose quarterbacks look broken. I can not recall as rapid a demise as Russell Wilson's, and the Broncos had to get rid of either him or Nathaniel Hackett and the predictable result was they got rid of the guy they don't owe over 100 million to, which was Hackett. The Broncos will have to hire a quarterback whisperer in order to save that team four years of pain, and even then it is questionable that Wilson will ever be what he was. Two of his very best traits were his antennae in the pocket and his ability to avoid sacks, and those two attributes look like they are no longer part of Wilson's modus operandi. This season he has been a bottom three quarterback and next year we'll find out if this year's terrible play was Hackett's ineptitude or Wilson's demise. The Broncos did the right thing by firing Hackett,...now they'll have to find "that guy" much like the Vikings have for Kirk Cousins and the Giants did with Daniel Jones. I am taking the Rams this week getting the points as this is a regional rivalry which always brings out the best in underdogs....both Pittsburgh and Carolina have solid indicators on them.....however A LOT of people saw what I saw this past weekend and both of these teams are underdogs with over 60% of the public on them, with the line moving strongly towards both team, and both of their quarterbacks are average at best, though Pickett's ceiling is very high in his future. Typically, but not always, underdogs with over 60% of the public on them makes those teams a no-play, as they haven't performed well in my over 10 years of tracking them. I probably will be passing on the Steelers and Panthers. Meanwhile the betting public was not sold on what the Rams and Mayfield did versus the Broncos, which is how I prefer it Adding: 3) Rams +7 _______________________ 2) Bears +5' 1) Falcons -3 Appreciate your continued wisdoms..Have a Happy NewYear indigo.
Continued success to you....and happy new year....
Happy New Year everybody. Currently there is a 93% chance of rain here in Los Angeles on New Year's Eve. I'll just stay home and root for OHST vs GEO. I might even watch some of that game.
I've got the Bulldogs for a unit in that game.....oughta be an interesting game.....
Happy New Year everybody. Currently there is a 93% chance of rain here in Los Angeles on New Year's Eve. I'll just stay home and root for OHST vs GEO. I might even watch some of that game.
I've got the Bulldogs for a unit in that game.....oughta be an interesting game.....
Regarding nba...I may have a good potential query for you...I have been following it when i notice too...think its 3-0 last 3 (min@dal few weeks ago and port/okc the same night. Both 2nd games went under)
The past 2 seasons. Teams playing 2 games in a row vs same opponent..What % does the under hit in the 2nd game???
Not sure if u can enter that in either of your options but I have been tracking it but not on paper...but I think the under has been hitting pretty good in the 2ne game....
sometimes they play b2b...sometimes they get a day off between games....tonight it would be denver@sac...just played last night...only thing with this specific matchup is both teams can score and sac doesn't play D ...and last nights game already did go way under....
Regarding nba...I may have a good potential query for you...I have been following it when i notice too...think its 3-0 last 3 (min@dal few weeks ago and port/okc the same night. Both 2nd games went under)
The past 2 seasons. Teams playing 2 games in a row vs same opponent..What % does the under hit in the 2nd game???
Not sure if u can enter that in either of your options but I have been tracking it but not on paper...but I think the under has been hitting pretty good in the 2ne game....
sometimes they play b2b...sometimes they get a day off between games....tonight it would be denver@sac...just played last night...only thing with this specific matchup is both teams can score and sac doesn't play D ...and last nights game already did go way under....
@Indigo999 Gl I99 Regarding nba...I may have a good potential query for you...I have been following it when i notice too...think its 3-0 last 3 (min@dal few weeks ago and port/okc the same night. Both 2nd games went under) The past 2 seasons. Teams playing 2 games in a row vs same opponent..What % does the under hit in the 2nd game??? Not sure if u can enter that in either of your options but I have been tracking it but not on paper...but I think the under has been hitting pretty good in the 2ne game.... sometimes they play b2b...sometimes they get a day off between games....tonight it would be denver@sac...just played last night...only thing with this specific matchup is both teams can score and sac doesn't play D ...and last nights game already did go way under....
Home dogs in the this situation (Sac/Den) with no rest have been 12-14 ATS, 7-17 o/u since 2012,.....5-3 ATS and 2-5-1 o/u if the home team lost the previous night as a home dog.
The Commanders are turning to Carson Wentz to start at qb this weekend....the Washington organization (and the Colts) obviously have very different perceptions than mine.........since his near MVP like season with the Eagles the guy has been a solid loser as an NFL quarterback.....I makethe difference between him and Taylor Heinicke at about 7 points/game.
Washington is making a mistake in starting Wentz.....Heinicke is a baller who gets the most out of his team and Wentz for whatever reason lowers his team's performance, Wentz just has a knack of making bonehead plays.
The NFL is about making assessments and judgements, and of course the two most important entities to do that with is the head coach and the quarterback. My assessment is that the Commanders find a way to lose, either this week or next and if they do somehow make the playoffs with Wentz, that he'll cost his team in a playoff game.
He is a ticking time bomb that I am willing to fade.
Could I be wrong?....ja, I am wrong frequently, we'll see what happens this Sunday.
@Indigo999 Gl I99 Regarding nba...I may have a good potential query for you...I have been following it when i notice too...think its 3-0 last 3 (min@dal few weeks ago and port/okc the same night. Both 2nd games went under) The past 2 seasons. Teams playing 2 games in a row vs same opponent..What % does the under hit in the 2nd game??? Not sure if u can enter that in either of your options but I have been tracking it but not on paper...but I think the under has been hitting pretty good in the 2ne game.... sometimes they play b2b...sometimes they get a day off between games....tonight it would be denver@sac...just played last night...only thing with this specific matchup is both teams can score and sac doesn't play D ...and last nights game already did go way under....
Home dogs in the this situation (Sac/Den) with no rest have been 12-14 ATS, 7-17 o/u since 2012,.....5-3 ATS and 2-5-1 o/u if the home team lost the previous night as a home dog.
The Commanders are turning to Carson Wentz to start at qb this weekend....the Washington organization (and the Colts) obviously have very different perceptions than mine.........since his near MVP like season with the Eagles the guy has been a solid loser as an NFL quarterback.....I makethe difference between him and Taylor Heinicke at about 7 points/game.
Washington is making a mistake in starting Wentz.....Heinicke is a baller who gets the most out of his team and Wentz for whatever reason lowers his team's performance, Wentz just has a knack of making bonehead plays.
The NFL is about making assessments and judgements, and of course the two most important entities to do that with is the head coach and the quarterback. My assessment is that the Commanders find a way to lose, either this week or next and if they do somehow make the playoffs with Wentz, that he'll cost his team in a playoff game.
He is a ticking time bomb that I am willing to fade.
Could I be wrong?....ja, I am wrong frequently, we'll see what happens this Sunday.
The public consensus on the Panthers has come waaaay down as people have decided to swallow the Tom Brady Kool-aid once again.
I am taking the Panthers
Away divisional dogs in game number 16 with one or two less wins than their present opponent have been 31-16-1 ATS.....if they:
1) Are off a game where they rushed for over 150 yards they've been 5-0 ATS (+12.00), 4-1 straight up (+6.20)
2) Have 6 wins on the season 10-1 ATS (+4.77), 5-6 straight up (-0.55)
Plays.....adding:
4) Panthers +3
5) Browns +110
______________________
3) Bears +5'
2) Falcons -3
1) Rams +7
I took two early games next week.........the Vikings could could be playing for the number one seed (highly unlikely) or more likely, they will be playing to avoid being relegated to the 3rd seed, but smoke and mirrors can only last so long, they could lose their last two games on the road in-division.
They could concede their final game if they lose to the Packers as the 49ers play the hapless the Cardinals their final game. An even better scenario would be if the Eagles won this weekend, the Vikings won at Green Bay, and the 49ers lost (stranger things have happened), which would lock the Vikings into the second seed, and they would basically lay down in their finale against the Bears.
The public consensus on the Panthers has come waaaay down as people have decided to swallow the Tom Brady Kool-aid once again.
I am taking the Panthers
Away divisional dogs in game number 16 with one or two less wins than their present opponent have been 31-16-1 ATS.....if they:
1) Are off a game where they rushed for over 150 yards they've been 5-0 ATS (+12.00), 4-1 straight up (+6.20)
2) Have 6 wins on the season 10-1 ATS (+4.77), 5-6 straight up (-0.55)
Plays.....adding:
4) Panthers +3
5) Browns +110
______________________
3) Bears +5'
2) Falcons -3
1) Rams +7
I took two early games next week.........the Vikings could could be playing for the number one seed (highly unlikely) or more likely, they will be playing to avoid being relegated to the 3rd seed, but smoke and mirrors can only last so long, they could lose their last two games on the road in-division.
They could concede their final game if they lose to the Packers as the 49ers play the hapless the Cardinals their final game. An even better scenario would be if the Eagles won this weekend, the Vikings won at Green Bay, and the 49ers lost (stranger things have happened), which would lock the Vikings into the second seed, and they would basically lay down in their finale against the Bears.
I’m in a points league and trying to pick between Giants and Lions. I’m in 4th place but very close to 2nd and 3rd. Between these 2 teams who do you feel will win or lose by the largest margin. I appreciate your write ups each week and was wondering your thoughts
I’m in a points league and trying to pick between Giants and Lions. I’m in 4th place but very close to 2nd and 3rd. Between these 2 teams who do you feel will win or lose by the largest margin. I appreciate your write ups each week and was wondering your thoughts
Indigo I’m in a points league and trying to pick between Giants and Lions. I’m in 4th place but very close to 2nd and 3rd. Between these 2 teams who do you feel will win or lose by the largest margin. I appreciate your write ups each week and was wondering your thoughts Aloha and Happy New year
Just got back from the Aloha state....got covid on the plane over and was sick the whole time in Honolulu....lol.
I think the Giants win by more than the Lions do....good fortune on the remainder of your season.
Indigo I’m in a points league and trying to pick between Giants and Lions. I’m in 4th place but very close to 2nd and 3rd. Between these 2 teams who do you feel will win or lose by the largest margin. I appreciate your write ups each week and was wondering your thoughts Aloha and Happy New year
Just got back from the Aloha state....got covid on the plane over and was sick the whole time in Honolulu....lol.
I think the Giants win by more than the Lions do....good fortune on the remainder of your season.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.