As a retired race and sports book writer from Las Vegas, everyone has a different strategy. and guess what, not everyone has a 100 unit bankroll! Some have a 1000 unit bankroll and others no bankroll at all.
Did you know that Calvin Johnson may not even play tonight for Detroit. I would think you would want all your ducks in a row to maximize the chance of the game going over.
On the bright side, I heard that Oakland's offense looked good this week, but they were practicing against the Dallas defense so take that for what it's worth.
In my opinion you think this may be a system play, but as far as strong, you have failed to show the intangibles that make it so. I don't bet: he said, she said, and it's preseason so your unit play should be half of what you would normally play.
As far as I'm concerned there are no strong plays in the preseason. Your working on information, depth, QB rotation and preseason coaching records to come up with a hypothesis. Who is playing and for how long is up to the coach. You can't gauge what rookie players are going to do in the 4th quarter. so system that.
As a retired race and sports book writer from Las Vegas, everyone has a different strategy. and guess what, not everyone has a 100 unit bankroll! Some have a 1000 unit bankroll and others no bankroll at all.
Did you know that Calvin Johnson may not even play tonight for Detroit. I would think you would want all your ducks in a row to maximize the chance of the game going over.
On the bright side, I heard that Oakland's offense looked good this week, but they were practicing against the Dallas defense so take that for what it's worth.
In my opinion you think this may be a system play, but as far as strong, you have failed to show the intangibles that make it so. I don't bet: he said, she said, and it's preseason so your unit play should be half of what you would normally play.
As far as I'm concerned there are no strong plays in the preseason. Your working on information, depth, QB rotation and preseason coaching records to come up with a hypothesis. Who is playing and for how long is up to the coach. You can't gauge what rookie players are going to do in the 4th quarter. so system that.
As a retired race and sports book writer from Las Vegas, everyone has a different strategy. and guess what, not everyone has a 100 unit bankroll! Some have a 1000 unit bankroll and others no bankroll at all.
Did you know that Calvin Johnson may not even play tonight for Detroit. I would think you would want all your ducks in a row to maximize the chance of the game going over.
On the bright side, I heard that Oakland's offense looked good this week, but they were practicing against the Dallas defense so take that for what it's worth.
In my opinion you think this may be a system play, but as far as strong, you have failed to show the intangibles that make it so. I don't bet: he said, she said, and it's preseason so your unit play should be half of what you would normally play.
As far as I'm concerned there are no strong plays in the preseason. Your working on information, depth, QB rotation and preseason coaching records to come up with a hypothesis. Who is playing and for how long is up to the coach. You can't gauge what rookie players are going to do in the 4th quarter. so system that.
As a retired race and sports book writer from Las Vegas, everyone has a different strategy. and guess what, not everyone has a 100 unit bankroll! Some have a 1000 unit bankroll and others no bankroll at all.
Did you know that Calvin Johnson may not even play tonight for Detroit. I would think you would want all your ducks in a row to maximize the chance of the game going over.
On the bright side, I heard that Oakland's offense looked good this week, but they were practicing against the Dallas defense so take that for what it's worth.
In my opinion you think this may be a system play, but as far as strong, you have failed to show the intangibles that make it so. I don't bet: he said, she said, and it's preseason so your unit play should be half of what you would normally play.
As far as I'm concerned there are no strong plays in the preseason. Your working on information, depth, QB rotation and preseason coaching records to come up with a hypothesis. Who is playing and for how long is up to the coach. You can't gauge what rookie players are going to do in the 4th quarter. so system that.
I hate to be picky but 13-3 is not even close to 98% and to small a sample to be making any claims about a system. Thanks for your post.
I hate to be picky but 13-3 is not even close to 98% and to small a sample to be making any claims about a system. Thanks for your post.
I hate to be picky but 13-3 is not even close to 98% and to small a sample to be making any claims about a system. Thanks for your post.
I hate to be picky but 13-3 is not even close to 98% and to small a sample to be making any claims about a system. Thanks for your post.
Capper U. , The only thing that made me not interested in your friends system is I play per week, That's not enough to interest me into paying for the system. But, your arguments for betting a1,5 % of bankroll were dead on. Based on my expected win % using Kelly Criterion, I bet 2,5% of bankroll. You need the mindset that your investing, not gambling. It's a business, run it like one.
Capper U. , The only thing that made me not interested in your friends system is I play per week, That's not enough to interest me into paying for the system. But, your arguments for betting a1,5 % of bankroll were dead on. Based on my expected win % using Kelly Criterion, I bet 2,5% of bankroll. You need the mindset that your investing, not gambling. It's a business, run it like one.
Capper U. , The only thing that made me not interested in your friends system is I play per week, That's not enough to interest me into paying for the system. But, your arguments for betting a1,5 % of bankroll were dead on. Based on my expected win % using Kelly Criterion, I bet 2,5% of bankroll. You need the mindset that your investing, not gambling. It's a business, run it like one.
I think we're on the same side here, in regards to it being a business and everything, although they don't sell the service at this time. It doesn't come down to flat betting 1.5% each week or anything as for them it's anything above a threshold percentage and they will hit it. I respect them a lot for it because that means they: A) do not force plays & B) respect their money and treat it as an investment. (I'm actually impressed because they refuse to bet playoffs as they don't have the proper numbers & can't track the market as well due to the line changes inconsistencies.)
If they do choose to provide it as a service, I spoke with them and they expect to have at least 2 plays per wk. over the span of 16 weeks to average at least 32 plays over the stretch of the season.
They're leaning to create a service actually, documented results and everything. They actually met with a top handicapper (tout) service that offered them a large sum of money to sell it directly to them and remove all of the algorithms from their computers and teach them how to run it. They have turned it down thus far; as I expect them to take the service route.
I haven't been online here, but I will try to share and help whenever I can! Hope you all have a bunch of success this year :)
Capper U. , The only thing that made me not interested in your friends system is I play per week, That's not enough to interest me into paying for the system. But, your arguments for betting a1,5 % of bankroll were dead on. Based on my expected win % using Kelly Criterion, I bet 2,5% of bankroll. You need the mindset that your investing, not gambling. It's a business, run it like one.
I think we're on the same side here, in regards to it being a business and everything, although they don't sell the service at this time. It doesn't come down to flat betting 1.5% each week or anything as for them it's anything above a threshold percentage and they will hit it. I respect them a lot for it because that means they: A) do not force plays & B) respect their money and treat it as an investment. (I'm actually impressed because they refuse to bet playoffs as they don't have the proper numbers & can't track the market as well due to the line changes inconsistencies.)
If they do choose to provide it as a service, I spoke with them and they expect to have at least 2 plays per wk. over the span of 16 weeks to average at least 32 plays over the stretch of the season.
They're leaning to create a service actually, documented results and everything. They actually met with a top handicapper (tout) service that offered them a large sum of money to sell it directly to them and remove all of the algorithms from their computers and teach them how to run it. They have turned it down thus far; as I expect them to take the service route.
I haven't been online here, but I will try to share and help whenever I can! Hope you all have a bunch of success this year :)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.