The Packers defense should have better results playing vs. the Eagles offense. That's the first thing I see here. Second thing, Aaron Rodgers has been playing well the last 3 or 4 weeks, MVP type numbers.
I lean towards GB covering and probably winning this game, that game total of 47.5 is going too be tight.
The Packers defense should have better results playing vs. the Eagles offense. That's the first thing I see here. Second thing, Aaron Rodgers has been playing well the last 3 or 4 weeks, MVP type numbers.
I lean towards GB covering and probably winning this game, that game total of 47.5 is going too be tight.
The sheer fact that I'm getting this many points with MF Rodgers over the rook is just amazing .... if these picks lose I'll gladly pay but this is good value, packers should hang 28-35 on these MFs
The sheer fact that I'm getting this many points with MF Rodgers over the rook is just amazing .... if these picks lose I'll gladly pay but this is good value, packers should hang 28-35 on these MFs
Cub totally agree with what your seeing with gbay d having better results ... I think they match up well and not for nothing they hit rock bottom and there is only one way to go
Cub totally agree with what your seeing with gbay d having better results ... I think they match up well and not for nothing they hit rock bottom and there is only one way to go
The sheer fact that I'm getting this many points with MF Rodgers over the rook is just amazing .... if these picks lose I'll gladly pay but this is good value, packers should hang 28-35 on these MFs
Why should GB "hang 28-35 on those MFs"? GB averages 24.7 PPG & PHI defense allows 18.6. Doesn't sound like a recipe for 28-35 points for GB. What am I missing? I'm looking at GB around 22 points.
The sheer fact that I'm getting this many points with MF Rodgers over the rook is just amazing .... if these picks lose I'll gladly pay but this is good value, packers should hang 28-35 on these MFs
Why should GB "hang 28-35 on those MFs"? GB averages 24.7 PPG & PHI defense allows 18.6. Doesn't sound like a recipe for 28-35 points for GB. What am I missing? I'm looking at GB around 22 points.
Hope you are right, thought the same about Green Bay last week against Washington . These Packers have cost me too much this year, always thinking they will snap out of it. No play for me.^h
Hope you are right, thought the same about Green Bay last week against Washington . These Packers have cost me too much this year, always thinking they will snap out of it. No play for me.^h
This was one of the biggest market overreactions of the year.
The Redskins beat them 42-24, right?
Well.... Aaron Rodgers had them moving down the field at the end of the fourth with the game Was 35, GB 24. Fumble. Game. Then the Redskins get another runaway TD and make it look like the Packers are just awful.
Cue every media outlet, especially in the betting circuit, calling the Packers every name under the book. I heard Steve Fezzick call the Packers a lock to bet against every week because the team has quit, and all of this was based on the fact that the Packers didn't win the 4th Quarter.
Well, I got news for you, Steve Fezzick, the Packers, as bad as they've been, are not out of it. In fact, if they win tomorrow, they will be 5-6, Detroit is likely to fade (what a paper tiger), if the Lions lose against the Saints, The Vikings lose to the Cowboys and the Packers beat the Texans, we have a log-jam situation forming, with the Lions 7-5, the Packers 6-6, Vikings 6-6.
All things being equal, the Packers a game out with 4 games left, I take the Packers every time. Not out of it, the Packers know they're not out of it, and because of that, the Eagles are overrated by a full point.
This was one of the biggest market overreactions of the year.
The Redskins beat them 42-24, right?
Well.... Aaron Rodgers had them moving down the field at the end of the fourth with the game Was 35, GB 24. Fumble. Game. Then the Redskins get another runaway TD and make it look like the Packers are just awful.
Cue every media outlet, especially in the betting circuit, calling the Packers every name under the book. I heard Steve Fezzick call the Packers a lock to bet against every week because the team has quit, and all of this was based on the fact that the Packers didn't win the 4th Quarter.
Well, I got news for you, Steve Fezzick, the Packers, as bad as they've been, are not out of it. In fact, if they win tomorrow, they will be 5-6, Detroit is likely to fade (what a paper tiger), if the Lions lose against the Saints, The Vikings lose to the Cowboys and the Packers beat the Texans, we have a log-jam situation forming, with the Lions 7-5, the Packers 6-6, Vikings 6-6.
All things being equal, the Packers a game out with 4 games left, I take the Packers every time. Not out of it, the Packers know they're not out of it, and because of that, the Eagles are overrated by a full point.
Why should GB "hang 28-35 on those MFs"? GB averages 24.7 PPG & PHI defense allows 18.6. Doesn't sound like a recipe for 28-35 points for GB. What am I missing? I'm looking at GB around 22 points.
Green Bay can score and score fast from anywhere on the field .... they will stop philly run and make wentz turn over the ball
I'm not saying that this is a lock by any means but with these odds I will take my chances with a HOF qb
Why should GB "hang 28-35 on those MFs"? GB averages 24.7 PPG & PHI defense allows 18.6. Doesn't sound like a recipe for 28-35 points for GB. What am I missing? I'm looking at GB around 22 points.
Green Bay can score and score fast from anywhere on the field .... they will stop philly run and make wentz turn over the ball
I'm not saying that this is a lock by any means but with these odds I will take my chances with a HOF qb
How anyone could have ANY faith in this GB defense after the past few weeks is beyond comprehension. That defensive secondary couldn't stop a leaky toilet....worst in the NFL for sure.
How anyone could have ANY faith in this GB defense after the past few weeks is beyond comprehension. That defensive secondary couldn't stop a leaky toilet....worst in the NFL for sure.
GB 1-4 SU & 2-3 ATS on the road. PHI 4-0 SU & 4-0 ATS at home. & the matchup trends from here on covers:
Packers are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 games in November. Packers are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 games in Week 12. Packers are 0-3-1 ATS in their last 4 games after allowing more than 250 yards passing in their previous game.
Only trend in the packers favor is that head-to-head they're 4-1 ATS.
GB 1-4 SU & 2-3 ATS on the road. PHI 4-0 SU & 4-0 ATS at home. & the matchup trends from here on covers:
Packers are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 games in November. Packers are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 games in Week 12. Packers are 0-3-1 ATS in their last 4 games after allowing more than 250 yards passing in their previous game.
Only trend in the packers favor is that head-to-head they're 4-1 ATS.
This line is based on Philly's 4-0 home record. They have beaten Atlanta..Minny & Pitt all by greater than 9 points at home. GB is 1-4 on the road. Line is right where it should be -4 Philly
This line is based on Philly's 4-0 home record. They have beaten Atlanta..Minny & Pitt all by greater than 9 points at home. GB is 1-4 on the road. Line is right where it should be -4 Philly
Hard to trust GB lately but i tend to agree they could be the play in this spot. Wentz isn't the type of QB to throw darts down field to exploit the depleted secondary. They should hang around, GB teased to +11 and Over 40.5 could also be worth a look. BOL
Hard to trust GB lately but i tend to agree they could be the play in this spot. Wentz isn't the type of QB to throw darts down field to exploit the depleted secondary. They should hang around, GB teased to +11 and Over 40.5 could also be worth a look. BOL
I love the packers here, they lost their last 4 games in which all 4 winning team have elite QBs, matty ice, luck, mariotta (future pro bowl), and cousins
now they're facing a rookie QB, maybe slightly better than goff, see what happened in NO last nite!!! as long as GB not turning the ball over, I think they will be fine!!!!
I love the packers here, they lost their last 4 games in which all 4 winning team have elite QBs, matty ice, luck, mariotta (future pro bowl), and cousins
now they're facing a rookie QB, maybe slightly better than goff, see what happened in NO last nite!!! as long as GB not turning the ball over, I think they will be fine!!!!
I love the packers here, they lost their last 4 games in which all 4 winning team have elite QBs, matty ice, luck, mariotta (future pro bowl), and cousinsnow they're facing a rookie QB, maybe slightly better than goff, see what happened in NO last nite!!! as long as GB not turning the ball over, I think they will be fine!!!!
You could also say the same about the defenses that Packers faced. The four teams you mentioned have very poor defenses. Every single one of them do. Philly is stout on defense everywhere except for cornerback, and the Packers only seem to get yards through the air these days off of Rodgers scrambling and swing passes to Cobb/Montgomery. If anything I think we will see a Rodgers fumble or two swing the game.
I love the packers here, they lost their last 4 games in which all 4 winning team have elite QBs, matty ice, luck, mariotta (future pro bowl), and cousinsnow they're facing a rookie QB, maybe slightly better than goff, see what happened in NO last nite!!! as long as GB not turning the ball over, I think they will be fine!!!!
You could also say the same about the defenses that Packers faced. The four teams you mentioned have very poor defenses. Every single one of them do. Philly is stout on defense everywhere except for cornerback, and the Packers only seem to get yards through the air these days off of Rodgers scrambling and swing passes to Cobb/Montgomery. If anything I think we will see a Rodgers fumble or two swing the game.
I love the packers here, they lost their last 4 games in which all 4 winning team have elite QBs, matty ice, luck, mariotta (future pro bowl), and cousins
now they're facing a rookie QB, maybe slightly better than goff, see what happened in NO last nite!!! as long as GB not turning the ball over, I think they will be fine!!!!
GB has the weakest strength of schedule in the NFL.
I love the packers here, they lost their last 4 games in which all 4 winning team have elite QBs, matty ice, luck, mariotta (future pro bowl), and cousins
now they're facing a rookie QB, maybe slightly better than goff, see what happened in NO last nite!!! as long as GB not turning the ball over, I think they will be fine!!!!
GB has the weakest strength of schedule in the NFL.
BOL tonight guys love the insight from everyone , just remember when betting on a team the QB is the player who carries the most weight. I'll take Rodgers all day over wentz at plus points
BOL tonight guys love the insight from everyone , just remember when betting on a team the QB is the player who carries the most weight. I'll take Rodgers all day over wentz at plus points
BOL tonight guys love the insight from everyone , just remember when betting on a team the QB is the player who carries the most weight. I'll take Rodgers all day over wentz at plus points
BOL with ur bets. Should be an interesting MNF game.
BOL tonight guys love the insight from everyone , just remember when betting on a team the QB is the player who carries the most weight. I'll take Rodgers all day over wentz at plus points
BOL with ur bets. Should be an interesting MNF game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.