things changed last year all the hype is back on the thurs opener now so i say fade em 1st two games of year ! The Thurs nighter is now like the MON nighter was years ago !
SO watch out for Saints home opener vs Vikings if all the pre game hype is there like some band playing before game time
fade the high spread !
things changed last year all the hype is back on the thurs opener now so i say fade em 1st two games of year ! The Thurs nighter is now like the MON nighter was years ago !
SO watch out for Saints home opener vs Vikings if all the pre game hype is there like some band playing before game time
fade the high spread !
I had to take Vikes+4 anyway. They are 3-0 in L-3 regular season games in NO and only lost by 3 in the playoffs last season so I'm really liking the fact that the Vikes are getting +4 here. Good Luck
I had to take Vikes+4 anyway. They are 3-0 in L-3 regular season games in NO and only lost by 3 in the playoffs last season so I'm really liking the fact that the Vikes are getting +4 here. Good Luck
I had to take Vikes+4 anyway. They are 3-0 in L-3 regular season games in NO and only lost by 3 in the playoffs last season so I'm really liking the fact that the Vikes are getting +4 here. Good Luck
I had to take Vikes+4 anyway. They are 3-0 in L-3 regular season games in NO and only lost by 3 in the playoffs last season so I'm really liking the fact that the Vikes are getting +4 here. Good Luck
What emotion? Not like they got screwed on several calls. I am still pissed that this game was not in MIN (doesn't have to be week one as I can understand the first game being with the defending champs).
What emotion? Not like they got screwed on several calls. I am still pissed that this game was not in MIN (doesn't have to be week one as I can understand the first game being with the defending champs).
What emotion? Not like they got screwed on several calls. I am still pissed that this game was not in MIN (doesn't have to be week one as I can understand the first game being with the defending champs).
Get over it Jes, the Saints are the champs and i can't wait to send the troops out to get Brett one more time baby.
What emotion? Not like they got screwed on several calls. I am still pissed that this game was not in MIN (doesn't have to be week one as I can understand the first game being with the defending champs).
Get over it Jes, the Saints are the champs and i can't wait to send the troops out to get Brett one more time baby.
Hmmm, Past Super Bowl Champs, I might be wrong about this. Opening night something like 5-2, worst 5-3.ATS the last 7-8 years.
Favre, when does he hit the wall, no Henderson in the LB postion. No Chester Taylor, Is the cornerback Winfield----will he be totally healthy. Another negative is Childress, Yeah he's got them close, but IMO he's another Andy Reid, oh. didn't Childress come from Philly, maybe someone knows. The D dropped off from 2009 compared to 2008. Rice nagging injury since last year in the playoffs. Pat the fat cat Williams will be regulated to mostly non-passing situations-----thats what I read anyway. Saints have lost ------what maybe 1 player.
No doubt, better games to wager on Sunday. Just my 2 cents, I;ll either buy down to Saints- 2.5 or stay away. Yeah I know everyone will say that buying points is not worth it. I was 71-47 last year and 3rd place in the Hilton. Buying points with my 99 system is proven, it works for me guys.
Hmmm, Past Super Bowl Champs, I might be wrong about this. Opening night something like 5-2, worst 5-3.ATS the last 7-8 years.
Favre, when does he hit the wall, no Henderson in the LB postion. No Chester Taylor, Is the cornerback Winfield----will he be totally healthy. Another negative is Childress, Yeah he's got them close, but IMO he's another Andy Reid, oh. didn't Childress come from Philly, maybe someone knows. The D dropped off from 2009 compared to 2008. Rice nagging injury since last year in the playoffs. Pat the fat cat Williams will be regulated to mostly non-passing situations-----thats what I read anyway. Saints have lost ------what maybe 1 player.
No doubt, better games to wager on Sunday. Just my 2 cents, I;ll either buy down to Saints- 2.5 or stay away. Yeah I know everyone will say that buying points is not worth it. I was 71-47 last year and 3rd place in the Hilton. Buying points with my 99 system is proven, it works for me guys.
Hmmm, Past Super Bowl Champs, I might be wrong about this. Opening night something like 5-2, worst 5-3.ATS the last 7-8 years.
Favre, when does he hit the wall, no Henderson in the LB postion. No Chester Taylor, Is the cornerback Winfield----will he be totally healthy. Another negative is Childress, Yeah he's got them close, but IMO he's another Andy Reid, oh. didn't Childress come from Philly, maybe someone knows. The D dropped off from 2009 compared to 2008. Rice nagging injury since last year in the playoffs. Pat the fat cat Williams will be regulated to mostly non-passing situations-----thats what I read anyway. Saints have lost ------what maybe 1 player.
No doubt, better games to wager on Sunday. Just my 2 cents, I;ll either buy down to Saints- 2.5 or stay away. Yeah I know everyone will say that buying points is not worth it. I was 71-47 last year and 3rd place in the Hilton. Buying points with my 99 system is proven, it works for me guys.
EJ will be ready ("Minnesota Vikings linebacker E.J. Henderson is confident that he will be healed from a broken leg and ready to play when training camp starts in eight weeks" - ESPN Profile)
No Chester no problem... MIN drafted Toby Gehart and getting good reviews so far in mini camps. Remember MIN really just needs him to give the best RB in football a breather here and there and on third down passing situations which Toby is good at. I think you will find this to be a wash.
Winfield has missed 12 games over the past 3 years so like his injury issues haven't been a constant souce of problems that they have had to get over. I am certain that will continue this year as well. MIN has very good depth at this position for a reason. The bigger concern isn't Winfield but rather Cedrik Griffen. However, remember MIN signed Lito Sheppard too. So I think you are either misinformed or overemphasising this position.
Childress... cannot argue with you about him. He is perhaps one of the worst coaches in the NFL. The sooner he is out of MIN the better. I love it how he gets credit for their wins and ownership is a afraid to make any chances while they are doing well. As if the players give two $hits about Chilly. But it is what it is. I have always maintained though that there are three levels of coaching... very good, servicable and $hit. Not many very good, a fair amount of servicable and mostly $hit.
Don't see any nagging injuries regarding Syd Rice. If you are talking about his high ankle sprains that he played with during the playoff run I would like that several months of rest covers that issue. Whatever you are talking about should be a non issue.
Fat Pat will be in the game (barring suspension) on every non obvious passing down. He played 65% of the plays (or thereabouts) last year which is a good for a NT. So I don't understand how you think anything is going to change. And if it did by chance that would be at the discretion of the Vikings which means it was planned. Again don't understanding how this has anything to do with the game.
Ultimately tell me who the Vikings are missing that isn't planned or already replaced?
You can break it down anyway you want but I think you inclination of no play is right. If the Saints win it will be no more than a FG more than likely. So buying down to -2.5 could work but why not just play the +4? BOL!
Hmmm, Past Super Bowl Champs, I might be wrong about this. Opening night something like 5-2, worst 5-3.ATS the last 7-8 years.
Favre, when does he hit the wall, no Henderson in the LB postion. No Chester Taylor, Is the cornerback Winfield----will he be totally healthy. Another negative is Childress, Yeah he's got them close, but IMO he's another Andy Reid, oh. didn't Childress come from Philly, maybe someone knows. The D dropped off from 2009 compared to 2008. Rice nagging injury since last year in the playoffs. Pat the fat cat Williams will be regulated to mostly non-passing situations-----thats what I read anyway. Saints have lost ------what maybe 1 player.
No doubt, better games to wager on Sunday. Just my 2 cents, I;ll either buy down to Saints- 2.5 or stay away. Yeah I know everyone will say that buying points is not worth it. I was 71-47 last year and 3rd place in the Hilton. Buying points with my 99 system is proven, it works for me guys.
EJ will be ready ("Minnesota Vikings linebacker E.J. Henderson is confident that he will be healed from a broken leg and ready to play when training camp starts in eight weeks" - ESPN Profile)
No Chester no problem... MIN drafted Toby Gehart and getting good reviews so far in mini camps. Remember MIN really just needs him to give the best RB in football a breather here and there and on third down passing situations which Toby is good at. I think you will find this to be a wash.
Winfield has missed 12 games over the past 3 years so like his injury issues haven't been a constant souce of problems that they have had to get over. I am certain that will continue this year as well. MIN has very good depth at this position for a reason. The bigger concern isn't Winfield but rather Cedrik Griffen. However, remember MIN signed Lito Sheppard too. So I think you are either misinformed or overemphasising this position.
Childress... cannot argue with you about him. He is perhaps one of the worst coaches in the NFL. The sooner he is out of MIN the better. I love it how he gets credit for their wins and ownership is a afraid to make any chances while they are doing well. As if the players give two $hits about Chilly. But it is what it is. I have always maintained though that there are three levels of coaching... very good, servicable and $hit. Not many very good, a fair amount of servicable and mostly $hit.
Don't see any nagging injuries regarding Syd Rice. If you are talking about his high ankle sprains that he played with during the playoff run I would like that several months of rest covers that issue. Whatever you are talking about should be a non issue.
Fat Pat will be in the game (barring suspension) on every non obvious passing down. He played 65% of the plays (or thereabouts) last year which is a good for a NT. So I don't understand how you think anything is going to change. And if it did by chance that would be at the discretion of the Vikings which means it was planned. Again don't understanding how this has anything to do with the game.
Ultimately tell me who the Vikings are missing that isn't planned or already replaced?
You can break it down anyway you want but I think you inclination of no play is right. If the Saints win it will be no more than a FG more than likely. So buying down to -2.5 could work but why not just play the +4? BOL!
EJ will be ready ("Minnesota Vikings linebacker E.J. Henderson is confident that he will be healed from a broken leg and ready to play when training camp starts in eight weeks" - ESPN Profile)
No Chester no problem... MIN drafted Toby Gehart and getting good reviews so far in mini camps. Remember MIN really just needs him to give the best RB in football a breather here and there and on third down passing situations which Toby is good at. I think you will find this to be a wash.
Winfield has missed 12 games over the past 3 years so like his injury issues haven't been a constant souce of problems that they have had to get over. I am certain that will continue this year as well. MIN has very good depth at this position for a reason. The bigger concern isn't Winfield but rather Cedrik Griffen. However, remember MIN signed Lito Sheppard too. So I think you are either misinformed or overemphasising this position.
Childress... cannot argue with you about him. He is perhaps one of the worst coaches in the NFL. The sooner he is out of MIN the better. I love it how he gets credit for their wins and ownership is a afraid to make any chances while they are doing well. As if the players give two $hits about Chilly. But it is what it is. I have always maintained though that there are three levels of coaching... very good, servicable and $hit. Not many very good, a fair amount of servicable and mostly $hit.
Don't see any nagging injuries regarding Syd Rice. If you are talking about his high ankle sprains that he played with during the playoff run I would like that several months of rest covers that issue. Whatever you are talking about should be a non issue.
Fat Pat will be in the game (barring suspension) on every non obvious passing down. He played 65% of the plays (or thereabouts) last year which is a good for a NT. So I don't understand how you think anything is going to change. And if it did by chance that would be at the discretion of the Vikings which means it was planned. Again don't understanding how this has anything to do with the game.
Ultimately tell me who the Vikings are missing that isn't planned or already replaced?
You can break it down anyway you want but I think you inclination of no play is right. If the Saints win it will be no more than a FG more than likely. So buying down to -2.5 could work but why not just play the +4? BOL!
Guess you missed rice's agent confirming minor surgery on his groin, and lingering hip injury from the playoffs.
seems to me that when winfield tweaked his ankle at home against the Ravens, when he didn't return for the 2nd half the Ravens with little or no go to wide receivers scorched the back ups.
Henderson says he feels confident, yeah well whats he going to say-------no I feel like shit. Broken leg------is he going to be 100%, we'll see.
Stats are stats-------the defense last year wasn't as good as 08
You had no comment on Favre, I think the guy is one of the best to play the game, BTW----you have to ask yourself, ankle surgery.
TG as a rookie, yeah he might be all that and probably will have a nice game. The first game out of the box?
Why wouldn't I take the +4. The same reason I had the Saints-2.5 last year. I bought 1 point last year.
sounds to me like you're a Viking fan. I have no interest in any of the 32 teams. Simply on the team(s) I think will cover.
EJ will be ready ("Minnesota Vikings linebacker E.J. Henderson is confident that he will be healed from a broken leg and ready to play when training camp starts in eight weeks" - ESPN Profile)
No Chester no problem... MIN drafted Toby Gehart and getting good reviews so far in mini camps. Remember MIN really just needs him to give the best RB in football a breather here and there and on third down passing situations which Toby is good at. I think you will find this to be a wash.
Winfield has missed 12 games over the past 3 years so like his injury issues haven't been a constant souce of problems that they have had to get over. I am certain that will continue this year as well. MIN has very good depth at this position for a reason. The bigger concern isn't Winfield but rather Cedrik Griffen. However, remember MIN signed Lito Sheppard too. So I think you are either misinformed or overemphasising this position.
Childress... cannot argue with you about him. He is perhaps one of the worst coaches in the NFL. The sooner he is out of MIN the better. I love it how he gets credit for their wins and ownership is a afraid to make any chances while they are doing well. As if the players give two $hits about Chilly. But it is what it is. I have always maintained though that there are three levels of coaching... very good, servicable and $hit. Not many very good, a fair amount of servicable and mostly $hit.
Don't see any nagging injuries regarding Syd Rice. If you are talking about his high ankle sprains that he played with during the playoff run I would like that several months of rest covers that issue. Whatever you are talking about should be a non issue.
Fat Pat will be in the game (barring suspension) on every non obvious passing down. He played 65% of the plays (or thereabouts) last year which is a good for a NT. So I don't understand how you think anything is going to change. And if it did by chance that would be at the discretion of the Vikings which means it was planned. Again don't understanding how this has anything to do with the game.
Ultimately tell me who the Vikings are missing that isn't planned or already replaced?
You can break it down anyway you want but I think you inclination of no play is right. If the Saints win it will be no more than a FG more than likely. So buying down to -2.5 could work but why not just play the +4? BOL!
Guess you missed rice's agent confirming minor surgery on his groin, and lingering hip injury from the playoffs.
seems to me that when winfield tweaked his ankle at home against the Ravens, when he didn't return for the 2nd half the Ravens with little or no go to wide receivers scorched the back ups.
Henderson says he feels confident, yeah well whats he going to say-------no I feel like shit. Broken leg------is he going to be 100%, we'll see.
Stats are stats-------the defense last year wasn't as good as 08
You had no comment on Favre, I think the guy is one of the best to play the game, BTW----you have to ask yourself, ankle surgery.
TG as a rookie, yeah he might be all that and probably will have a nice game. The first game out of the box?
Why wouldn't I take the +4. The same reason I had the Saints-2.5 last year. I bought 1 point last year.
sounds to me like you're a Viking fan. I have no interest in any of the 32 teams. Simply on the team(s) I think will cover.
Did you not see the other 3 reasons listed or are you just a simpleton?
The Vikings with pretty much the same defense has played the Saints in the dome the past 2 years. They simply cannot stop the Saints offense and had trouble stopping them both times. Add to that the Saints should have a few more weapons this time around (Heath Evans back from injury, rookie Jimmy Graham). More size at RB. The WW also got manhandled on a few run plays in the NFCCG. Saints interior line >>> WW.
Defensively the Saints have added more speed and hopefully more disciplined end play against the cut back run.
Saints week 1, ML LOCK. I'd also be willing to lay points up to 5.5...meaning I'll most likely be chalking this one.
Did you not see the other 3 reasons listed or are you just a simpleton?
The Vikings with pretty much the same defense has played the Saints in the dome the past 2 years. They simply cannot stop the Saints offense and had trouble stopping them both times. Add to that the Saints should have a few more weapons this time around (Heath Evans back from injury, rookie Jimmy Graham). More size at RB. The WW also got manhandled on a few run plays in the NFCCG. Saints interior line >>> WW.
Defensively the Saints have added more speed and hopefully more disciplined end play against the cut back run.
Saints week 1, ML LOCK. I'd also be willing to lay points up to 5.5...meaning I'll most likely be chalking this one.
Wize
Wize
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.