But Something tells me Spurs are gonna roll with 6-9 pt win. Grizzlies look lost, I know its only game 1 but SA can do whatever they want
Past 2 years there have been 5 teams win game 1 by 18 pts or more and they are 1-4 ATS in game 2..............................................
Not very wise to play teams off big wins.
Past 2 years there have been 5 teams win game 1 by 18 pts or more and they are 1-4 ATS in game 2..............................................
Not very wise to play teams off big wins.
Past 2 years there have been 5 teams win game 1 by 18 pts or more and they are 1-4 ATS in game 2..............................................
Not very wise to play teams off big wins.
Past 2 years there have been 5 teams win game 1 by 18 pts or more and they are 1-4 ATS in game 2..............................................
Not very wise to play teams off big wins.
Past 2 years there have been 5 teams win game 1 by 18 pts or more and they are 1-4 ATS in game 2..............................................
Not very wise to play teams off big wins.
Past 2 years there have been 5 teams win game 1 by 18 pts or more and they are 1-4 ATS in game 2..............................................
Not very wise to play teams off big wins.
I like to say, people bend and twist info to fit their perceptions.
Basically for the purpose of renforcing their perceptions.
Which is backwards of good analysis. One should let the info shape and form their perceptions, it's a very fine line.
History tells us teams off big wins is not a smart play.
In the past 2 years teams off 15 pt wins or better in game 1 when covering the spread by at least 10 pts are 2-6 ATS in game 2.
The reason covering the spread by 10 or more is important is you want teams who beat the expectations by a large amount therefore effecting people's perceptions.
A team winning by 16 that was a 13.5 favorite did about what was expected, but a team that wins by 15 as a 4.5 favorite would be looked at by the public different............................................................
I like to say, people bend and twist info to fit their perceptions.
Basically for the purpose of renforcing their perceptions.
Which is backwards of good analysis. One should let the info shape and form their perceptions, it's a very fine line.
History tells us teams off big wins is not a smart play.
In the past 2 years teams off 15 pt wins or better in game 1 when covering the spread by at least 10 pts are 2-6 ATS in game 2.
The reason covering the spread by 10 or more is important is you want teams who beat the expectations by a large amount therefore effecting people's perceptions.
A team winning by 16 that was a 13.5 favorite did about what was expected, but a team that wins by 15 as a 4.5 favorite would be looked at by the public different............................................................
I like to say, people bend and twist info to fit their perceptions.
Basically for the purpose of renforcing their perceptions.
Which is backwards of good analysis. One should let the info shape and form their perceptions, it's a very fine line.
History tells us teams off big wins is not a smart play.
In the past 2 years teams off 15 pt wins or better in game 1 when covering the spread by at least 10 pts are 2-6 ATS in game 2.
The reason covering the spread by 10 or more is important is you want teams who beat the expectations by a large amount therefore effecting people's perceptions.
A team winning by 16 that was a 13.5 favorite did about what was expected, but a team that wins by 15 as a 4.5 favorite would be looked at by the public different............................................................
I like to say, people bend and twist info to fit their perceptions.
Basically for the purpose of renforcing their perceptions.
Which is backwards of good analysis. One should let the info shape and form their perceptions, it's a very fine line.
History tells us teams off big wins is not a smart play.
In the past 2 years teams off 15 pt wins or better in game 1 when covering the spread by at least 10 pts are 2-6 ATS in game 2.
The reason covering the spread by 10 or more is important is you want teams who beat the expectations by a large amount therefore effecting people's perceptions.
A team winning by 16 that was a 13.5 favorite did about what was expected, but a team that wins by 15 as a 4.5 favorite would be looked at by the public different............................................................
I like to say, people bend and twist info to fit their perceptions.
Basically for the purpose of renforcing their perceptions.
Which is backwards of good analysis. One should let the info shape and form their perceptions, it's a very fine line.
History tells us teams off big wins is not a smart play.
In the past 2 years teams off 15 pt wins or better in game 1 when covering the spread by at least 10 pts are 2-6 ATS in game 2.
The reason covering the spread by 10 or more is important is you want teams who beat the expectations by a large amount therefore effecting people's perceptions.
A team winning by 16 that was a 13.5 favorite did about what was expected, but a team that wins by 15 as a 4.5 favorite would be looked at by the public different............................................................
I like to say, people bend and twist info to fit their perceptions.
Basically for the purpose of renforcing their perceptions.
Which is backwards of good analysis. One should let the info shape and form their perceptions, it's a very fine line.
History tells us teams off big wins is not a smart play.
In the past 2 years teams off 15 pt wins or better in game 1 when covering the spread by at least 10 pts are 2-6 ATS in game 2.
The reason covering the spread by 10 or more is important is you want teams who beat the expectations by a large amount therefore effecting people's perceptions.
A team winning by 16 that was a 13.5 favorite did about what was expected, but a team that wins by 15 as a 4.5 favorite would be looked at by the public different............................................................
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.