Agree, UGA will take the anger from last week's embarrassment out on a hapless Vandy. Commodores have no offense, especially passing which is what is needed to keep the ball away. Vandy defense is decent, but will wear down. No homefield advantage for Vandy in good years, should be worse this year with the start they have had. Look for the Dawgs to roll by 3 TDs. Wouldn't play the O/U, but if I did it would be the dreaded under....which I hate to bet.
Agree, UGA will take the anger from last week's embarrassment out on a hapless Vandy. Commodores have no offense, especially passing which is what is needed to keep the ball away. Vandy defense is decent, but will wear down. No homefield advantage for Vandy in good years, should be worse this year with the start they have had. Look for the Dawgs to roll by 3 TDs. Wouldn't play the O/U, but if I did it would be the dreaded under....which I hate to bet.
84% on UGA yet the line has moved DOWN ?? 98% on UGA ML too. Wonder why the RLM ? I may stay away from this one. With Mr. Martinez's dynamic Defense,u never can tell. Hesistant to invest in Very popular large road favs.
84% on UGA yet the line has moved DOWN ?? 98% on UGA ML too. Wonder why the RLM ? I may stay away from this one. With Mr. Martinez's dynamic Defense,u never can tell. Hesistant to invest in Very popular large road favs.
84% on UGA yet the line has moved DOWN ?? 98% on UGA ML too. Wonder why the RLM ? I may stay away from this one. With Mr. Martinez's dynamic Defense,u never can tell. Hesistant to invest in Very popular large road favs.
84% on UGA yet the line has moved DOWN ?? 98% on UGA ML too. Wonder why the RLM ? I may stay away from this one. With Mr. Martinez's dynamic Defense,u never can tell. Hesistant to invest in Very popular large road favs.
Most times Georgia would look like the easy play, except Georgia is rediculously bad at covering a spread, no matter who it's against, or what the spread is.
Something to the tune of 3-12 ATS in their last 15. I've made the mistake twice this year, and no way in hell will I take Georgia to cover for the next 2 years.
Most times Georgia would look like the easy play, except Georgia is rediculously bad at covering a spread, no matter who it's against, or what the spread is.
Something to the tune of 3-12 ATS in their last 15. I've made the mistake twice this year, and no way in hell will I take Georgia to cover for the next 2 years.
Interesting game with an interesting spread. Georgia with obviously more to lose in this one. Vanderbilt is one of the SEC spoilers of recent years including Kentucky, South Carolina, and Ole Miss (which has been a sore disappointment thus far). Thus, I like to think Vandy can get it done. However, I think Georgia's defense is a little too much to handle for Vandy. Georgia will get their points. So I like Georgia, and I don't think it to be unwise to put a big sum on it. Georgia -7.5
Interesting game with an interesting spread. Georgia with obviously more to lose in this one. Vanderbilt is one of the SEC spoilers of recent years including Kentucky, South Carolina, and Ole Miss (which has been a sore disappointment thus far). Thus, I like to think Vandy can get it done. However, I think Georgia's defense is a little too much to handle for Vandy. Georgia will get their points. So I like Georgia, and I don't think it to be unwise to put a big sum on it. Georgia -7.5
Georgia is slightly over 51% ATS for the past nine years in all games. Maybe this team will continue to disappoint, but 51% is pretty much the norm for goos college teams. Only one school, Boise State is over 60% for this same time period. What all that says is, if you want to make money (hit over 55%) you have to select the right games for ALL teams because no one team is predictable over the long haul. There actually are teams that are pretty good to bet against, but no one that dominates by covering the spreads. Someone took the time to compile all of that. Take a look at the site for all the information (free):
thechampionshipissue.blogspot.com
Be warned though, the guy did a nice job putting this together but he is horrible picking games. Still taking UGA and laying the points. Medium play.
Quote Originally Posted by huskeralum09:
Most times Georgia would look like the easy play, except Georgia is rediculously bad at covering a spread, no matter who it's against, or what the spread is.
Something to the tune of 3-12 ATS in their last 15. I've made the mistake twice this year, and no way in hell will I take Georgia to cover for the next 2 years.
Georgia is slightly over 51% ATS for the past nine years in all games. Maybe this team will continue to disappoint, but 51% is pretty much the norm for goos college teams. Only one school, Boise State is over 60% for this same time period. What all that says is, if you want to make money (hit over 55%) you have to select the right games for ALL teams because no one team is predictable over the long haul. There actually are teams that are pretty good to bet against, but no one that dominates by covering the spreads. Someone took the time to compile all of that. Take a look at the site for all the information (free):
thechampionshipissue.blogspot.com
Be warned though, the guy did a nice job putting this together but he is horrible picking games. Still taking UGA and laying the points. Medium play.
Quote Originally Posted by huskeralum09:
Most times Georgia would look like the easy play, except Georgia is rediculously bad at covering a spread, no matter who it's against, or what the spread is.
Something to the tune of 3-12 ATS in their last 15. I've made the mistake twice this year, and no way in hell will I take Georgia to cover for the next 2 years.
I've been fading my Dawgs for weeks, but I really think this is the spot to take them. They don't cover well, which is because they started the season overrated and they've played several teams that were more talented and better coached. However, Vandy doesn't match up well and if there is a team in the SEC that is worse than UGA, it is Vandy. Obviously the public still likes UGA, as indicated by the betting %. I think this is the week that UGA backers get rewarded. I like them to cover the game spread and love them to cover the 1h spread with ease. My only concern with the game line is a late moose job spoiler, but I see UGA getting a fast start out of the gate. UGA -7.5 5 units UGA -5 1h 10 units
I've been fading my Dawgs for weeks, but I really think this is the spot to take them. They don't cover well, which is because they started the season overrated and they've played several teams that were more talented and better coached. However, Vandy doesn't match up well and if there is a team in the SEC that is worse than UGA, it is Vandy. Obviously the public still likes UGA, as indicated by the betting %. I think this is the week that UGA backers get rewarded. I like them to cover the game spread and love them to cover the 1h spread with ease. My only concern with the game line is a late moose job spoiler, but I see UGA getting a fast start out of the gate. UGA -7.5 5 units UGA -5 1h 10 units
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.