Home court advantage with their backs against the wall is a huge edge for Oregon. Add to that Creighton's road record and the Ducks get the edge.
All that being said, I am still not ready to pull the trigger. 4.5 is alot to give a team that is one win away from a championship. I will have to ponder this one a little longer...
Home court advantage with their backs against the wall is a huge edge for Oregon. Add to that Creighton's road record and the Ducks get the edge.
All that being said, I am still not ready to pull the trigger. 4.5 is alot to give a team that is one win away from a championship. I will have to ponder this one a little longer...
i'm adding Creighton to my parlay with Santa Clara. I got burned with Oregon last game, and I think Creighton is just too big for the Ducks based on their last performance
i'm adding Creighton to my parlay with Santa Clara. I got burned with Oregon last game, and I think Creighton is just too big for the Ducks based on their last performance
This is an easy one fellas. If you watched the first game you realize the play is the over. F the side. Ducks have to win for a game three right? Just OVER.
This is an easy one fellas. If you watched the first game you realize the play is the over. F the side. Ducks have to win for a game three right? Just OVER.
This is an easy one fellas. If you watched the first game you realize the play is the over. F the side. Ducks have to win for a game three right? Just OVER.
This is an easy one fellas. If you watched the first game you realize the play is the over. F the side. Ducks have to win for a game three right? Just OVER.
I'm an against the trend bettor or a contrarian, whatever you want to call it. If I see a team has gone over for 5 straight games, I bet the under expecting Vegas to have the total really high since the last 5 games went over....but this line adjustment just doesn't seem to happen very often. Creighton is running up and down the court shooting 3s left and right and Vegas still comes in with 146.5?!?!
This total should be 160 based on how these teams play and past results!! Why does Vegas make it so easy for the square bettor to take the over here?
Screw it, I'm still going under. If it was as easy as looking at the last 5 games and saying "man they score a lot of points, so I think it will happen again"...vegas would be out of business...but they are not and they continue to make money.
I'm an against the trend bettor or a contrarian, whatever you want to call it. If I see a team has gone over for 5 straight games, I bet the under expecting Vegas to have the total really high since the last 5 games went over....but this line adjustment just doesn't seem to happen very often. Creighton is running up and down the court shooting 3s left and right and Vegas still comes in with 146.5?!?!
This total should be 160 based on how these teams play and past results!! Why does Vegas make it so easy for the square bettor to take the over here?
Screw it, I'm still going under. If it was as easy as looking at the last 5 games and saying "man they score a lot of points, so I think it will happen again"...vegas would be out of business...but they are not and they continue to make money.
I'm an against the trend bettor or a contrarian, whatever you want to call it. If I see a team has gone over for 5 straight games, I bet the under expecting Vegas to have the total really high since the last 5 games went over....but this line adjustment just doesn't seem to happen very often. Creighton is running up and down the court shooting 3s left and right and Vegas still comes in with 146.5?!?!
This total should be 160 based on how these teams play and past results!! Why does Vegas make it so easy for the square bettor to take the over here?
Screw it, I'm still going under. If it was as easy as looking at the last 5 games and saying "man they score a lot of points, so I think it will happen again"...vegas would be out of business...but they are not and they continue to make money.
I'm an against the trend bettor or a contrarian, whatever you want to call it. If I see a team has gone over for 5 straight games, I bet the under expecting Vegas to have the total really high since the last 5 games went over....but this line adjustment just doesn't seem to happen very often. Creighton is running up and down the court shooting 3s left and right and Vegas still comes in with 146.5?!?!
This total should be 160 based on how these teams play and past results!! Why does Vegas make it so easy for the square bettor to take the over here?
Screw it, I'm still going under. If it was as easy as looking at the last 5 games and saying "man they score a lot of points, so I think it will happen again"...vegas would be out of business...but they are not and they continue to make money.
Decided. Jays plus the chalk. They might not win only because of the fact that the Ducks are against the wall but in the end I am hoping for a non-free throw situation and a close game.
I'll take the better team plus the points & hope for the best!!
Decided. Jays plus the chalk. They might not win only because of the fact that the Ducks are against the wall but in the end I am hoping for a non-free throw situation and a close game.
I'll take the better team plus the points & hope for the best!!
I'm an against the trend bettor or a contrarian, whatever you want to call it. If I see a team has gone over for 5 straight games, I bet the under expecting Vegas to have the total really high since the last 5 games went over....but this line adjustment just doesn't seem to happen very often. Creighton is running up and down the court shooting 3s left and right and Vegas still comes in with 146.5?!?!
This total should be 160 based on how these teams play and past results!! Why does Vegas make it so easy for the square bettor to take the over here?
Screw it, I'm still going under. If it was as easy as looking at the last 5 games and saying "man they score a lot of points, so I think it will happen again"...vegas would be out of business...but they are not and they continue to make money.
I'm an against the trend bettor or a contrarian, whatever you want to call it. If I see a team has gone over for 5 straight games, I bet the under expecting Vegas to have the total really high since the last 5 games went over....but this line adjustment just doesn't seem to happen very often. Creighton is running up and down the court shooting 3s left and right and Vegas still comes in with 146.5?!?!
This total should be 160 based on how these teams play and past results!! Why does Vegas make it so easy for the square bettor to take the over here?
Screw it, I'm still going under. If it was as easy as looking at the last 5 games and saying "man they score a lot of points, so I think it will happen again"...vegas would be out of business...but they are not and they continue to make money.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.