Colorado State@Nevada: This favors CSU by double digits almost every time in a game that hits right around 133. This is favoring the Rams ability to score and up tick of recent trends in rebounding as well as the recent trend of keeping opponents to 60.7 ppg vs Nevada's lack of defense in recent trend giving up more than 68 ppg and averaging only 59.3 ppg on the scoring side.
Colorado State@Nevada: This favors CSU by double digits almost every time in a game that hits right around 133. This is favoring the Rams ability to score and up tick of recent trends in rebounding as well as the recent trend of keeping opponents to 60.7 ppg vs Nevada's lack of defense in recent trend giving up more than 68 ppg and averaging only 59.3 ppg on the scoring side.
Sacred Heart +5 @Bryant: This favors an outright win for Sacred Heart due to the uptick of trends in scoring ppg, rebounding per game, and Shooting efficiency where they are averaging 82.3 ppg, 42.3 rbg, and shooting at 54.1%. My own personal opinion is that I like this game as well. Sacred Heart has already beaten Bryant twice this year. Beating them in Bryant 83-66 and then beating them at home in overtime 84-75. Sacred Heart plays zero defense but has a huge advantage on the offensive side as they can score boat loads of points. Bryant averages around 68.1 at home. This seems to fit the bill and if Bryant does win, I still think it stays within 5 points.
Sacred Heart +5 @Bryant: This favors an outright win for Sacred Heart due to the uptick of trends in scoring ppg, rebounding per game, and Shooting efficiency where they are averaging 82.3 ppg, 42.3 rbg, and shooting at 54.1%. My own personal opinion is that I like this game as well. Sacred Heart has already beaten Bryant twice this year. Beating them in Bryant 83-66 and then beating them at home in overtime 84-75. Sacred Heart plays zero defense but has a huge advantage on the offensive side as they can score boat loads of points. Bryant averages around 68.1 at home. This seems to fit the bill and if Bryant does win, I still think it stays within 5 points.
IMAUNIT: Both games are giving me mixed results. I would tread lightly with Illinois. Nebraska has the talent to beat Illinois but it is all depending on which Huskers team you get on any given day. Huskers already beat them by 10 earlier and with the mixed results I would stay away. About half the time Illinois comes out as 8.5 winners. Might want to look at a 1h play. Ohio State almost covers this everytime according to what I get, but this is where my personal opinion comes in and Penn State is a covering machine. I would like to think Michigan State pulls it off, but nothing is jumping out at me For either team.
IMAUNIT: Both games are giving me mixed results. I would tread lightly with Illinois. Nebraska has the talent to beat Illinois but it is all depending on which Huskers team you get on any given day. Huskers already beat them by 10 earlier and with the mixed results I would stay away. About half the time Illinois comes out as 8.5 winners. Might want to look at a 1h play. Ohio State almost covers this everytime according to what I get, but this is where my personal opinion comes in and Penn State is a covering machine. I would like to think Michigan State pulls it off, but nothing is jumping out at me For either team.
Undermysac: I look at this after lunch. I have an 11 meeting and then about a 30 minute drive back to the office. Intriguing is the right word and the first time I looked I messed up with using Penn State vs Mich State instead of Purdue so those results are obviously not going to work.
Undermysac: I look at this after lunch. I have an 11 meeting and then about a 30 minute drive back to the office. Intriguing is the right word and the first time I looked I messed up with using Penn State vs Mich State instead of Purdue so those results are obviously not going to work.
One note for the day: I am getting big results for HartFord to cover the +7 spread pretty easily. Almost too good to be true results. Under my own looking, the last 3 games have been either decided in OT or by 1 point which makes me want to go Hartford, but like I said almost too good to be true. Any info you guys got would be much appreciated on this game.
One note for the day: I am getting big results for HartFord to cover the +7 spread pretty easily. Almost too good to be true results. Under my own looking, the last 3 games have been either decided in OT or by 1 point which makes me want to go Hartford, but like I said almost too good to be true. Any info you guys got would be much appreciated on this game.
Ok. Thanks for the time man. I appreciate it. the mixed results that your getting must be what is throwing my numbers off. I have both of those games as really good picks. or it might be my handicapping is hogwash.
Ok. Thanks for the time man. I appreciate it. the mixed results that your getting must be what is throwing my numbers off. I have both of those games as really good picks. or it might be my handicapping is hogwash.
Undermysac: Purdue@Mich St: Mixed results and showing Purdue covering a lot more than you would think. It is favoring Purdue's recent trends in their boost of ppg (73.3), Offensive Efficiency (1.041), and Defensive efficiency (1.017) vs Mich St decline of ppg (70.3), decline of points against (72.3) when they have averaged holding opponents to 61.5 through the season. That's a big difference. And also their defensive efficiency has declined at home down to .889. On the other side, when Mich St is favored it is solely looking at offensive efficiency (1.075) vs how many points Purdue has been allowing in recent trends (71 ppg) One I'm not personally going to play but you also have to factor in home court, senior night, etc. Good Luck with your play...hope some of that helps or gives you another angle anyways.
Other stats to further complicate things: Purdue 5-0 ATS in roadies and 23-8 ATS in last 31. Mich St 1-5 ATS in last 6 at home. You would be playing against a covering beast, but Mich St owns Purdue ATS with 6-0 in last 6 games between the two.
Undermysac: Purdue@Mich St: Mixed results and showing Purdue covering a lot more than you would think. It is favoring Purdue's recent trends in their boost of ppg (73.3), Offensive Efficiency (1.041), and Defensive efficiency (1.017) vs Mich St decline of ppg (70.3), decline of points against (72.3) when they have averaged holding opponents to 61.5 through the season. That's a big difference. And also their defensive efficiency has declined at home down to .889. On the other side, when Mich St is favored it is solely looking at offensive efficiency (1.075) vs how many points Purdue has been allowing in recent trends (71 ppg) One I'm not personally going to play but you also have to factor in home court, senior night, etc. Good Luck with your play...hope some of that helps or gives you another angle anyways.
Other stats to further complicate things: Purdue 5-0 ATS in roadies and 23-8 ATS in last 31. Mich St 1-5 ATS in last 6 at home. You would be playing against a covering beast, but Mich St owns Purdue ATS with 6-0 in last 6 games between the two.
The one game I was worried about showed up as a play: LSU -7/Tennessee: This favors a double digit win for LSU for their huge advantage on the rebounding and blocking side as well as their big uptick in recent trends with scoring (75.7ppg), holding oppenents to 62.3 ppg and big jump on Off. Efficiency to 1.042 Vs Tennessees decline in scoring (57 ppg recent trend), increase in points given up (66ppg), and rebounding difference. In laments terms this is saying LSU's 7th ranked rebounding and 7th ranked blocking against Tennessee's 25th ranked rebounding and 15th ranking blocking will be far too much for Vols on LSU turf. This is also showing the overs barely making it at 134 but I don't mess with them.
The one game I was worried about showed up as a play: LSU -7/Tennessee: This favors a double digit win for LSU for their huge advantage on the rebounding and blocking side as well as their big uptick in recent trends with scoring (75.7ppg), holding oppenents to 62.3 ppg and big jump on Off. Efficiency to 1.042 Vs Tennessees decline in scoring (57 ppg recent trend), increase in points given up (66ppg), and rebounding difference. In laments terms this is saying LSU's 7th ranked rebounding and 7th ranked blocking against Tennessee's 25th ranked rebounding and 15th ranking blocking will be far too much for Vols on LSU turf. This is also showing the overs barely making it at 134 but I don't mess with them.
Also showing St.Johns to blow Marquette out of the water by 13+ but something is super fishy about that -2 line. Even at home, that line makes zero sense. Careful.
Also showing St.Johns to blow Marquette out of the water by 13+ but something is super fishy about that -2 line. Even at home, that line makes zero sense. Careful.
Yea, little known fact, I love the way LSU plays basketball and love playing them. Thats why i said it was the onebthat worried me. Their style is aggressive and fierce. Always pisses me off when they are a let down because they are a huge let down whenever that is.
Yea, little known fact, I love the way LSU plays basketball and love playing them. Thats why i said it was the onebthat worried me. Their style is aggressive and fierce. Always pisses me off when they are a let down because they are a huge let down whenever that is.
GCY, what do you think about Oregon vs Oregon State? Line seems super fishy at -1. Oregon is on a roll and Oregon State has lost 5 of their last 6. I know its a rivalry, but Oregon would seem like a no brainer.
GCY, what do you think about Oregon vs Oregon State? Line seems super fishy at -1. Oregon is on a roll and Oregon State has lost 5 of their last 6. I know its a rivalry, but Oregon would seem like a no brainer.
Wilson I get this game almost right on the nose at mostly Oregon between 2 and 4 points. I hate making plays on games that close to the actual line and the numbers are tight because of Oregon forgetting to play defense on the road (gives up 77.5 ppg on road) matched with the defensive ability of Oregon State defense at home which is much better than on the road ( only gives up 51.9 ppg at home average over season). That's what is making it so close. Oregon has a huge rebounding advantage (35.7 vs 24.7) so this is all depending on Oregon's defense in the rivarly. Scary game for me. Could be a blow out and could be really close until the end.
Wilson I get this game almost right on the nose at mostly Oregon between 2 and 4 points. I hate making plays on games that close to the actual line and the numbers are tight because of Oregon forgetting to play defense on the road (gives up 77.5 ppg on road) matched with the defensive ability of Oregon State defense at home which is much better than on the road ( only gives up 51.9 ppg at home average over season). That's what is making it so close. Oregon has a huge rebounding advantage (35.7 vs 24.7) so this is all depending on Oregon's defense in the rivarly. Scary game for me. Could be a blow out and could be really close until the end.
Thanks for posting cap, good stuff on purdue/mich st game. Purdue has done well for me this yr. Love their bigs. I see a physical close game and lots of time on the free throw line for both teams. I'll take purdue and the 7 points. GL w/ the tourney.
Thanks for posting cap, good stuff on purdue/mich st game. Purdue has done well for me this yr. Love their bigs. I see a physical close game and lots of time on the free throw line for both teams. I'll take purdue and the 7 points. GL w/ the tourney.
IMAUNIT: Both games are giving me mixed results. I would tread lightly with Illinois. Nebraska has the talent to beat Illinois but it is all depending on which Huskers team you get on any given day. Huskers already beat them by 10 earlier and with the mixed results I would stay away. About half the time Illinois comes out as 8.5 winners. Might want to look at a 1h play. Ohio State almost covers this everytime according to what I get, but this is where my personal opinion comes in and Penn State is a covering machine. I would like to think Michigan State pulls it off, but nothing is jumping out at me For either team.
I disagree with Penn St being a covering machine. They are 12-15 ATS overall; 6-7 ATS after a loss; 7-7 ATS at home; 9-7 ATS in conference matchups; and 8-9 ATS with 2-3 days rest. According to my numbers, I have Ohio State covering the -6.
IMAUNIT: Both games are giving me mixed results. I would tread lightly with Illinois. Nebraska has the talent to beat Illinois but it is all depending on which Huskers team you get on any given day. Huskers already beat them by 10 earlier and with the mixed results I would stay away. About half the time Illinois comes out as 8.5 winners. Might want to look at a 1h play. Ohio State almost covers this everytime according to what I get, but this is where my personal opinion comes in and Penn State is a covering machine. I would like to think Michigan State pulls it off, but nothing is jumping out at me For either team.
I disagree with Penn St being a covering machine. They are 12-15 ATS overall; 6-7 ATS after a loss; 7-7 ATS at home; 9-7 ATS in conference matchups; and 8-9 ATS with 2-3 days rest. According to my numbers, I have Ohio State covering the -6.
Steam I hate when you ask me that because I feel like I have got my a$$ handed to me after I answer this exact questio on the other threads you've asked...lol Jk. The plays I'm tracking are the ones that I just post outright and not the ones I ahave nswered for anyone. So Colorado St, Sacred Heart, and LSU.
Also if you are tracking everything Steam, Although I would not play them because of the mixed results but it favors Louisville, Oregon, providence, and Utah State to all cover tonight as well. If I were playing I'd probably put a small amount on the points with Utah State as I like the way they play.
And technically record of posted plays on here would end up being 98-66-3 ytd correct? Or is it 99? That's adding the 6-1 the last two nights even though I am personally not playing them but still posting them.
Steam I hate when you ask me that because I feel like I have got my a$$ handed to me after I answer this exact questio on the other threads you've asked...lol Jk. The plays I'm tracking are the ones that I just post outright and not the ones I ahave nswered for anyone. So Colorado St, Sacred Heart, and LSU.
Also if you are tracking everything Steam, Although I would not play them because of the mixed results but it favors Louisville, Oregon, providence, and Utah State to all cover tonight as well. If I were playing I'd probably put a small amount on the points with Utah State as I like the way they play.
And technically record of posted plays on here would end up being 98-66-3 ytd correct? Or is it 99? That's adding the 6-1 the last two nights even though I am personally not playing them but still posting them.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.