almost had a sweep yesterday but marquette loses by a last second bucket. fuckin' big east... they are to college basketball what mac is to college football
michigan st +4 (5u) - watch for an outright win
george washington +8
i'm breaking one of my rules - don't bet syracuse sports. only reason i'm doing it is because miami had a grueling game against nc st on saturday, to quickly turn around and have to grind out another against 'cuse. they shouldn't have trouble against the zone but i'm not sure they'll give 100% effort to cover 7. cuse +7
looking over some more. good luck!
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
almost had a sweep yesterday but marquette loses by a last second bucket. fuckin' big east... they are to college basketball what mac is to college football
michigan st +4 (5u) - watch for an outright win
george washington +8
i'm breaking one of my rules - don't bet syracuse sports. only reason i'm doing it is because miami had a grueling game against nc st on saturday, to quickly turn around and have to grind out another against 'cuse. they shouldn't have trouble against the zone but i'm not sure they'll give 100% effort to cover 7. cuse +7
Purdue is really undervalued in the public market right now. They’re the second best team in the country according to current Natty future odds. I have them to win it at +2600 for 2k. 66 % of tickets on michigan st, never a good sign. Nobody has an answer for Edey. He is a problem you can’t solve. Purdue rolls. But good luck, I’ve been wrong before
I used to be a sports insights subscriber. I was a member with them for about ten years. Two years ago I realized with how big sports betting is getting, and all the info out there, ticket %’s were the last thing I wanted to use for my handicapping. But if we do want to take that into consideration, draft kings and all the other square books have msu at 33%, so I could say that isn’t a good sign for Purdue? So who do we believe? This is another reason why I don’t use that tool anymore. as far as line moves go, nothing within two points from the open is a concern to me. I also can’t agree on them being undervalued. Against Ohio st they were undervalued. They were dogs to Ohio st and now are finally laying points o. The road to a competitive team. As for the big man, Purdue has a big guy every year. Before edey was haarms and before haarms was haas and so forth. Same person, different name, same game. Izzo has covered this number against all of them at home. Ohio st was on to something and eliminated edey in the first half but they double teamed way too much which left outside shots open for Purdue. Purdue doesn’t have an elite perimeter scorer like Ivey last year, and unlikE Ohio st, msu can shoot the three. So if they wanna have a shoot out, I think msu is totally fine with that. good luck on your bet and your future.
appreciate you guys stopping by and good luck to you all. I got my eye on two more. Let’s see how the early gsmes go
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
Purdue is really undervalued in the public market right now. They’re the second best team in the country according to current Natty future odds. I have them to win it at +2600 for 2k. 66 % of tickets on michigan st, never a good sign. Nobody has an answer for Edey. He is a problem you can’t solve. Purdue rolls. But good luck, I’ve been wrong before
I used to be a sports insights subscriber. I was a member with them for about ten years. Two years ago I realized with how big sports betting is getting, and all the info out there, ticket %’s were the last thing I wanted to use for my handicapping. But if we do want to take that into consideration, draft kings and all the other square books have msu at 33%, so I could say that isn’t a good sign for Purdue? So who do we believe? This is another reason why I don’t use that tool anymore. as far as line moves go, nothing within two points from the open is a concern to me. I also can’t agree on them being undervalued. Against Ohio st they were undervalued. They were dogs to Ohio st and now are finally laying points o. The road to a competitive team. As for the big man, Purdue has a big guy every year. Before edey was haarms and before haarms was haas and so forth. Same person, different name, same game. Izzo has covered this number against all of them at home. Ohio st was on to something and eliminated edey in the first half but they double teamed way too much which left outside shots open for Purdue. Purdue doesn’t have an elite perimeter scorer like Ivey last year, and unlikE Ohio st, msu can shoot the three. So if they wanna have a shoot out, I think msu is totally fine with that. good luck on your bet and your future.
appreciate you guys stopping by and good luck to you all. I got my eye on two more. Let’s see how the early gsmes go
Quote Originally Posted by sharper28: Purdue is really undervalued in the public market right now. They’re the second best team in the country according to current Natty future odds. I have them to win it at +2600 for 2k. 66 % of tickets on michigan st, never a good sign. Nobody has an answer for Edey. He is a problem you can’t solve. Purdue rolls. But good luck, I’ve been wrong before I used to be a sports insights subscriber. I was a member with them for about ten years. Two years ago I realized with how big sports betting is getting, and all the info out there, ticket %’s were the last thing I wanted to use for my handicapping. But if we do want to take that into consideration, draft kings and all the other square books have msu at 33%, so I could say that isn’t a good sign for Purdue? So who do we believe? This is another reason why I don’t use that tool anymore. as far as line moves go, nothing within two points from the open is a concern to me. I also can’t agree on them being undervalued. Against Ohio st they were undervalued. They were dogs to Ohio st and now are finally laying points o. The road to a competitive team. As for the big man, Purdue has a big guy every year. Before edey was haarms and before haarms was haas and so forth. Same person, different name, same game. Izzo has covered this number against all of them at home. Ohio st was on to something and eliminated edey in the first half but they double teamed way too much which left outside shots open for Purdue. Purdue doesn’t have an elite perimeter scorer like Ivey last year, and unlikE Ohio st, msu can shoot the three. So if they wanna have a shoot out, I think msu is totally fine with that. good luck on your bet and your future. appreciate you guys stopping by and good luck to you all. I got my eye on two more. Let’s see how the early gsmes go
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
Quote Originally Posted by sharper28: Purdue is really undervalued in the public market right now. They’re the second best team in the country according to current Natty future odds. I have them to win it at +2600 for 2k. 66 % of tickets on michigan st, never a good sign. Nobody has an answer for Edey. He is a problem you can’t solve. Purdue rolls. But good luck, I’ve been wrong before I used to be a sports insights subscriber. I was a member with them for about ten years. Two years ago I realized with how big sports betting is getting, and all the info out there, ticket %’s were the last thing I wanted to use for my handicapping. But if we do want to take that into consideration, draft kings and all the other square books have msu at 33%, so I could say that isn’t a good sign for Purdue? So who do we believe? This is another reason why I don’t use that tool anymore. as far as line moves go, nothing within two points from the open is a concern to me. I also can’t agree on them being undervalued. Against Ohio st they were undervalued. They were dogs to Ohio st and now are finally laying points o. The road to a competitive team. As for the big man, Purdue has a big guy every year. Before edey was haarms and before haarms was haas and so forth. Same person, different name, same game. Izzo has covered this number against all of them at home. Ohio st was on to something and eliminated edey in the first half but they double teamed way too much which left outside shots open for Purdue. Purdue doesn’t have an elite perimeter scorer like Ivey last year, and unlikE Ohio st, msu can shoot the three. So if they wanna have a shoot out, I think msu is totally fine with that. good luck on your bet and your future. appreciate you guys stopping by and good luck to you all. I got my eye on two more. Let’s see how the early gsmes go
didn't know this until now, but fwiw - chris caputo and kim english were competing for the vacant job last year to george mason. caputo obviously didn't win the position. probably gonna see a little fire in gw tonight
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
didn't know this until now, but fwiw - chris caputo and kim english were competing for the vacant job last year to george mason. caputo obviously didn't win the position. probably gonna see a little fire in gw tonight
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.