Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I've been pretty good at pickin college games all season, then givin my $ back on nfl and basketball. A couple of college games I've been wrong on have been on KSU over Baylor earlier and I can't get out of my mind how Baylor ran all over that KSU run D. The 2nd and most recent loss was Northern Illinois plus 2 TDs and a hook against FSU, not saying KSU is NIU, but they depend too much on 1 player (Klein) and don't have much else offensively besides him. I've been doing really well in during the bowls and at the beginning of them all I was really waiting to unload on 2 games, one was Georgia and the other was Oregon. Don't look too much into this game, like Kelly thinking about an NFL gig, go with Oregon in this one. 52-24
|
Capper007 | 198 |
|
|
Are we all ready to see another Patriots and NY Giants Super Bowl?
|
Crashdavis565 | 240 |
|
|
Chaminade will own UNC, be very careful to those of you wanting to play the Tarheels. Chaminade 125-74
|
mike214 | 36 |
|
|
Game will be 10-10 at the end of regulation and don't be surprised if this ends in another tie for SF. 34 or 35 or whatever that O/U is too high. There is gonna have to be 3 return TDs for the over to hit, possible yes but not likely. under is the play. Under almost always hits on MNF as well. I think it is 8-3 this year and last year it hit just about every week. UNDER UNDER UNDER
|
RuberBunsNStikR | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Donnie_Baseball: Urb is your angle? Get real I live in Wisconsin and for years have been saying that Wisconsin will never compete for a National Championship because of Bielma. He WILL indeed get outcoached by Meyer. OSU by a TD at least
|
Donnie_Baseball | 42 |
|
|
Both Seattle and SF have good defenses but a couple of O/U stats I found. Seattle is 14-0 over when a dog of 3.5 to 9 during the last 3 seasons, also 13-2 over when playing a team with a winning record during last 3 years. SF is 14-4 over when playing at home and total is between 35 and 38.5 since 2002. O/U is at 37.5 and Vegas is gonna bring it in when this over hits. SF put up 27 or more points in 4 of its previous 5 games prior to the Giants game and I think they are gonna play pissed and put up at least 27 again tonight. I think the score hits at least 28-10, probably by end of the 3rd quarter.
|
DanedaTrain | 15 |
|
|
Some statistical numbers I've looked at over the course of the years say Denver and Under. The stats I use are usually pretty good, except yesterday they said to play NE and Baltimore ( though should have won both). Monday night games usually play UNDER too so maybe I'll just play that and stay away from ATS
|
chungnuoc | 167 |
|
|
All I know is that the wind is forecasted to be gusting out towards right field. Righty pitching for the Os so I see the Yankees left handed hitters getting the ball in the air and the ball carries out. I'm on the over
|
HolySmoker | 18 |
|
|
I think it will be tough for the Reds to beat Cain twice in the series. However, I am staying away from the money line pick and see this as a pitchers duel. Score tops out at 4-2.
For later, I really like the Cards to close it out. They have some hot bats and Lohse pitching. That's gonna be my POD
|
illnasty10 | 27 |
|
|
Last year there were 8 games where the road team was fav by 10 or more points. In those games, the road fav went 0-8 ATS
|
RazorSharps | 363 |
|
|
Really? Can't you just pick a side with the actual line? I read all these posts and guys are saying they are 15-1 ATS but they tease spreads like a bunch of pussies. Anyone can hit the Pats and Texans plus 75 points. Wow, unreal man
|
alexandermo89 | 24 |
|
|
replied to
Residents of Huntington, West Virginia, please give me weather forcast for Saturday afternoon
in College Football
Two websites I use for sports weather are: intellicast.com and wunderground.com
There actually is a tab for Travel and activities that shows football and baseball stadiums for wind direction at the wunderground.com website
|
eddothebook | 8 |
|
|
I run a survivor pool and have noticed a pattern with Giants games. 2 years ago my pool ended when the Giants lost at home to the Cowboys, I think they were 16 point favs, last year the Seahawks game knocked just about everyone out of my pool, but wait, the pool ended when the Giants won at New England as a 10 point dog. My point being, the Giants lose games they should win and win games they should lose with consistency. Through in the fact that the NY Giants play at San Fran next week and I think both of those teams look ahead to that matchup. I would take a team like New England at home, especially seeing they lost their only home game they played this year, they won't be 0-2 at home.
|
jbkizzle | 11 |
|
|
replied to
16-4 record YTD ***Week 5 *** KMalinsky555 +53.61 units YTD. EXPLANATIONS AND TRENDS
in NFL Betting
I really like the Falcons/Skins OVER. Falcons own one of the bottom 5 run defenses in yardage so far too, so expect RGIII to expose that and keep the Redskins in this game. Don't know about the 9ers covering that number. They are coming back from 2 road games, last one being 5 hour plane trip back, and most importantly, they have the NY Giants the following week. Are they looking past a Bills team that is capable of scoring some points? I know I'm staying away from this one. The Saints OVER looks safe as well, especially seeing that it is certain the Saints get 1 passing TD and their defense will give up some yards to SD.
|
kmalinsky555 | 175 |
|
|
I live in Milwaukee and this morning I'm listening to one of the local sports talk radio shows and they were actually giving credit to how good the coaching staff did this year. That makes me sick. The Brewers went just 9-8 against the Astros, a team that has like 52 wins with 3 games left. Melvin decided it was a good idea at the beginning of the year to offer K-Rod arbitration in hopes of receiving a draft pick in return. Right there the season was over. He wasn't able to resign Hawkins or Saito because of that and our bullpen sucked ass all year. A draft pick in return??? Does he know that draft picks end up in the minors for like 4-5 years, or in the Brewers case 10-12 years. We have all these rookie pitchers this year that are like 29-30 years old and we drafted them back in 1999-2002. We should have made the playoffs easily but we had so many blown saves and a coaching staff that didn't understand that maybe they shouldn't keep sending these guys out in the 8-9 inning game after game. Or maybe we take care of the Astros more than 9 out of 17 games and we are in the playoffs. Can't wait to see how Melvin fixes this team. Oh wait, he wont
|
normanscay | 21 |
|
|
As a Packer fan, I'm disappointed in the outcome but I agree with the final call. Tate's 2 feet hit the ground before Jennings and both players had possession at the same time. Did Tate push off? Yeah, but Jennings came over the top too, could go either way. It really shouldn't have come down to the final play, the Packers coaching staff failed to have a game plan for the pass rush that Seattle came with in the first half. They made adjustments in 2nd half, but Seattle caused the same problems in the Cowboys game the week before and the Packers coaching staff should of been able to make those adjustments before the game started. If the Packers score 10 in first half, then final play doesn't matter.
|
vanzack | 479 |
|
|
Fuck no. The Pats haven't been under .500 since week 2 of the 2001 season. They bounce back huge today, they may not win but this game will be down to the wire and probably a high scoring game. Start Brady, he will put up numbers
|
BR3N7 | 14 |
|
|
Um, Arizona @ New England just last week????
These are professional football players playing, anything can happen
|
Riceboi | 43 |
|
|
I think it was 3 years ago and the Cubs were playing Houston and the O/U was like 15, I live in Milwaukee and the wind was blowing like crazy from the South so I played the over. It hit by like the 6th inning
|
Teaser78 | 186 |
|
|
Brewers hit better with Maldonado in lineup. He's not gonna start. Cardinals ML
|
si1ly | 68 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.