Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
O's!!
What am I missing here? Oakland is banged up, the O's have a great hitting lineup. Since Reimold was added to the lineup, they finally can hit Lefties (no offense Luke). Guthrie has struggled, but I think this one is a laugher.....3 Units on the boys from Baltimore
|
Covers | 8 |
|
|
Big 12 has been solid in tourney play though....13-4 ATS in the Big Dance, obviously Baylor has held there own. Compared to Big 10 at 7-7 (MSU is 4-0....that leaves a 3-7 mark for Big 10 competition in tourney action)....I will take my chances with Baylor tonight. Think they are more battle tested.....maritimemac and jahc420 are more in line with there assessments, I agree
|
Covers | 27 |
|
|
Who scores first.....the fast Rays lineup or the quick strike of sizemore? Can't read this one. Rays suck in cleveland, but cleveland sucks. Rays don't hit lefties well. Hrmmm....hit min, phi, mets, and cubs score 1st bets today, waiting on Oak to get on the board first. Help on this one guys
|
Mr_Covers | 20 |
|
|
GB -7 and Under 41
Pats -13.5 and Under 46.5
|
WillBetAnything | 31 |
|
|
gs pickem
|
WillBetAnything | 122 |
|
|
parlay
nj ml
pit ml
|
WillBetAnything | 34 |
|
|
Tor +9.5
|
WillBetAnything | 119 |
|
|
Can't believe I didn't get this in before game time......
Seattle +7.5
Jax +13
NYG +8
Indy -9.5
WillbetAnything....Don't blame you if you don't count this since I walked in and Seattle is up 7-0 with the ball.....
Whatever you decide is fine....I can send you my Covers NFL Picks contest selections that shows you I had Seattle (actually +9 at the time).
|
WillBetAnything | 70 |
|
|
Even though I went with WASU +2....potential look ahead game (if thats possible with this solid conference) with UCLA looming Saturday?
Or do they focus on making sure they at least get this game in this tough stretch they running into?
I went with the fact that they can pressure this young USC team and make it a long night for them. The Coug's may not be able to impose that will on a more veteran (college b-ball...how dumb am I for using the word veteran here) team in UCLA
|
I Play 4 Keeps | 27 |
|
|
WVU -1.5, they make this interesting in the 2nd half
|
wallet | 33 |
|
|
Over 70 is golden boys.....1st half was a low scoring fluke. These guys will blow away the 56 they scored in the 1st half
|
wallet | 33 |
|
|
Parlay
Dal ML
SJ ML
|
WillBetAnything | 45 |
|
|
Det/SA Under 180.5
|
WillBetAnything | 91 |
|
|
A great trend thats been interesting to watch is in games like tonight, there is such a desparity in FT shooting b/w these two teams.....in 5 of my last 6 plays, I went with an underdog that shot FT's better (by 5% or more). Tonight, Cal - the underdog - shots almost 10% better from the line.
Also, Cal has a history of playing well here....I like the Bears tonight
|
Mr_Covers | 3 |
|
|
Parlay
Pit ML
Pit/Fla Over 5.5
LA/Nash Over 5.5
|
WillBetAnything | 36 |
|
|
Lakers -5
|
WillBetAnything | 112 |
|
|
Teabag and Bigdaddy,....don't want to get in the middle of your squable...can't we all get along
Teabag, thanks for the compliments on my posts regarding the Over. Although LSU really stuck it to OSU.....I felt like the Over was the easiest play on the board.
Only cashed in for a G....went 8-2-1 in 11 bowl games (I try to restrain and be selective), so I didn't want to blow my hard work on one game.
The game was frustrating to watch as a Bucks fan....the Robiski dropped TD when it was tied at 10-10 was a big momentum changer. Wash all that, come out at half down 14, stop the Tigers and screw yourselves with that stupid roughing the punter, LSU scores right away....game over. Those are two big WHAT IF's....but I think OSU hurt themselves more than LSU dominated. Don't get me wrong, LSU is the better team, I just think it would have been a better game if OSU did step on its own - - - -
|
Mr_Covers | 310 |
|
|
phx over 227.5
|
WillBetAnything | 81 |
|
|
2 team parlay
NYI ML
ANA ML
|
WillBetAnything | 27 |
|
|
WillBetAnyThing.....quick question.....your rules originally said that we must post the lines that we got the games at OR if we didn't put the line down, you would go with the closing line.
Thus, I know there are a couple of us (myself included) that got the Steelers/Jags game at +/-2 (Jax -2 in my case). Wouldn't this constitute a push rather than a lose.........not complaining, just asking for clarification. A couple of our records should read 3-0-1 instead of 3-1. The tie rather than a loss may come into play in the end.
|
WillBetAnything | 70 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.