Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wow what a "spanking" by the Raiders.. I should have tailed you. And what a comeback by the Raiders. Good call there. I'll never question you ever again. |
LeagueCapper | 67 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:
Oakland Raiders @ Seattle SeahawksNot happy laying -120 on a 5 unit play but it's better than getting +2.5 later in the week. Shouldn't matter, Raiders should spank Seattle here. Locking this in now. Raiders +3 -120 (5x) +130 (1x)
Raiders should spank Seattle??? On what basis??????? Raiders are looking like the worst team in the league at the moment, besidse the Giants. And plus this game is in LONDON. There isn't a single justification that Raiders will "spank" the Seahawks. Cover the spread? Yeah, maybe. God your bookie must be rich because of you. |
LeagueCapper | 67 |
|
|
replied to
The BEST Season Win Total Bet on the NFL Board: The SEATTLE SEAHAWKS. Capped. Right here...
in NFL Betting
Scala! I've been tailing you for a long time and you've made numerous incredible picks and I respect you immensely for that!!! however with this pick, I must warn you that this isn't as easy as you're making it seem.. You're putting a lot of emphasis on unimportant stats such as preseason and as strength of schedule. You're forgetting that our KICKER was directly responsible for losing 3 games last year. Had our he made even 2 out of those 3 kicks and win us those games, we would have been 11-5 or 12-4 instead.. The hiring of their OC is extremely questionable. But you can't label these as disastrous descisions yet before even seeing the results.. Don't forget how many people questioned the Seahawks when we drafted Russell Wilson!!!!!! OH YA A MIDGET?!?!?! AS A QUARTERBACK?!? And look at him now. Top 3 QB. This is just my opinion, but I don't think that under 7.5 is a homerun. I would put money elsewhere. I mean just look at who they are playing this year, they can very EASILY win 8 games... Too easily actually.
|
scalabrine | 119 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by TheOtherTimTBo] trends don't mean. anything we all know that.. but good luck [/Quote
|
aerojackel | 4 |
|
|
Can't look at any of those stats because this is a back up quarterback.. McCown shows up and will put up points, especially with Hester giving him great field position
|
aerojackel | 4 |
|
|
Bears are gonna put up a lot of points with field goals - Hester will give them amazing field position... This game will be closer than you think.
|
ccbulldog | 3 |
|
|
I like it.. I think Green Bay does get off to a good start, I can see 7-3 after 1st Quarter or even 14-10 GB
|
Gr8nader | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheBuddah: Let's look at some numbers and discuss: Chi 14 11 25 27 18 24 11 GB 3 5 4 21 4 17 GB opens up as an 11 pt fav. Currently around 10. As you can see GB is better in all categories - O. rush, Pass, def. rush, pass and sagarin rank and sched. strength. This is what I call an 0/6 situation. Historically when you have a line around 10/11/12 points for the home team and the home team is better in every category - it means vegas has over valued the home team therefore you bet the away team. Also, what's interesting - these teams don't typically score many points - thus an under play is the way to go as well. Good luck all. These teams don't typically score many points??? Don't know what football you're watching, but these two teams have been putting up ridiculous points, even when they lose.... And your stats are irrelevant, because it is a different QB now and not Cutler.. Different QB, different strategy.. This game is a no play.
|
TheBuddah | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Hawkeye21: The Raiders are actually a bit surprising this year. Normally they are terrible but they show a spark now with Pryor and not to mention McFadden when healthy. I agree, but they still are one of the most terrible teams in the league. Zero consistency, zero offense, zero defence, zero special teams, the only advantage they have is kicker position. Philly rolls in this one I believe, Foles rips through this pathetic defence
|
paperchase14 | 9 |
|
|
I agree that Chiefs are going to stomp the Bills... But isn't this line fishy? Shouldn't Chiefs be minimum -7 in this game? I don't see how they're favorite only by 4.. Vegas wins imo
|
TheGrindHouse | 82 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by degengambler34: I know it's hard to play in seattle, I get that they're a better home team, doesn't change the fact that st. Louis has absolutely exposed how to defense this team. 9 in the box with very average or below average wideouts that should have no chance beating revis or goldsen in coverage. I know tampas offense is inept at best, but their defense has been solid. You clearly did not watch the Seattle-St Louis game... St louis exposed the seattle defence??? Accomplishing three field goals is exposing a defence to you?? They made stops when it mattered, they intercepted when it was needed to. Their defence won them the game, whether you like it or not. Seahawks win by 30+ in this game bud. No chance for Tampa.
|
degengambler34 | 15 |
|
|
Its so easy to say that after the game is done Seattle is better in EVERY SINGLE PART OF THE GAME!!!!!!! Do not tell me you should have bet Rams..
|
Mkuhi | 9 |
|
|
Dallas can't be trusted.. I would take Philly if it was up to me. Raiders are terrible.
|
paperchase14 | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: I thought you were actually going to provide statistics. I must be crazy. Actual statistics on covers? No way! This is where we say things like "Statistically speaking, you're odds are better MAKING the interception rather than batting the ball down. " with no backup statistics whatsoever! Just say "statistically" before any statement, and that makes it true! The covers way!!
Well said!!
|
dgnowsf | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dgnowsf: For those idiots who think statistically speaking, your chances that you bat the ball down in that situation and you have betters odds, you are a complete moron. Titans batted ball into Titus Young's hands for game tying touchdown just this past week. That is AT LEAST ONE instance. When is there ever an interception but the offense gets credit for a touchdown? NEVER, until tonight. Quit saying he should of batted the ball down. He made the play. Here's what some of your morons might get confused. There is a difference between making and attempting the interception. Statistically speaking, you're odds are better MAKING the interception rather than batting the ball down. Quit blaming Jennings. He didn't attempt for an interception, it was an interception. There is absolutely ZERO chance that an opposing team can catch a TD if you intercept the ball versus the slimmest less than 1% chance that someone catches it off a bat down, unless you got replacement refs. Where's your statistics that "you're odds are better MAKING the interception rather than batting the ball down" ?
|
dgnowsf | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by gblow23: I dont even care about the money won or lost on this game. But the integrity of the sport and league has been lost. Well said! This is a big blow to football.. It won't be the same.
|
gblow23 | 35 |
|
|
|
The8ofCups | 4 |
|
|
Lol you just realized tonight??
|
malkin | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG: How much did you win? |
Johnny_T | 24 |
|
|
|
nuggetmonster | 8 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.