Oh yeah and the lack of a response by the military and NORAD is just a bunch of denial and excuses. If it was a surprise attack then I could except their excuses but since I know they were on alert since 1998, I find your excuses laughable. The North Koreans, Iranians, Russians, and Chinese should just use planes. I have no idea why they spend billion on weapons... when planes is the US weakness
planes were never a weakness
On the morning of 9/11, the existing protocol was unsuited in every respect for what was about to happen.
the protocols in place on 9/11 for the FAA and NORAD to respond to a hijacking presumed that
the hijacked aircraft would be readily identifiable and would not attempt to disappear;
there would be time to address the problem through the appropriate FAA and NORAD chains of command; and
hijacking would take the traditional form: that is, it would
not be a suicide hijacking designed to convert the aircraft into a
guided missile
The hijacking did not follow the protocols that existed prior to 9/11.
Oh yeah and the lack of a response by the military and NORAD is just a bunch of denial and excuses. If it was a surprise attack then I could except their excuses but since I know they were on alert since 1998, I find your excuses laughable. The North Koreans, Iranians, Russians, and Chinese should just use planes. I have no idea why they spend billion on weapons... when planes is the US weakness
planes were never a weakness
On the morning of 9/11, the existing protocol was unsuited in every respect for what was about to happen.
the protocols in place on 9/11 for the FAA and NORAD to respond to a hijacking presumed that
the hijacked aircraft would be readily identifiable and would not attempt to disappear;
there would be time to address the problem through the appropriate FAA and NORAD chains of command; and
hijacking would take the traditional form: that is, it would
not be a suicide hijacking designed to convert the aircraft into a
guided missile
The hijacking did not follow the protocols that existed prior to 9/11.
Oh yeah and the lack of a response by the military and NORAD is just a bunch of denial and excuses. If it was a surprise attack then I could except their excuses but since I know they were on alert since 1998, I find your excuses laughable. The North Koreans, Iranians, Russians, and Chinese should just use planes. I have no idea why they spend billion on weapons... when planes is the US weakness
The protocols did not contemplate an intercept. They assumed the fighter
escort would be discreet, "vectored to a position five miles directly
behind the hijacked aircraft," where it could perform its mission to
monitor the aircraft's flight path.
Oh yeah and the lack of a response by the military and NORAD is just a bunch of denial and excuses. If it was a surprise attack then I could except their excuses but since I know they were on alert since 1998, I find your excuses laughable. The North Koreans, Iranians, Russians, and Chinese should just use planes. I have no idea why they spend billion on weapons... when planes is the US weakness
The protocols did not contemplate an intercept. They assumed the fighter
escort would be discreet, "vectored to a position five miles directly
behind the hijacked aircraft," where it could perform its mission to
monitor the aircraft's flight path.
NEADS air defenders had nine minutes' notice on the first hijacked
plane, no advance notice on the second, no advance notice on the third,
and no advance notice on the fourth.
NEADS air defenders had nine minutes' notice on the first hijacked
plane, no advance notice on the second, no advance notice on the third,
and no advance notice on the fourth.
Oh yeah and the lack of a response by the military and NORAD is just a bunch of denial and excuses. If it was a surprise attack then I could except their excuses but since I know they were on alert since 1998, I find your excuses laughable. The North Koreans, Iranians, Russians, and Chinese should just use planes. I have no idea why they spend billion on weapons... when planes is the US weakness
No lack of response No denial No excuses They were never on alert for this type of event Those Countries could never conduct a overwhelming attack on the US by planes,that's why they have ICBM. That is not Astro physics.
No mater how hard you try you will not be able to distort historical fact. Propaganda and deception will never distort the historical facts.
Oh yeah and the lack of a response by the military and NORAD is just a bunch of denial and excuses. If it was a surprise attack then I could except their excuses but since I know they were on alert since 1998, I find your excuses laughable. The North Koreans, Iranians, Russians, and Chinese should just use planes. I have no idea why they spend billion on weapons... when planes is the US weakness
No lack of response No denial No excuses They were never on alert for this type of event Those Countries could never conduct a overwhelming attack on the US by planes,that's why they have ICBM. That is not Astro physics.
No mater how hard you try you will not be able to distort historical fact. Propaganda and deception will never distort the historical facts.
So sad you are so misinformed and keep misinforming people.
Im sorry to say this but you are very gullible and ignorant. That is the truth.
Notice 911 believers continue to say it was a surprise and that they were never on alert for this type of event, when in fact they were completely aware of an attack like this since 1998. The 700 billion dollar supremely advanced, most powerful and sophisticated military couldn't stop terrorists with 3 years notice and couldn't stop airliners with the most advanced military but are prepared for world war 3...
The United States intelligence community was told in 1998 (3 years before 911) that Arab terrorists were planning to fly bomb-laden planes into the World Trade Center
In the TWO years before the September 11th attacks, NORAD conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: Hijacked Airliners used as weapons to crash into targets
USA today reports the TWO YEARS before the September 11th attacks, an analysis prepared for US intelligence warned that Osama Bin Laden's terrorists could hijack an airliner and fly it into government buildings
Washington (CNN) US intelligence officials had several warings that terrorists might attack the United States on it's home soil, even using airplanes as weapons, well before the September 11th attacks, two congressional committees said in a report
No mater how hard you try you will not be able to distort historical
fact. Propaganda and deception will never distort the historical facts.
I don't even think 911 believers know how to read sometimes and it seems they're inept at putting things together and critical thinking.
Gullible, ignorant and naive to common sense and facts
So sad you are so misinformed and keep misinforming people.
Im sorry to say this but you are very gullible and ignorant. That is the truth.
Notice 911 believers continue to say it was a surprise and that they were never on alert for this type of event, when in fact they were completely aware of an attack like this since 1998. The 700 billion dollar supremely advanced, most powerful and sophisticated military couldn't stop terrorists with 3 years notice and couldn't stop airliners with the most advanced military but are prepared for world war 3...
The United States intelligence community was told in 1998 (3 years before 911) that Arab terrorists were planning to fly bomb-laden planes into the World Trade Center
In the TWO years before the September 11th attacks, NORAD conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: Hijacked Airliners used as weapons to crash into targets
USA today reports the TWO YEARS before the September 11th attacks, an analysis prepared for US intelligence warned that Osama Bin Laden's terrorists could hijack an airliner and fly it into government buildings
Washington (CNN) US intelligence officials had several warings that terrorists might attack the United States on it's home soil, even using airplanes as weapons, well before the September 11th attacks, two congressional committees said in a report
No mater how hard you try you will not be able to distort historical
fact. Propaganda and deception will never distort the historical facts.
I don't even think 911 believers know how to read sometimes and it seems they're inept at putting things together and critical thinking.
Gullible, ignorant and naive to common sense and facts
When using YouTube videos to "prove" your right...
How specifically... do you determine which YouTubes are fact and which ones are totally bullshit. And which ones are half truth meant to mislead and confuse the gullible?
When using YouTube videos to "prove" your right...
How specifically... do you determine which YouTubes are fact and which ones are totally bullshit. And which ones are half truth meant to mislead and confuse the gullible?
When using YouTube videos to "prove" your right...
How specifically... do you determine which YouTubes are fact and which ones are totally bullshit. And which ones are half truth meant to mislead and confuse the gullible?
Randisist glad you stopped in buddy. Hope everything is good and well.
I would say if it’s a video defends secrecy and suppression of evidence, defends Bush and Cheney's secret testimony, defends FEMA, defends the gaps and inconsistencies that reveal fundamental flaws in NIST's analyses, defends destroying the evidence, defends FAA and NORAD, defends no black boxes, defends the government not letting investigators have unrestricted access to Ground Zero, defends the government not letting investigators have blueprints of the buildings, defends the fact that 9/11 Commission Report failed to even mention the destruction of Building 7, defends the fact that the 9/11 Commission Report denied the existence of the Twin Towers' core structures, defends commanders lying to the 9/11 Commission about the military response, defends the 911 commission…I can assure it was designed to mislead and confuse the gullible. If the person who created the video dismisses Operations Vigilant Warrior, Gulf of Tonkin false flag, Operation Northwoods, Operation Vigilant Guardian, and Operation Northern Vigilance... I can assure you it was designed to mislead and confuse the gullible. If the person dismisses… dismisses Hani Hanjour inability to fly, dismisses the stock trades, dismisses the fact that the alleged hijackers partied at topless bars and drank alcohol, despite being portrayed as fundamentalist Muslims and demises the fact that the government sold Americans a total lie, Bush put the Bin Laden Family on the first flight out of the country after 9/11, Bush was warned Bin Laden determined to strike in US, 36 days before 911, Bush told officials to back off before 911, Bush was warned Bin Laden wanted to hijack planes, NORAD had drills of planes as weapons, US intelligence officials had several warnings, Federal agency planned plane crash into building drill a year before 911, A plane crash is simulated inside the cardboard courtyard of the pentagon. The exercise was designed to help emergency personnel before 911, FBI knew terrorists were using flight schools, The US was told in 1998 that Arab terrorists were planing to fly a bomb-laden plane into the World Trade Center, Two years before 911 an analysis prepared for US intelligence warned that Osama Bin Laden's terrorists could hijack an airliner and fly it into government buildings etc…. this is beyond ridiculous already…
I can assure you it was designed to mislead and confuse the gullible.
When using YouTube videos to "prove" your right...
How specifically... do you determine which YouTubes are fact and which ones are totally bullshit. And which ones are half truth meant to mislead and confuse the gullible?
Randisist glad you stopped in buddy. Hope everything is good and well.
I would say if it’s a video defends secrecy and suppression of evidence, defends Bush and Cheney's secret testimony, defends FEMA, defends the gaps and inconsistencies that reveal fundamental flaws in NIST's analyses, defends destroying the evidence, defends FAA and NORAD, defends no black boxes, defends the government not letting investigators have unrestricted access to Ground Zero, defends the government not letting investigators have blueprints of the buildings, defends the fact that 9/11 Commission Report failed to even mention the destruction of Building 7, defends the fact that the 9/11 Commission Report denied the existence of the Twin Towers' core structures, defends commanders lying to the 9/11 Commission about the military response, defends the 911 commission…I can assure it was designed to mislead and confuse the gullible. If the person who created the video dismisses Operations Vigilant Warrior, Gulf of Tonkin false flag, Operation Northwoods, Operation Vigilant Guardian, and Operation Northern Vigilance... I can assure you it was designed to mislead and confuse the gullible. If the person dismisses… dismisses Hani Hanjour inability to fly, dismisses the stock trades, dismisses the fact that the alleged hijackers partied at topless bars and drank alcohol, despite being portrayed as fundamentalist Muslims and demises the fact that the government sold Americans a total lie, Bush put the Bin Laden Family on the first flight out of the country after 9/11, Bush was warned Bin Laden determined to strike in US, 36 days before 911, Bush told officials to back off before 911, Bush was warned Bin Laden wanted to hijack planes, NORAD had drills of planes as weapons, US intelligence officials had several warnings, Federal agency planned plane crash into building drill a year before 911, A plane crash is simulated inside the cardboard courtyard of the pentagon. The exercise was designed to help emergency personnel before 911, FBI knew terrorists were using flight schools, The US was told in 1998 that Arab terrorists were planing to fly a bomb-laden plane into the World Trade Center, Two years before 911 an analysis prepared for US intelligence warned that Osama Bin Laden's terrorists could hijack an airliner and fly it into government buildings etc…. this is beyond ridiculous already…
I can assure you it was designed to mislead and confuse the gullible.
Yes, Hutch. I do. I see through this whole story. And I saw through it in the beginning when I questioned the fact that religious fanatics would be able to take over planes with boxers and execute this plan, then committ suicide.
To some people who are intelligent, Im sure this smelled fishy from the beginning.
To others, who watch tv and believe everything they are told, they are conditioned to accept it without questioning.
Yes, Hutch. I do. I see through this whole story. And I saw through it in the beginning when I questioned the fact that religious fanatics would be able to take over planes with boxers and execute this plan, then committ suicide.
To some people who are intelligent, Im sure this smelled fishy from the beginning.
To others, who watch tv and believe everything they are told, they are conditioned to accept it without questioning.
I will ask again what is the test to determine if a video uploaded to YouTube is fact or fiction?
I really wonder who someone is working for when they push YouTube videos as fact and run from the question as to how was it determined that the videos they champion are fact.
The last thing someone with a hidden agenda wants is for the "evidence" to be examined objectively OR for the validity to be questioned.
I will ask again what is the test to determine if a video uploaded to YouTube is fact or fiction?
I really wonder who someone is working for when they push YouTube videos as fact and run from the question as to how was it determined that the videos they champion are fact.
The last thing someone with a hidden agenda wants is for the "evidence" to be examined objectively OR for the validity to be questioned.
I will ask again what is the test to determine if a video uploaded to YouTube is fact or fiction?
I really wonder who someone is working for when they push YouTube videos as fact and run from the question as to how was it determined that the videos they champion are fact.
The last thing someone with a hidden agenda wants is for the "evidence" to be examined objectively OR for the validity to be questioned.
If it’s a 911 first responder, 911 family member, 911 grounds worker, professor, physicist, scientist, architect, or engineer speaking. I believe the person deserves to be listened to. It depends on the message, the messenger, and the type of video. It’s a judgment call I guess.
I will ask again what is the test to determine if a video uploaded to YouTube is fact or fiction?
I really wonder who someone is working for when they push YouTube videos as fact and run from the question as to how was it determined that the videos they champion are fact.
The last thing someone with a hidden agenda wants is for the "evidence" to be examined objectively OR for the validity to be questioned.
If it’s a 911 first responder, 911 family member, 911 grounds worker, professor, physicist, scientist, architect, or engineer speaking. I believe the person deserves to be listened to. It depends on the message, the messenger, and the type of video. It’s a judgment call I guess.
Randisist glad you stopped in buddy. Hope everything is good and well.
Money,
Life is good. Could always be better. Hope you and all yours are doing well.
My friend... I have faith at least you can understand I am not disputing any YouTube videos. I just know how easy it is to create facts. As to trusting the government... I trust the government as far as I can throw the White House.
My hidden agenda? Easy, to make people think and question the evidence. Human nature dictates that when people lie there is a desperation to be believed. When people tell the truth and are honest they do not have to have anybody believe them because they know that they are right.
Randisist glad you stopped in buddy. Hope everything is good and well.
Money,
Life is good. Could always be better. Hope you and all yours are doing well.
My friend... I have faith at least you can understand I am not disputing any YouTube videos. I just know how easy it is to create facts. As to trusting the government... I trust the government as far as I can throw the White House.
My hidden agenda? Easy, to make people think and question the evidence. Human nature dictates that when people lie there is a desperation to be believed. When people tell the truth and are honest they do not have to have anybody believe them because they know that they are right.
If it’s a 911 first responder, 911 family member, 911 grounds worker, professor, physicist, scientist, architect, or engineer speaking. I believe the person deserves to be listened to. It depends on the message, the messenger, and the type of video. It’s a judgment call I guess.
If it’s a 911 first responder, 911 family member, 911 grounds worker, professor, physicist, scientist, architect, or engineer speaking. I believe the person deserves to be listened to. It depends on the message, the messenger, and the type of video. It’s a judgment call I guess.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.