2 things:
If he runs for higher office, I wonder what percentage of the Latin vote he would get.
I wonder if Fox News will even report this story
2 things:
If he runs for higher office, I wonder what percentage of the Latin vote he would get.
I wonder if Fox News will even report this story
2 things:
If he runs for higher office, I wonder what percentage of the Latin vote he would get.
I wonder if Fox News will even report this story
Why is there such a thing as the "Latin" vote'
Or for that matter the black or white vote?
Isn't is supposed to be the citizens of the United States vote. (ethnicity irrelevent)
2 things:
If he runs for higher office, I wonder what percentage of the Latin vote he would get.
I wonder if Fox News will even report this story
Why is there such a thing as the "Latin" vote'
Or for that matter the black or white vote?
Isn't is supposed to be the citizens of the United States vote. (ethnicity irrelevent)
Why is there such a thing as the "Latin" vote'
Or for that matter the black or white vote?
Isn't is supposed to be the citizens of the United States vote. (ethnicity irrelevent)
Why is there such a thing as the "Latin" vote'
Or for that matter the black or white vote?
Isn't is supposed to be the citizens of the United States vote. (ethnicity irrelevent)
Are you kidding me? Do you know how many black voters vote for the GOP? And do you know why Obama finally won Virginia and North Carolina? Because of the changing demographics. Latino voters have infiltrated these states and Latinos are the fastest growing group. Go ahead and piss them off, and see where it gets you?
Well I think the GOP is seeing where it's getting them . . . a ticket to the sidelines again.
It's not a perfect world, never has been
Are you kidding me? Do you know how many black voters vote for the GOP? And do you know why Obama finally won Virginia and North Carolina? Because of the changing demographics. Latino voters have infiltrated these states and Latinos are the fastest growing group. Go ahead and piss them off, and see where it gets you?
Well I think the GOP is seeing where it's getting them . . . a ticket to the sidelines again.
It's not a perfect world, never has been
Yeah, unfortunately that's right Ktrain.
Yeah, unfortunately that's right Ktrain.
Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez.........
Who is Thomas E. Perez..?
Perez was also actively involved in the dismissal of charges in the DOJ case again the New Black Panther Party and has been accused of lying under oath about the case.
He was also a former board member of La Raza group CASA de Maryland...( known as illegals' ACORN).
Looks like ' the race' group have no problem calling Sherrif Joe a “racist”...
Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez.........
Who is Thomas E. Perez..?
Perez was also actively involved in the dismissal of charges in the DOJ case again the New Black Panther Party and has been accused of lying under oath about the case.
He was also a former board member of La Raza group CASA de Maryland...( known as illegals' ACORN).
Looks like ' the race' group have no problem calling Sherrif Joe a “racist”...
Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez.........
Who is Thomas E. Perez..?
Perez was also actively involved in the dismissal of charges in the DOJ case again the New Black Panther Party and has been accused of lying under oath about the case.
He was also a former board member of La Raza group CASA de Maryland...( known as illegals' ACORN).
Looks like ' the race' group have no problem calling Sherrif Joe a “racist”...
Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez.........
Who is Thomas E. Perez..?
Perez was also actively involved in the dismissal of charges in the DOJ case again the New Black Panther Party and has been accused of lying under oath about the case.
He was also a former board member of La Raza group CASA de Maryland...( known as illegals' ACORN).
Looks like ' the race' group have no problem calling Sherrif Joe a “racist”...
Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez.........
Who is Thomas E. Perez..?
Perez was also actively involved in the dismissal of charges in the DOJ case again the New Black Panther Party and has been accused of lying under oath about the case.
He was also a former board member of La Raza group CASA de Maryland...( known as illegals' ACORN).
Looks like ' the race' group have no problem calling Sherrif Joe a “racist”...
Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez.........
Who is Thomas E. Perez..?
Perez was also actively involved in the dismissal of charges in the DOJ case again the New Black Panther Party and has been accused of lying under oath about the case.
He was also a former board member of La Raza group CASA de Maryland...( known as illegals' ACORN).
Looks like ' the race' group have no problem calling Sherrif Joe a “racist”...
How come I'm not shocked, that you would dirty someone who questions the motives of someone who only claims ( in link #2 ) "it appears" ..and that the evidence “contain no meaningful descriptions of criminal activity ?
If someone is accused of something ,,it does not prove that it happened..Justice is best determined in a court of law ..Government sanctions does not prove guilt.
..and talk about dirty ..in typical Obama fashion notice Perez release the report to the MSM before Arpaio’s office could respond to the letter ..that's dirty in my book.
How come I'm not shocked, that you would dirty someone who questions the motives of someone who only claims ( in link #2 ) "it appears" ..and that the evidence “contain no meaningful descriptions of criminal activity ?
If someone is accused of something ,,it does not prove that it happened..Justice is best determined in a court of law ..Government sanctions does not prove guilt.
..and talk about dirty ..in typical Obama fashion notice Perez release the report to the MSM before Arpaio’s office could respond to the letter ..that's dirty in my book.
How come I'm not shocked, that you would dirty someone who questions the motives of someone who only claims ( in link #2 ) "it appears" ..and that the evidence “contain no meaningful descriptions of criminal activity ?
If someone is accused of something ,,it does not prove that it happened..Justice is best determined in a court of law ..Government sanctions does not prove guilt.
..and talk about dirty ..in typical Obama fashion notice Perez release the report to the MSM before Arpaio’s office could respond to the letter ..that's dirty in my book.
How come I'm not shocked, that you would dirty someone who questions the motives of someone who only claims ( in link #2 ) "it appears" ..and that the evidence “contain no meaningful descriptions of criminal activity ?
If someone is accused of something ,,it does not prove that it happened..Justice is best determined in a court of law ..Government sanctions does not prove guilt.
..and talk about dirty ..in typical Obama fashion notice Perez release the report to the MSM before Arpaio’s office could respond to the letter ..that's dirty in my book.
Typical Obama fashion = no indictments...instead they are trying to convict the Sheriff in the media....
...and what is Big Sis doing ?
"Homeland Security also will restrict the sheriff's office use of the Secure Communities program, which uses fingerprints collected in local jails to identify illegal immigrants."
Withholding a tool (fingerprints) used for law enforcement ...If they can prove he has done something illegal, bring him up on charges..
All they are doing is protecting illegal immigrants for the hispanic votes...La Raza is partying hardy tonight.
Typical Obama fashion = no indictments...instead they are trying to convict the Sheriff in the media....
...and what is Big Sis doing ?
"Homeland Security also will restrict the sheriff's office use of the Secure Communities program, which uses fingerprints collected in local jails to identify illegal immigrants."
Withholding a tool (fingerprints) used for law enforcement ...If they can prove he has done something illegal, bring him up on charges..
All they are doing is protecting illegal immigrants for the hispanic votes...La Raza is partying hardy tonight.
Typical Obama fashion = no indictments...instead they are trying to convict the Sheriff in the media....
e.i. Thomas Perez was just on AC360............
Typical Obama fashion = no indictments...instead they are trying to convict the Sheriff in the media....
e.i. Thomas Perez was just on AC360............
Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez.........
Who is Thomas E. Perez..?
Perez was also actively involved in the dismissal of charges in the DOJ case again the New Black Panther Party and has been accused of lying under oath about the case.
He was also a former board member of La Raza group CASA de Maryland...( known as illegals' ACORN).
Looks like ' the race' group have no problem calling Sherrif Joe a “racist”...
+2
Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez.........
Who is Thomas E. Perez..?
Perez was also actively involved in the dismissal of charges in the DOJ case again the New Black Panther Party and has been accused of lying under oath about the case.
He was also a former board member of La Raza group CASA de Maryland...( known as illegals' ACORN).
Looks like ' the race' group have no problem calling Sherrif Joe a “racist”...
+2
Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez.........
Who is Thomas E. Perez..?
Perez was also actively involved in the dismissal of charges in the DOJ case again the New Black Panther Party and has been accused of lying under oath about the case.
He was also a former board member of La Raza group CASA de Maryland...( known as illegals' ACORN).
Looks like ' the race' group have no problem calling Sherrif Joe a “racist”...
+3
Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez.........
Who is Thomas E. Perez..?
Perez was also actively involved in the dismissal of charges in the DOJ case again the New Black Panther Party and has been accused of lying under oath about the case.
He was also a former board member of La Raza group CASA de Maryland...( known as illegals' ACORN).
Looks like ' the race' group have no problem calling Sherrif Joe a “racist”...
+3
+4
failed federal regulations and regulators once again
imagine that
but lets get that sherriff, he is against the constitution
+4
failed federal regulations and regulators once again
imagine that
but lets get that sherriff, he is against the constitution
How come I'm not shocked, that you would dirty someone who questions the motives of someone who only claims ( in link #2 ) "it appears" ..and that the evidence “contain no meaningful descriptions of criminal activity ?
If someone is accused of something ,,it does not prove that it happened..Justice is best determined in a court of law ..Government sanctions does not prove guilt.
..and talk about dirty ..in typical Obama fashion notice Perez release the report to the MSM before Arpaio’s office could respond to the letter ..that's dirty in my book.
If I had a $1 for every post of yours containing some innuendo about a democrat, I could take everyone on this forum to Vegas for a week.
How come I'm not shocked, that you would dirty someone who questions the motives of someone who only claims ( in link #2 ) "it appears" ..and that the evidence “contain no meaningful descriptions of criminal activity ?
If someone is accused of something ,,it does not prove that it happened..Justice is best determined in a court of law ..Government sanctions does not prove guilt.
..and talk about dirty ..in typical Obama fashion notice Perez release the report to the MSM before Arpaio’s office could respond to the letter ..that's dirty in my book.
If I had a $1 for every post of yours containing some innuendo about a democrat, I could take everyone on this forum to Vegas for a week.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.