Quote Originally Posted by tpjw44:
I'm retiring from this thread. I get geared up every so often to try to explain things, but it's clearly a waste of time. Why do I care what this guy thinks about 09/11? You win! Yayyyyyyy!!!! Adios boys
The idea the Gulf of Tonkin was a false flag operation by the US government to go to war is an example of what the government will do. It killed it’s own soldiers based on a false flag operation. Operation northwoods is just another cluster fuck to you, I’m guessing. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency , or other operatives, to commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. One of the most fascinating aspects of Operation Northwoods involved the proposed hijacking of an American passenger plane. The JCS proposed that a real plane containing American passengers would be hijacked by friendly forces disguised as Cuban agents. The plane would drop down off the radar screen and be replaced by a pilotless aircraft, which would crash, purportedly killing all the passengers. Under the plan, the real passenger plane would be secretly flown back to the United States. The fact that the US government even considered this is a red flag. I guess everything on this post is just unbelievable coincidences and misunderstandings.
FEMA assembled a team of volunteers from the American Society of Civil Engineers
This is misleading for several reasons: It implies that the Building Performance Assessment Team conducted an on-site investigation of the collapses, when in fact they were only allowed a walk-through of Ground Zero, derided by an investigator as a "tourist trip." Their only hands-on study of the debris was in salvage yards, and included an examination of far less than 1% of the steel. Investigators were not provided with the blueprints of the buildings. The 9/11 Commission Report failed to even mention the destruction of Building 7. The 9/11 Commission Report denied the existence of the Twin Towers' core structures. When presented with evidence of explosives, NIST has done the opposite of investigating: It has denied, evaded, changed the subject, and produced straw-man arguments.
American Society of Civil Engineers disclosures of Steel Sulfidation… The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. ... A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires.
The authors don't speculate on whether the findings are evidence of explosives, but the New York Times called them "perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation."
Despite the ASCE's call for further investigation, NIST's Report ignores the findings.
Unfortunately NIST does not share its visual database with the public. Are there any videos in NIST's archive that show the alleged column bowing? They would immediately show whether the effect was due to refraction or to column distortion.
The Report boasts about the computer models it used to simulate the crashes and fires, but it does not make its models available for download, nor does it publish any of the data sets generated by the models.
The Report does not contain footnotes. It is filled with claims, the basis for which the reader can only guess. It leaves the public with no way to compare its conclusions with the evidence on which it was purportedly based.
I believe the NIST worked ass backwards. It started from the end and worked it’s way to fit a story line. It’s not that they deliberately did it that way…it’s because they don’t want to except the idea that the government was involved. It’s impossible to not have emotions attached to the investigation. If you passionately believe in the governments story…it won’t matter how much evidence there is if you are not willing to even except it. Most of the firefighters, police officers, a most of the family members have just blindly excepted the governments account. It’s a combination of painful emotion, naive ignorance and denial.
NIST encounters resistance, pretends to investigate
The surpression of video evidence of the pentagon
Simulator recreation demonstrates pentagon attack impossibility
I stand with Bob McIlvaine and his experts because Mr. McIlvaine has dedicated his life to finding the truth about why the government killed his son. The man has studied every single piece of evidence and is extremely well educated. Bob Mcllvaine video
Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Military commanders all repeatedly say it was a surprise attack. Bush put the Bin Laden Family on the first flight out of the country after 9/11, Bush was warned Bin Laden determined to strike in US, 36 days before 91, Bush told officials to back off before 911, Bush was warned Bin Laden wanted to hijack planes, NORAD had drills of planes as weapons, US intelligence officials had several warnings, Federal agency planned plane crash into building drill a year before 911, A plane crash is simulated inside the cardboard courtyard of the pentagon. The exercise was designed to help emergency personnel before 91, FBI knew terrorists were using flight schools, The US was told in 1998 that Arab terrorists were planing to fly a bomb-laden plane into the World Trade Center, Two years before 911 an analysis prepared for US intelligence warned that Osama Bin Laden's terrorists could hijack an airliner and fly it into government buildings etc…. this is beyond ridiculous already.
I guess everything on this post is just unbelievable coincidences and misunderstandings.
People are so gullible and naive..i feel like i'm wasting my time also Gizmo